- #141
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 27,921
- 6,385
Small government causes these problem and makes solutions difficult.Right of way costs too much? Too politically unpopular to condemn that much real estate?
Small government causes these problem and makes solutions difficult.Right of way costs too much? Too politically unpopular to condemn that much real estate?
The population of Texas is nearly half that of the UK.Small government causes these problem and makes solutions difficult.
I can't imagine the cost of the miles of direct burial cable they are going to put in. Any Idea how much it may cost? Got to be millions?Texas is not the only place with concerns. Meanwhile, in California:
Interesting misunderstand there; sorry.The population of Texas is nearly half that of the UK.
The GDP of Texas is nearly 2/3 that of the UK.
Do you call that small?
It varies so much that it's hard to give a single number. This http://sites.utexas.edu/energyinstitute/files/2016/11/UTAustin_FCe_TransmissionCosts_2016.pdfsays $2,500 per MW mile. Underground cables typically 7x more per mile than overhead, so $17,500 per MW mile. The California peak load is about 45 GW, so to transmit 10% of that 500 miles underground, the initial cost would be roughly 45*0.1*1000*17500=$7.8 billion. Those numbers are for transmission, distribution needs a separate calculation.I can't imagine the cost of the miles of direct burial cable they are going to put in. Any Idea how much it may cost? Got to be millions?
I suggest you start a whole new thread on underground power. It's just too far off topic for this thread.@anorlunda
How about the transformers. Will they be underground also? I guess I'm thinking the distribution transformers. Would there be more than two transmission transformers?
Okay, I started a new thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/under-ground-transmission-power-lines.1005587/I suggest you start a whole new thread on underground power. It's just too far off topic for this thread.
Hasn't everything, now? Power and associated utilities cannot be removed from political discussion. They're too closely inter-twined. A capacity market seems the only good way for Texas to continue.This article suggests that Texas will move toward a capacity market. That is what I advocated in this thread under the name ICAP. But they are still letting politicians make the decisions rather than engineers. Worse, it has become a Republican/Democrat politicized issue.
For example, I worked at the NY ISO. In NY the federal regulator (FERC) set broad guidelines. Details of the markets (including whether or not to have a capacity market) were left up to the participants.Power and associated utilities cannot be removed from political discussion.
Very true and neither should they be under the control of Accountants and shareholders.Definitely the domain of the Engineer, IMO.The details of micromanagement should never be embodied in statute law.