Solving a Hard Energy Physics Problem: Pendulum Cut Question

In summary: But when the ball is cut from the string, does it have potential and kinetic energy? I mean it is still moving? In the X at least... How can we not consider this part of the question?Yes, the ball still has energy after it's cut from the string.
  • #1
fobbz
27
0

Homework Statement




http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/1115/pendulumcutquestion.jpg [Broken]


Please ignore the blue pen.

Homework Equations


Ek=1/2 mv2
Ep=mgh


The Attempt at a Solution



Basically I looked at the problem firstly as the pendulum has reached the lowest point, therefore having an Ep of 0 and an Ek . Then I took a final point, where the string is cut. At this point there is Ek and Ep is there not?

The height would therefore be from the bottom of the swing, to the place where it's cut, which equals

6.4 - 6.4cos(30)

So now I have this

Ek= Ek2 + Ep
0.5mv2 = 0.5m(vsin30)2 + mgh


Am I on the right track?

What do I do after this? I don't know what my next move should be...

Should I use the point where the string is cut , and set it equal to the ball at the top of the height's energy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's hard to say if you're on the right track or not, since you haven't provided a clear statement of what some of your formulas are meant to represent. Also you've used the variable 'v' on both sides of an energy equation, so what does the formula mean?

I think if you can put a number to the velocity of the bob at position Y then you'll be making excellent progress. What's the KE of the bob at point Y?
 
  • #3
You're almost there, but your energy equation is a little off. Total energy is conserved, so find the speed at the height 6.4 - 6.4cos(30). (You start off with all potential energy, and end up with potential and kinetic energy.) Once you know the speed, you can find the vertical velocity, because you know that the path of the ball with be orthogonal to a line drawn from the ball to the point where the string is fixed.
 
  • #4
Okay so this is what I've done.

I've taken the Ep (energy potential) when the ball is at the top (position X) and set it equal to the Ek (energy kinetic) and the new Ep2 at position Y, Thus obtaining the following:

Ep = Ep2 + Ek
mg(6.4) = mg(6.4-6.4cos(30)) + 0.5mv2

Solving for v, I get 9.9m/s


Now, I am looking at the problem starting at position Y and resulting at the max point of h.

So

Ep2 + Ek = Ep3 + Ek2


Ek2 = .5(9.9sin30)2

And solving for h I get 4.6

Is this right? Or does Ek2 not exist since the ball is no longer traveling in the y direction?!
 
  • #5
You can find the energy when the pendulum is in position X since the only energy is potential, the diagram also gives you the length of the pendulum and the angle at which the rope is cut therefore you can find the potential energy at this point; the difference in these potentials is the kinetic energy at this point, from this and the angle you have you can find the vertical velocity and a kinematics equation will give you your max height (or another energy conservation application if that's more your style)
 
  • #6
JHamm said:
You can find the energy when the pendulum is in position X since the only energy is potential, the diagram also gives you the length of the pendulum and the angle at which the rope is cut therefore you can find the potential energy at this point; the difference in these potentials is the kinetic energy at this point, from this and the angle you have you can find the vertical velocity and a kinematics equation will give you your max height (or another energy conservation application if that's more your style)

Okay so I did this, and it makes perfect sense to me! I used the V'2 = Vi2 -2ad formula and I got 3.43m which I believe is correct.

How would I use another energy conservation application though to solve for the answer? I don't really know what to have as an equation.
 
  • #7
Just ignore any horizontal displacement. Imagine that you have a ball that is tossed up with some vertical velocity. How high does it go above where it is released? You might be making this problem more complicated than it is.
 
  • #8
gnulinger said:
Just ignore any horizontal displacement. Imagine that you have a ball that is tossed up with some vertical velocity. How high does it go above where it is released? You might be making this problem more complicated than it is.

I know the concept, I mean I just don't really understand it written out in an equation.

When the ball is cut from the string, and it's at the highest point, it has potential energy and kinetic energy does it not? I mean it is still moving? In the X at least... How can we not consider this part of the question?

I apologize if I sound stupid, maybe I'm missing something...
 
  • #9
You don't sound stupid at all, in fact what you said is entirely true :)
Try this, if I have a ball with a vertical velocity of [itex]1ms^{-1}[/itex] and it reaches a height [itex]h[/itex] then I take this same ball and fire it with a velocity of [itex]2ms^{-1}[/itex] at an angle of [itex]30^o[/itex] how high will it go?
 
  • #10
It will go the same height as the last one, as 2sin(30) = 1 m/s !

So basically, I understand that. It's just, now, what do we take from this into the question?
 

1. What is "hard energy physics"?

"Hard energy physics" refers to the study of high-energy particles and interactions using particle accelerators. These particles can travel close to the speed of light and have very high energies, making them difficult to observe and study using traditional methods.

2. What are some examples of hard energy physics problems?

Examples of hard energy physics problems include studying the properties of the Higgs boson, searching for new particles beyond the Standard Model, and understanding the strong nuclear force that binds quarks together in protons and neutrons.

3. How do scientists study hard energy physics?

Scientists use powerful particle accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider, to accelerate particles to high energies and collide them together. They then observe the particles and their interactions using specialized detectors and analyze the data collected.

4. Why is hard energy physics important?

Hard energy physics is important because it helps us understand the fundamental building blocks of matter and the forces that govern the universe. It also has practical applications, such as in medical imaging and radiation therapy.

5. What are some current challenges in hard energy physics?

Some current challenges in hard energy physics include finding evidence for new particles and phenomena beyond the Standard Model, improving the precision of measurements, and developing new technologies to improve the capabilities of particle accelerators and detectors.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
308
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
996
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
977
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top