Solving for y(t): The Mystery Revealed

  • Thread starter Larsson
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mystery
In summary: You know Larsson, I'd like to know what the solution is to this problem. Me, I'd rewrite it as:ty^{''}+y^{'}=t\delta_2(t)Taking the Laplace transform of both sides results in:-sY-s^2Y^{'}=2e^{-2s}Solving for Y I get:Y(s)=-\frac{2}{s}\text{Ei}(-2s)+\frac{c}{s}where Ei[x] is the exponential integral function.Inverting I get:y(t)=2\
  • #1
Larsson
28
0
(t*y'(t))' = t*Dirac(t-2), t>0
we know that y(t) = 1 lim t--> o+
solve for y(t)

the solution says that by using
f(t)*Dirac_a(t) = f(a) * Dirac_a(t) we get

(t*y'(t))' = 2*Dirac(t-2) Dont see how they get that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ah, by "Dirac" you mean the Dirac delta function, not the Dirac operator.

Yes, the second equation is applied to the first to convert the "t" to the value "2". Another way of putting this.

Since Dirac(t-2) is zero except when t=2, you might as well go replace t with 2 everywhere that is multplied by Dirac(t-2).

Hope this helps.

Carl
 
  • #3
You know Larsson, I'd like to know what the solution is to this problem. Me, I'd rewrite it as:

[tex]ty^{''}+y^{'}=t\delta_2(t)[/tex]

Taking the Laplace transform of both sides results in:

[tex]-sY-s^2Y^{'}=2e^{-2s}[/tex]

Solving for Y I get:

[tex]Y(s)=-\frac{2}{s}\text{Ei}(-2s)+\frac{c}{s}[/tex]

where Ei[x] is the exponential integral function.

Inverting I get:

[tex]y(t)=2\text{ln}(t/2)\text{UnitStep}(t-2)+c[/tex]

You said the limit of y(t) as t goes to zero is 1 so I'd let c=1. However, I'm not very confident of this as the question of initial conditions for both the DE in t and the DE in s is not well defined in my mind. What is your solution?
 
  • #4
Almost correct. + A*ln(t) and you're right


While we're at it I have another:

find a function y which you can apply to

y'(t) - int(2*sin(t - tau) * y(tau) d tau tau = 0 .. t) = cos(t) y(0) = -1/2

Bt using the definition of convolution I get that it can be written

y'(t) - 2 sin(t)* y(t) = cos(t)

laplacetransformation gives

sY +1/2 - 2/(s^2+1) * Y = s/(s^2+1)

Y (s - 2/(s^2+1)) = s/(s^2+1) - 1/2

Y ( s(s^2+1) - 2) = s - (s^2 + 1)/2

Y = s/(s(s^2+1) - 2) - (s^2 + 1)/(2*(s^2 + 1))

and from here everything just crashes, don't get anything that makes sence
 
  • #5
Larsson said:
Almost correct. + A*ln(t) and you're right

Thanks, I'll spend more time with it as I think it's an interesting problem.

While we're at it I have another:
find a function y which you can apply to
y'(t) - int(2*sin(t - tau) * y(tau) d tau tau = 0 .. t) = cos(t) y(0) = -1/2

Looks like:

[tex]y^{'}-2\int_0^t Sin[t-\tau]y(\tau)d\tau=Cos[t],\quad y(0)=1/2[/tex]

That too is very interesting. I'll work with it too.:smile:
 
  • #6
Larsson said:
y'(t) - 2 sin(t)* y(t) = cos(t)

An obvious solution to the homogeneous problem is

[tex]y(t) = c \; e^{-2\cos(t)}[/tex]

One of my old physics professors would say that a solution to the inhomogeneous problem can be obtained by a "simple quadrature".

Carl
 
Last edited:

1. What is "Solving for y(t): The Mystery Revealed"?

"Solving for y(t): The Mystery Revealed" is a scientific concept that involves solving for the dependent variable, y, in terms of the independent variable, t. It is commonly used in mathematical and scientific equations to model relationships between variables.

2. Why is solving for y(t) important?

Solving for y(t) allows scientists to understand and predict the behavior of a system or phenomenon. By solving for y, we can determine the relationship between variables and make accurate predictions or calculations.

3. What are the steps involved in solving for y(t)?

The first step is to identify the independent and dependent variables in the equation. Then, we use mathematical operations such as substitution, elimination, and integration to isolate y on one side of the equation and t on the other. Finally, we can solve for y by plugging in values for t.

4. What are some real-world examples of solving for y(t)?

One example is using the equation y=mx+b to model the relationship between distance (y) and time (t) for a moving object. Another example is using the equation for radioactive decay, y=ae^-kt, to predict the amount of a radioactive substance (y) remaining after a certain amount of time (t).

5. Are there any limitations to solving for y(t)?

Yes, there can be limitations depending on the complexity of the equation and the accuracy of the data. Additionally, some equations may not have a closed-form solution for y, making it difficult to solve for y(t) analytically. In these cases, numerical methods may be used to approximate the solution.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
570
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
222
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
321
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
372
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
330
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
991
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
354
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
282
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
442
Back
Top