Gust Load Factor & Wing Bending Explained

In summary, the gust load factor is a measure of how much the normal lift of an airplane increases during a gust.
  • #1
TEST65
4
0
TL;DR Summary
Hi All, Negative Gust (what is the sign of Gust Load Factor , is it for example +6.3 or -6.3)
Hi All

Negative Gust (what is the sign of Gust Load Factor , is it for example +6.3 or -6.3). And does that mean the tips of the wings is going up or down ( if going up does that termed in "English" as Up-Bending of Wing. ?Also, in this case (Negative Gust), if we call inner flange of the top most stringer, is the one closer to the center of Fuselage, Does That Flange under compression of tension.

I will be thankful if somebody help me with this.
Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome, @TEST65 !

The gust load factor is defined as the Lift/Weight ratio of an airplane while subjected to a gust.
Therefore, positive factors are applicable to cases in which the gust increases the normal lift of the airplane (example: nose to tail horizontal gust).

Following the same reasoning, could you describe one condition leading to a negative gust load factor?
Would the wings make a happy or a sad face in that case?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #3
Thank you Lnewqban for your reply. To follow up on your question. I mean in FAA terms and lingo, when we talk about positive gust ( for example FAA says that we have +7.2g Gust (is this a positive Gust or Negative Gust)

1) In Case if this is called positive gust, what is the direction of the air flow of Gust is it : UP d or DOWN?

In Case if the answer is UP : Does that mean the a "FRONTAL" view of airplane makes smiling face?
In This case does that mean that the "SIDE" view of airplane makes smiling view as well?
Which means for any stringer on the belly of the airplane we have compression for inner flange and tension for outer flange if all the above is true then for negative gust (let's say -6.3g from FAA) everything is reversed it that correct?

I attached a picture to clarify more

Thank you in advance,

Cheers!
 

Attachments

  • Positive-GUST.JPG
    Positive-GUST.JPG
    20.2 KB · Views: 89
  • #4
TEST65 said:
I attached a picture to clarify more
To my untrained eye, it looks like your diagram has the aircraft deflection response inverted. I used a Google search on Aircraft gust response or similar to find this article:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/gust-load-factor

1670883940839.png


It looks like a positive gust results in more lift from the wings, which seems intuitive.
 
  • #5
From FAR (Federal Air Regulation) 23.333(c)(1)(i): Positive (up) and negative (down) gusts of 50 f.p.s. at V C must be considered at altitudes...

This assumes that the airplane is in straight and level flight, and right side up (no aerobatics). A positive gust pushes the airplane up. The wing tips bend upward when this happens. There is a famous photo on the internet showing a static test of the Boeing 787 wing simulating a positive load factor:
787 wing test.jpg

The wings bend up under positive loads. Counterintuitively, the horizontal tail bends in the opposite direction in order to get positive pitch stability.
 
  • Wow
Likes FactChecker
  • #6
jrmichler said:
The wing tips bend upward when this happens. There is a famous photo on the internet showing a static test of the Boeing 787 wing simulating a positive load factor:
Holy crapolski! If I were in a window seat (wearing my seatbelt) and looked out the window to see that, I would KMAGB!
 
  • #7
It would take a VERY strong gust from the back or above to cause any significant "load factor". Most gusts in that direction would just reduce the positive load factor. That being said, it can happen that the downward gust is so strong that passengers are thrown against the roof.
There are military standard models for wind and turbulence that are used in airplane design.
 
  • #8
FactChecker said:
It would take a VERY strong gust from the back
A gust from the back would only slightly reduce airspeed, no? And would not be considered positive?
 
  • #9
berkeman said:
A gust from the back would only slightly reduce airspeed, no?
Yes.
berkeman said:
And would not be considered positive?
I always used a Mil-Std gust and turbulence model. If I remember right, we just added its (X,Y,Z) velocities to the steady wind ground velocities.
The full set of models is described here
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and berkeman
  • #10
berkeman said:
Holy crapolski! If I were in a window seat (wearing my seatbelt) and looked out the window to see that, I would KMAGB!
LOL.

The B52's wings were so floppy they had training wheels.
1670891454977.png
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #11
That particular B-52 is low on fuel. With full tanks, the wingtip wheels on both wings would be on the ground. B-52s wings are designed so that they generate lift when the fuselage is level with the ground. When they take off, the wings lift first, after which the rest of the airplane lifts off, after which the pilot rotates.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #12
jrmichler said:
That particular B-52 is low on fuel. With full tanks, the wingtip wheels on both wings would be on the ground. B-52s wings are designed so that they generate lift when the fuselage is level with the ground. When they take off, the wings lift first, after which the rest of the airplane lifts off, after which the pilot rotates.
Yes, exactly right. You can see clearly in this video.


I was privileged to once experience takeoff in an airliner simultaneous with takeoff of a B52 on a parallel runway. It was the perfect vantage point to see the wing flex.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #13
jrmichler said:
From FAR (Federal Air Regulation) 23.333(c)(1)(i): Positive (up) and negative (down) gusts of 50 f.p.s. at V C must be considered at altitudes...

This assumes that the airplane is in straight and level flight, and right side up (no aerobatics). A positive gust pushes the airplane up. The wing tips bend upward when this happens. There is a famous photo on the internet showing a static test of the Boeing 787 wing simulating a positive load factor:
View attachment 318694
The wings bend up under positive loads. Counterintuitively, the horizontal tail bends in the opposite direction in order to get positive pitch stability.
Thank you jrmichler for your reply. I get a hold of the book. As a follow up for a positive Gust (lets say what FAA defines as +7.2) meaning:

1) the gust wind air flow direction is UPWARD
2) Wing tips are going up (smiley face)

Now, are 1) and 2) correct?

If YES, Does this mean also that the nose and tail are going up resulting in fuselage making a smiley face as well:
if the above is correct, does that mean the inner flange ( the flange closer to the center of the fuselage) of a stringer at the lowest part of fuselage (at the belly) going through COMPRESSION, or I am wrong.

Mind you the last conclusion was based on previous stated (assumed) comments.

Thank you in advance and looking to more conversations.

Cheers!
 
  • #14
FactChecker said:
It would take a VERY strong gust from the back or above to cause any significant "load factor". Most gusts in that direction would just reduce the positive load factor. That being said, it can happen that the downward gust is so strong that passengers are thrown against the roof.
There are military standard models for wind and turbulence that are used in airplane design.
Thank you FactChecker for your reply. I get a hold of the book. As a follow up for a positive Gust (lets say what FAA defines as +7.2) meaning:

1) the gust wind air flow direction is UPWARD
2) Wing tips are going up (smiley face)

Now, are 1) and 2) correct?

If YES, Does this mean also that the nose and tail are going up resulting in fuselage making a smiley face as well:
if the above is correct, does that mean the inner flange ( the flange closer to the center of the fuselage) of a stringer at the lowest part of fuselage (at the belly) going through COMPRESSION, or I am wrong.

Mind you the last conclusion was based on previous stated (assumed) comments.

Thank you in advance and looking to more conversations.

Cheers!
 
  • #15
TEST65 said:
Thank you FactChecker for your reply. I get a hold of the book. As a follow up for a positive Gust (lets say what FAA defines as +7.2) meaning:
I don't have the FAR book if that is what you are referring to. Perhaps you are confusing me with @jrmichler .
TEST65 said:
1) the gust wind air flow direction is UPWARD
2) Wing tips are going up (smiley face)

Now, are 1) and 2) correct?

If YES, Does this mean also that the nose and tail are going up resulting in fuselage making a smiley face as well:
Keep in mind that the force from the tail is not usually what people expect. To counteract the nose-down rotational force from the wing, the tail usually provides a downward aerodynamic force.
TEST65 said:
if the above is correct, does that mean the inner flange ( the flange closer to the center of the fuselage) of a stringer at the lowest part of fuselage (at the belly) going through COMPRESSION, or I am wrong.
I have no knowledge of structural forces on an airplane.
 

1. What is gust load factor?

Gust load factor refers to the amount of force that a gust of wind exerts on an aircraft. It is typically measured in terms of the aircraft's weight and is an important factor in determining the structural strength and stability of the aircraft.

2. How does gust load factor affect an aircraft's wings?

Gust load factor can cause the wings of an aircraft to bend and flex, which can put stress on the structural components of the wings. This stress can potentially lead to structural failure if the wings are not designed to withstand the gust load factor.

3. What is wing bending?

Wing bending refers to the deformation of an aircraft's wings due to external forces, such as gust load factor. The wings are designed to bend and flex to a certain degree in order to absorb the forces and maintain the stability of the aircraft.

4. How do engineers account for gust load factor in aircraft design?

Engineers use a combination of mathematical calculations, computer simulations, and wind tunnel testing to determine the maximum expected gust load factor for a specific aircraft. This information is then used to design the wings and other structural components to withstand the expected forces.

5. Can gust load factor be dangerous for an aircraft?

Yes, if an aircraft experiences gust load factors that exceed its design limits, it can lead to structural failure and potentially cause a crash. This is why it is important for engineers to carefully consider gust load factor in the design and testing of aircraft.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
14K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • General Engineering
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top