Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I had a question about understanding some basic thing about the Hausdorff dimension. Specifically, I'm trying to understand why the two dimensional Hausdorff dimension of a 1-d line is zero.

In terms of the two dimensional Lebesgue measure, I can see that I can cover the line by a countable union of rectangles, where each rectangle has length of one coordinate = 0.

For example, Suppose the line is [0,1] and lies on the x axis. Then I can cover it with rectangles with their length in the y dimension zero, and in the end, I would have to sum up the measure of each rectangle, and each rectangle would have

m( A_{i} x B_{i} ) = m(A_{i}) m_(B_{i}) = 0. (where A_{i} is in X and B_{i} is in Y)

So I can see how a two dimensional Lebesgue measure of a one dimensional line is zero.

However for Hausdorff measures, I have to use circles to cover the line. I'm not able to visualize this. Can I make the radius so small that it only covers a single number? But in that case I would need an uncountable number of circles? I'm confused since the definition of a Hausdorff measure only lets me control the radius of the n-balls and not anything else, so I can't understand how to play around with the radius to make the two Hausdorff measure zero when covering a line in 1 dimension.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Hausdorff Dimension

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Hausdorff Dimension

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**