• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Griffiths page 176

  • Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date
1,996
1
[SOLVED] Griffiths page 176

1. Homework Statement
Below example 4.4, Griffiths says "We cannot apply Gauss's law precisely at the surface of a dielectric, for rho_b blows up..."

Why does rho_b blow up?


2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
 

Answers and Replies

1,996
1
anyone?
 
clem
Science Advisor
1,308
15
That sentence is a bit convoluted, but G is probably referring to bound surface charge density, which corresponds to infinite volume charge density.
If a discussion in GIII confuses you, go back to GI, which has less of that confusing help.
 
511
1
Hello ehrenfest,it is an interesting question and I wonder if I myself understood this point while I read this section a year or two ago.

The problem is with the definition of [tex]\rho_b=\ - \ div \ P [/tex] and [tex]\sigma_b=\ P.n[/tex].UNDERSTAND that P is determined by [tex]\sigma_b[/tex] and [tex]\rho_b[/tex]

Note that when we say there is a quantity [tex]\rho_b[/tex] and another quantity [tex]\sigma_b[/tex],we generally do not care if there is any sharp boundary between the charge distributions.I mean we do not say upto 0.005 cm below the surface we would call [tex]\sigma_b[/tex] and below that we would call as [tex]\rho_b[/tex]

As Griffiths gives hint the charge density is expected to be gradually fade out toward the boundary.This makes [tex]\rho_b[/tex] a continuous function and hence P is also continuous.POLARIZATION GRADUALLY TAPERS OFF TO ZERO.This exculdes the existence of [tex]\sigma_b[/tex]

But if there were a sharp boundary like I mentioned, polarization P would be discontinuos across that boundary near (on) the surface and by taking the divergence you will get [tex]\rho_b=\infty[/tex].

I hope the problem is now clear to you.
 
1,996
1
This exculdes the existence of [tex]\sigma_b[/tex]
I see. So you are saying that a uniformly polarized object of finite size is unphysical.
 
Last edited:
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,864
160
Not quite. What he's referring to is that any surface charge distribution can be written as a volume charge distribution by means of delta functions. For example, the surface charge density of a uniformly charged sphere can be written

[tex]\rho(r, \theta, \phi) = \frac{Q}{4\pi a^2}\delta(r - a)[/tex]

Naturally, this function blows up on the surface itself, just as the charge density (and divergence of E) blows up at a point charge.
 
511
1
Not quite. What he's referring to is that any surface charge distribution can be written as a volume charge distribution by means of delta functions.
I meant not exactly this,but like this.Refer to Griffiths problem 1.45 (b).The derivative of a step function is a delta function.Likewise If there is a distinguishable sharp boundary like between core and cover (jacket) of a body,rho_b must blow up.

In reality you might have a uniform polarized object.But do not be too obsessed with the distinction of rho_b and sigma_b---they are the different faces of the SAME distribution and is not different like core and cover (jacket).
 

Related Threads for: Griffiths page 176

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
494
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Top