Group Action on a Set

Let g= [tex] \left( \begin{array}{ccccc}

1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\

2 & 5 & 4 & 1 & 3 \end{array} \right)

[/tex] be an element of [tex]S_{5}[/tex] and a set S={1,2,3}.



The theorem of a group action says "If a group G acts on a set, this action induces a homomorphism G->A(S), A(S) is the group of all permutations of the set S."



When I apply the above action g on a set S, [tex]1 \mapsto 2, 2 \mapsto 5, 3 \mapsto 4 [/tex], which is not a permutation of a set S.

A group action on a set possibly does not induce a set of its own permutation on set S?

Any opinion will be appreciated.
 
534
1
The problem is that S5 doesn't act on {1, 2, 3} (with the usual action of permutation groups), since 2 is in X, but g(2) = 5 is not in {1, 2, 3}. A group action of G on a set X must send an element of G and an element of X to an element of X; what you show is a map that does not map into {1, 2, 3}, so it cannot be an action on {1, 2, 3}.
 

Related Threads for: Group Action on a Set

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
539
  • Posted
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top