• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Griffiths Problem 4.8

  • Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date
1,996
1
[SOLVED] Griffiths Problem 4.8

1. Homework Statement
This question refers to Griffiths E and M book.

Why is the answer not 2 times that?
Why don't you need to add the energy of dipole 1 to the energy of dipole 2 like

[tex] \bf -p_1 \cdot E_2 - p_2 \cdot E_1 [/tex]

?


2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
 

Answers and Replies

nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,540
181
1. Homework Statement
This question refers to Griffiths E and M book.

Why is the answer not 2 times that?
Why don't you need to add the energy of dipole 1 to the energy of dipole 2 like

[tex] \bf -p_1 \cdot E_2 - p_2 \cdot E_1 [/tex]

?


2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
For the same reason that the potential energy of a pair of two point charges is k q_1 q_2/r.

Imagine assembling the system, starting with the two dipoles at infinite distances. Bringing the first dipole from infinity requires no energy. Bringing the second dipole from infinity (while holding the first one at rest) requires an energy equal to - p2 dot E_1. That's the total energy stored in the system since it's the total energy that was required to assemble the system
 
1,996
1
For the same reason that the potential energy of a pair of two point charges is k q_1 q_2/r.

Imagine assembling the system, starting with the two dipoles at infinite distances. Bringing the first dipole from infinity requires no energy. Bringing the second dipole from infinity (while holding the first one at rest) requires an energy equal to - p2 dot E_1. That's the total energy stored in the system since it's the total energy that was required to assemble the system
But it also requires energy to hold the first dipole at rest, doesn't it? Well I guess there is no work done doing that. But it seems like you don't get that for free!
 
Last edited:
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,540
181
But it also requires energy to hold the first dipole at rest, doesn't it? Well I guess there is no work done doing that. But is seems like you don't get that for free!
as you say, there is no work involved doing that. I know what you mean but there is a very clear definition of work in physics and we have to stick to it.
 

Related Threads for: Griffiths Problem 4.8

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top