Has Google Made A Giant Leap?

  • I
  • Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Google
In summary, IBM and Google disagree on the quantum supremacy achievement. IBM believes that the quantum computer has not yet reached the quantum supremacy threshold, while Google believes that it has. However, even if the quantum supremacy threshold has not been reached, the advances in quantum computing are still impressive.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
bhobba said:
Is this the breakthrough of the century?

If it turns out that QC is practical for many purposes and allows the calculation of things that were impossible without it (like a determination of the equilibrium constant for the binding of an inhibitor molecule to an enzyme without doing an actual lab experiment), it may be the breakthrough of the century. However, with the current knowledge it's not even clear whether it's more important than the Higgs boson and gravitational wave findings that have also been done during the first 20 years of this century.
 
  • #4
I read that IBM seriously disputes their claim that they're quantum computer can do in a couple of minutes something that today's supercomputers would take 10,000 years to do. IBM says it would take about 2 1/2 days. Still impressive, but not what Google's claiming.
 
  • #5
Thanks for posting the info and links. I heard about it a couple of days ago, but for some reason I didn't check it out further, I don't know why.

Maybe the achievement is in a superposition of being a small step and a giant leap. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #6
I just saw a video about this which I think was remarkably good for coming from a news agency, so I wanted to share it here. It describes quantum computing from various viewpoints, and also describes the engineering and the qubits in a bit more detail than usual introductions to the subject. Scott Aaronson is also interviewed, and there are many nice shots of the hardware involved.

The Hype Over Quantum Computers, Explained (CNBC Jan 10, 2020)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #7
bhobba said:
I was thinking another person might post about this:
https://www.livescience.com/google-hits-quantum-supremacy.html
Is this the breakthrough of the century?
berkeman said:
Not yet! See
where one can read:
“We are only one creative algorithm away from valuable near-term applications,” the researchers wrote in the Nature paper.
The same can be said about any not yet achieved breakthrough!
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #9
  • Haha
Likes phinds
  • #10
https://www.science.org/content/art...-can-beat-google-s-quantum-computer-after-all

Ordinary computers can beat Google’s quantum computer after all
Superfast algorithm put crimp in 2019 claim that Google’s machine had achieved “quantum supremacy”


The researchers calculated the output pattern for 1 million of the 9 quadrillion possible number strings, relying on an innovation of their own to obtain a truly random, representative set. The computation took 15 hours on 512 GPUs and yielded the telltale spiky output. “It’s fair to say that the Google experiment has been simulated on a conventional computer,” says Dominik Hangleiter, a quantum computer scientist at the University of Maryland, College Park. On a supercomputer, the computation would take a few dozen seconds, Zhang says—10 billion times faster than the Google team estimated.

The advance underscores the pitfalls of racing a quantum computer against a conventional one, researchers say. “There’s an urgent need for better quantum supremacy experiments,” Aaronson says. Zhang suggests a more practical approach: “We should find some real-world applications to demonstrate the quantum advantage.”
It looks like IBM was correct.
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2019/10/on-quantum-supremacy/
Quantum computers are starting to approach the limit of classical simulation and it is important that we continue to benchmark progress and to ask how difficult they are to simulate. This is a fascinating scientific question.

Recent advances in quantum computing have resulted in two 53-qubit processors: one from our group in IBM and a device described by Google in a paper published in the journal Nature. In the paper, it is argued that their device reached “quantum supremacy” and that “a state-of-the-art supercomputer would require approximately 10,000 years to perform the equivalent task.” We argue that an ideal simulation of the same task can be performed on a classical system in 2.5 days and with far greater fidelity. This is in fact a conservative, worst-case estimate, and we expect that with additional refinements the classical cost of the simulation can be further reduced.

Because the original meaning of the term “quantum supremacy,” as proposed by John Preskill in 2012, was to describe the point where quantum computers can do things that classical computers can’t, this threshold has not been met.

This particular notion of “quantum supremacy” is based on executing a random quantum circuit of a size infeasible for simulation with any available classical computer. Specifically, the paper shows a computational experiment over a 53-qubit quantum processor that implements an impressively large two-qubit gate quantum circuit of depth 20, with 430 two-qubit and 1,113 single-qubit gates, and with predicted total fidelity of 0.2%. Their classical simulation estimate of 10,000 years is based on the observation that the RAM memory requirement to store the full state vector in a Schrödinger-type simulation would be prohibitive, and thus one needs to resort to a Schrödinger-Feynman simulation that trades off space for time.
 
  • Informative
Likes atyy, DennisN, hutchphd and 2 others

1. What is the giant leap that Google has made?

Google has made several giant leaps in its history, but the most recent one is the development of its quantum computer, called Sycamore. This quantum computer has the ability to perform calculations that would take traditional computers thousands of years to complete.

2. How does Google's quantum computer work?

Google's quantum computer uses quantum bits, or qubits, to store and process information. Unlike traditional computers that use binary bits (0s and 1s), qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for much faster processing and more complex calculations.

3. What are the potential applications of Google's quantum computer?

Google's quantum computer has the potential to revolutionize many industries, such as finance, healthcare, and transportation. It could also be used for more efficient and accurate simulations, data analysis, and machine learning.

4. How does Google's quantum computer compare to other quantum computers?

Google's quantum computer is currently the most powerful and advanced quantum computer in the world. However, other companies and research institutions are also working on developing quantum computers, and there is still much progress to be made in this field.

5. Will Google's quantum computer replace traditional computers?

It is unlikely that Google's quantum computer will completely replace traditional computers. While it has the potential to solve certain problems much faster, traditional computers are still better suited for everyday tasks and will continue to be used for many purposes.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
835
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
539
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
737
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
954
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
861
Replies
3
Views
895
Back
Top