Guantánamo: The War on Human Rights

  • News
  • Thread starter plover
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Human
In summary, David Rose's book "Guantánamo: The War on Human Rights" argues that the policy of detaining and interrogating battlefield prisoners from Afghanistan has resulted in worthless and potentially inaccurate intelligence. The release of innocent detainees has also had negative consequences, with some of them later joining the fight against America. This has caused harm to our moral and political standing in the war on terror. Channel 4 is currently airing a series of films on the topic, highlighting the disturbing actions that we support in the name of protecting freedom.
  • #1
plover
Homework Helper
191
1
An http://inteldump.powerblogs.com/archives/archive_2005_02_20-2005_02_26.shtml#1109378141 [Broken] of the recently released book Guantánamo: The War on Human Rights by David Rose.

Even when you can effectively separate the dangerous from the innocent, coercive interrogations of detainees are likely to produce misleading information. It's possible to argue in the abstract that the policy of detaining and interrogating battlefield prisoners from Afghanistan was wise and prudent given the need to gather intelligence about Al Qaeda. But Rose musters a stronger counterargument that the mechanics of this policy have produced worthless and probably inaccurate intelligence. Only the most seasoned interrogators, armed with volumes of corroborating data, can sort the good confessions from the bad. According to Rose, the U.S. had neither, and was thus unable to verify much of what it learned at Guantanamo.

The release of people assumed to be innocent hasn't gone well either. Recent reports indicate that up to 25 of the 202 prisoners freed from Guantanamo have rejoined the fight in Afghanistan as Taliban or Al Qaeda insurgents. It's not clear whether these men were combatants when they arrived at Gitmo, and improperly screened, or whether their experiences at Gitmo turned them into enemies of America. Guantanamo makes the case that both are very possible. [As argued in this Slate article.]

Our country has paid millions of dollars to build and staff its prison at Guantanamo Bay, but it has paid far more in moral and political capital. By descending to the same illegitimate level as other nations and groups which flout the rule of law, we have ceded key terrain to our enemies in the moral and legal war on terrorism. America may well need to harvest human intelligence through interrogations, and it may also need to detain captured Al Qaeda members for the duration of the war on terror, or of their natural lives — whichever comes first. However, in choosing methods that are both unlawful and ineffective, we have delegitimized our pursuit of this intelligence. And as Rose persuasively argues in Guantanamo, this loss of legitimacy has done grave harm to our efforts to win the war on terror.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Channel 4 are running a short series of films on this topic. It it horrifying the things we passively endorse in the name of preserving freedom.
http://www.channel4.com/news/microsites/T/torture/index.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3



The content of the recently released book Guantánamo: The War on Human Rights by David Rose sheds light on the damaging effects of the U.S.'s policies and actions at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Rose argues that the use of coercive interrogations and the lack of proper screening and verification processes have not only produced misleading information, but have also resulted in the release of innocent individuals who may have been radicalized during their time at Guantanamo.

Furthermore, the author points out that the U.S. has paid a high price in terms of moral and political capital by resorting to unlawful and ineffective methods. By engaging in actions that go against the rule of law, America has lost the moral high ground and has given its enemies ammunition in the ongoing war on terror.

While intelligence gathering and detaining suspected terrorists may be necessary in the fight against terrorism, the methods used at Guantanamo have only delegitimized these efforts and have hindered the U.S.'s ability to effectively combat terrorism. This is a concerning issue that needs to be addressed and corrected in order to restore America's credibility and effectiveness in the war on terror.
 

1. What is Guantánamo Bay and why is it significant?

Guantánamo Bay is a United States military base located in Cuba. It gained significance in the early 2000s when it was used as a detention center for suspected terrorists during the War on Terror.

2. How many people have been detained at Guantánamo Bay?

Since opening in 2002, approximately 780 individuals have been detained at Guantánamo Bay.

3. What are the conditions like for detainees at Guantánamo Bay?

The conditions at Guantánamo Bay have been heavily criticized for being inhumane and violating human rights. Detainees have reported instances of torture, abuse, and prolonged solitary confinement.

4. Have any detainees been released from Guantánamo Bay?

Yes, as of 2021, a total of 779 detainees have been released from Guantánamo Bay. However, many of them were held for several years without being charged or given a fair trial.

5. What is the current status of Guantánamo Bay?

The detention center at Guantánamo Bay is still operational, but the number of detainees has significantly decreased in recent years. Efforts to close the facility have been ongoing, but it remains open due to political and legal challenges.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Back
Top