... for the fact that the orbital angular momentum weight is NOT a semi)integer positive number, but an integer.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is there such a reason...? I've never seen it in some book. I know there are other reasons for which we conclude that "l" MUST be an integer, see Sakurai's thoughts attached.

However, orbital angular momentum is a type of angular momentum, the latter which, at quantum level, is the self-adjoint generator of the unitary group representations of the rotation symmetry group [itex] SO(3) [/itex].

So there has to be some group-theoretical reason for which "l" must be an integer and NOT a semi-integer, soe other that Sturm-Liouville theory of PDE-s, etc...(see Sakurai)

Daniel.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Group-theoretical reason

Loading...

Similar Threads for Group theoretical reason | Date |
---|---|

I How a group of nucleus can act as a circular aperture | Apr 5, 2018 |

A Did nature or physicists invent the renormalization group? | Mar 7, 2018 |

I Do the SU(n) generators represent any observables? | Feb 14, 2018 |

A Who wrote "Ch 6 Groups & Representations in QM"? | Jan 11, 2018 |

I Principle of superposition of states | Sep 7, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**