1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Half value thickness for lead

  1. Jan 6, 2009 #1
    Determine the half value thickness, X(1/2) for lead where;
    I = 0.4 MeV
    u = 1.59cm^-1

    I = Io e^-ux

    ln(I/Io) = ln(e) -ux
    ln(2) / -1.59x10^-2 = X(1/2)

    => X(1/2) = -1.7523m

    Is that right?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 6, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Firstly I=0,4MeV is an energy not an intensity.
    Your 'u' seems to already be a half thickness.
    Are you sure of the units of [tex]\mu[/tex], it's normally a bulk absorption ie cm2/g
  4. Jan 6, 2009 #3
    Hi, thanks for your answers!

    The mU I have stated is the linear absorption coefficient and therefore rated in the units of "per cm" and your right that that's energy, not intensity, but as you would need to do the same things to both the first (I) and the second value (Io) to convert them to intensity (and its one divided by the other), it will always come out as 2 for (I/Io) in order to get the half value thickness, therefore you can make 'I' any value and any units and the answer will be the same, its just the linear absorption coefficient that's important... right? Or perhaps Im missing the point?
  5. Jan 6, 2009 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You can't say I=0.4mev - just checking you weren't confused with something else.
    Your method is almost correct

    You want the intensity to reduce to 0.5, so I=0.5 if Io=1
    so so ln(I/Io) = ln(0.5) = -ux

    There's no need to convert into m.
    Then you can check your answer by putting it back into the equation and checking you get
    0.5 = e ^ -1.59 x
  6. Jan 6, 2009 #5
    ahhh, I see! I was on the whole, the symbol with the 'o' after it is normally lower, where as for this one its higher as it decreases over distance! Must have been a long day as I totally missed that one! Plus, as its 'per cm' I was going the wrong way on converting it to m!

    So we have;
    X(1/2) = ln(0.5) / (-1.59) = 0.436cm

    Thank you!
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?