Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Has anyone seen this scalar?

  1. Mar 13, 2006 #1
    In my calculations, I come across the scalar
    [tex]R^{ji} R_{ij} - R^2[/tex]
    ([tex]R_{ij}[/tex] is the Ricci tensor, [tex]R[/tex] is the Ricci scalar)
    More specifically, I come across the integral of this scalar over a compact manifold.
    Has anyone seen it before, and does it have any nice properties?

    John Schulman
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 13, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    It seems to me...
    Up to a constant factor, that scalar is the second principal-invariant of the Ricci tensor. It is proportional to the second elementary symmetric function of its eigenvalues. How does it arise? (I've been interested in this invariant [not necessarily for Ricci] and have been searching for a geometrical interpretation [and physical interpretation] for it.)
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2006
  4. Mar 13, 2006 #3

    [tex]R^{ji} R_{ij} = R[/tex]

    it follows that

    [tex]R^{ji} R_{ij} - R^2 = R - R^2 = R(1 - R)[/tex]

    That's about all I can see about it.

  5. Mar 14, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    No. [itex]R=R_{ij} g^{ij}[/itex]. The Ricci scalar has units, by the way...

    I have no idea if the original poster is looking for a purely mathematical answer or not, but if Einstein's equations hold, and you have a perfect fluid with density [itex]\rho[/itex] and pressure [itex]p[/itex], that scalar is proportional to [itex]p(\rho-p)[/itex]. Normally, [itex]\rho \gg p[/itex], so the square root of your scalar is basically a geometric average of the density and pressure.
  6. Mar 14, 2006 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    In my earlier post, I was too lazy to write
    [tex]R^{ji} R_{ij} - R^2=2R^i{}_{[j}R^j{}_{i]}[/tex],
    where I've used the metric to raise and lower indices.
  7. Mar 14, 2006 #6
    Thanks for the responses, especially robphy. I'll do a little research about the eigenvalues of [tex]R^{i}_j[/tex].

    Here's how I came across this quantity:
    I'm working in a rather specific area: I'm studying the relationship between the curvature of a Kahler supermanifold with the curvature of the underlying complex manifold.
    I found that if a supermanifold with two "fermionic" dimensions satisfies [tex]R=0[/tex] then there's a scalar differential equation with some curvature tensors that the underlying complex "bosonic" manifold must satisfy. This equation has a bunch of terms in it, but if we take the integral of the expression over a compact manifold, we get
    [tex]\int (R^{ji} R_{ij} - R^2) dV=0[/tex]

    Here's the consequence of this calculation that interests me:
    If I can find a complex manifold where the above integral CAN'T equal zero regardless of metric, it is likely that I will be able to disprove a certain conjecture concerning Yau's theorem generalized to supermanifolds. Unfortunately, I don't know if such a manifold exists.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Has anyone seen this scalar?
  1. Scalar Equations! (Replies: 3)

  2. About Scalars (Replies: 25)

  3. Time is scalar? (Replies: 3)

  4. Scalar or vector? (Replies: 5)

  5. Studying scalar fields (Replies: 7)