Having Trouble with QM Problem

  • Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Qm
In summary, the problem is that I'm not too confident with this stuff yet, and I'm not sure how to proceed from here.
  • #1
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,199
38
I posted a small question about part of this problem earlier and got some tips that kept me going for a while. However, I'm still having trouble and I fear that my approach to the problem may be fundamentally wrong, since I'm not too confident with this stuff yet. So I thought I'd post the entire problem and my attempt at solving it so far:

Given the following one-dimensional potential [tex] \inline{ V(x) = -g\delta(x) -g\delta(x-a)} [/tex] where [tex] \inline g [/tex] and [tex] \inline a [/tex] are positive constansts:

a) Graph the potential

This seemed easy enough. The difference between the two delta functions would be 0-0 everywhere except at x = 0, where the potential would equal [tex] \inline{ -\infty} [/tex], and at x = a, where it would also be [tex] \inline{ -\infty} [/tex]. So the graph of the potential would consist of two vertical lines starting at the x-axis at those two points and going down to negative infinity. Correct?

b) Solve the time-independent Schrodinger equation for E < 0

My approach was as follows. We derived the time independent equation in class. Assuming the wave function has the following form:

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \psi(x)T(t) [/tex]

then: [tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} + V\psi = E\psi [/tex]

I then divided the area being considered into three regions:

i) x < 0

[tex] E < 0 \therefore E = -|E| [/tex]

So: [tex] \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = -\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(-|E|)\psi [/tex]

[tex] \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = \frac{2m|E|}{\hbar^2}\psi [/tex]

Solving this differential equation:

[tex] \psi(x) = Ae^{\kappa x} + Be^{-\kappa x} [/tex]

where [tex] \inline{\kappa^2 = \frac{2m|E|}{\hbar^2}} [/tex]

As far as I know, in the other regions, the differential equation ends up being the same, so we have:

ii) 0 < x < a

[tex] \psi(x) = Ce^{\kappa x} + De^{-\kappa x} [/tex]

iii) x > a

[tex] \psi(x) = Fe^{\kappa x} + Ge^{-\kappa x} [/tex]

It also seemed to me that as [tex] \inline{ x \rightarrow -\infty, Be^{-\kappa x} \rightarrow \infty }[/tex]

and as [tex] \inline{ x \rightarrow \infty, Fe^{\kappa x} \rightarrow \infty }[/tex]

Neither of these situations is physically possible, so [tex] \inline{ B = F = 0 }[/tex]

One continuity condition is [tex] \inline{ \psi(0^+) = \psi(0^-) }[/tex]

[tex] Ae^0 = Ce^0 + De^0 \Rightarrow A = C + D [/tex]

Also: [tex] \inline{ \psi(a^+) = \psi(a^-) }[/tex]

[tex] Ce^{\kappa a} + De^{-\kappa a} = Ge^{-\kappa a} [/tex]

[tex] Ce^{2\kappa a} + D = G [/tex]
and so [tex] Ge^{-\kappa x} = Ce^{\kappa(2a-x)} + De^{-\kappa x} [/tex]

To summarise, my solution is:

[tex]\psi(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{cc}Ae^{\kappa x} & x < 0 \\Ce^{\kappa x} + De^{-\kappa x} & 0 < x < a\\Ce^{\kappa(2a-x)} + De^{-\kappa x} & x > a \end{array} [/tex]

[tex] (A = C + D) [/tex]

This may or may not satisfy my prof's requirements for part (b), but I decided to continue in the same way as the example problems in my notes did by integrating Schrodinger's equation:

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx} -g\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\delta (x)\psi(x)dx} -g\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\delta(x-a)\psi(x)dx} = E\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\psi dx}[/tex]

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}[\psi'(\epsilon) - \psi'(-\epsilon)] - g\psi(0) - g\psi(a) = 0 [/tex]

Take the limit as [tex] \inline{ \epsilon \rightarrow 0} [/tex] :

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}[\psi'(0^+) - \psi'(0^-)] - g\psi(0) - g\psi(a) = 0 [/tex]

[tex] \frac{d\psi}{dx} = \left\{\begin{array}{cc}A\kappa e^{\kappa x} & x < 0 \\C\kappa e^{\kappa x} - D\kappa e^{-\kappa x} & 0 < x < a\end{array} [/tex]

And so [tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}[(C\kappa - D\kappa) - (C\kappa + D\kappa)] - g\psi(0) - g\psi(a) = 0 [/tex]

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}(-2D\kappa) = g(C+D) + g(Ce^{\kappa a} + De^{\kappa a}) [/tex]

As it must be clear by now, I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing, and I'm at a loss how to proceed from here. If I had some inkling, then I wouldn't have bothered posting all of this. I'd really appreciate some help with this problem. The last two parts of the question are:

c) Find the energy of the bound states (i.e. E < 0).
d) Find normalized eigen-functions for the energies in part (c).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No replies...?

Look, I hate to resort to bumping my own thread...but I'm really in a bind here, and as you can see, I'm not asking for a freebie here. I've put a lot of work into this so far and have been thinking about it non-stop. Nevertheless, I'm just not clear enough on this material for that to be fruitful, so I'd really appreciate any assistance that you could offer.

Thanks
 
  • #3
cepheid said:
Look, I hate to resort to bumping my own thread...but I'm really in a bind here, and as you can see, I'm not asking for a freebie here.

Right, but speaking for myself I actually have to do the problem to answer your question.

Sit tight, I'll get back to you later today.
 
  • #4
also remeber to take into account the continuity of the wave function at both x = 0 and x = a, this will help you along...

dt
 
  • #5
Hmm...

cepheid said:
One continuity condition is [tex] \inline{ \psi(0^+) = \psi(0^-) }[/tex]

[tex] Ae^0 = Ce^0 + De^0 \Rightarrow A = C + D [/tex]

Also: [tex] \inline{ \psi(a^+) = \psi(a^-) }[/tex]

[tex] Ce^{\kappa a} + De^{-\kappa a} = Ge^{-\kappa a} [/tex]

[tex] Ce^{2\kappa a} + D = G [/tex]
and so [tex] Ge^{-\kappa x} = Ce^{\kappa(2a-x)} + De^{-\kappa x} [/tex]

Interesting Dr Transport. That's what I thought I was doing here^^. But maybe you were referring to something else that I'm missing??

btw Tom...I apologise for my impatience before.
 
  • #6
Sorry, but I've still no idea how to proceed with this. Have I gone wrong somewhere? I've posted everything I did so far. Help is much appreciated, thanks.
 
  • #7
You've integrated incorrectly in:

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}dx} -g\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\delta (x)\psi(x)dx} -g\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\delta(x-a)\psi(x)dx} = E\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}{\psi dx}[/tex]

The integral over the second delta function is 0, since the interval [itex]-\epsilon<x<\epsilon[/itex] does not contain x=a.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Good point!

That simplifies matters considerably. Thanks!
 
  • #9
Or not...

So instead I get:

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}[(C\kappa - D\kappa) - (C\kappa + D\kappa)] - g\psi(0) = 0 [/tex]

Which gives me:

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}(-2D\kappa) = g(C+D) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\hbar^2 D\kappa}{m} = gA [/tex]

[tex] \kappa = \frac{mgA}{\hbar^2 d} [/tex]

And since [tex] \kappa^2 = \frac{2m|E|}{\hbar^2} [/tex]

We get: [tex] |E| = \frac{m^2 g^2 A^2 \hbar^2}{2m\hbar^4 D^2} [/tex]

Hopefully that answers part c. I don't know. It bothers me that A and D are still there.

Now for the normalization: [tex] \int{\psi^*\psi}dx = 1 [/tex]

I get: [tex] A^2\int_{-\infty}^{0} {e^{2 \kappa x}}dx + \int_{0}^{a} {(Ce^{\kappa x} + De^{-\kappa x})^2}dx + \int_{a}^{\infty} {(Ce^{\kappa(2a-x)} + De^{-\kappa x} )^2dx =1 [/tex]

:eek: Any suggestions?!?!
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I've no idea how to evaluate/simplify that^
 
  • #11
^In previous examples it involved combining the integrals somehow, but that doesn't seem possible here
 
  • #12
Well anyways, I gave up on it, so I guess that's that. Thanks to all those who did reply, although I have to say that for a thread that's been going on for more than ten days, the response was not what I had hoped, especially since I took great pains to show what work I had done.

I'm not saying that I don't still want help learning how to solve the problem, I'm just saying that based on the past few days, I'm confident that that help will not be forthcoming.
 
  • #13
cepheid said:
Well anyways, I gave up on it, so I guess that's that. Thanks to all those who did reply, although I have to say that for a thread that's been going on for more than ten days, the response was not what I had hoped, especially since I took great pains to show what work I had done.

I'm not saying that I don't still want help learning how to solve the problem, I'm just saying that based on the past few days, I'm confident that that help will not be forthcoming.

Cepheid,

this is a weird problem, you'd better ask your teacher to explain it if you have given such a problem for beginner students. You did everything well, but you do not have enough skills yet. The normal way of solving a Schroedinger equation is as you did. You assume a solution function, you get two parameters, [tex] \pm \kappa[/tex]. You combined the wavefunction from these functions using constants, A, B, C, G. Now you need to eliminate all the constants but one. For these, you use the continuity of the wavefunction and the conditions for its derivative. For this, you used one at x=0, but missed the other, at x=a. If you write the integral from [tex](a-\epsilon ) [/tex] to [tex] (a + \epsilon ) [/tex] you get an other relationship between C , D and G. Now you can express C and D with both A and G. Eliminate C and D, and you get two homogeneous equation for A and G. This system of equations has nontrivial solutions only (that is not A=0 and G=0) if its determinant is zero. From that condition you get an equation for [tex] \kappa [/tex]. This equation is transcendental. Something like [tex] m \kappa = 1 \pm \exp (- \kappa a) [/tex], m being a constant that contains m, g and [tex]\hbar [/tex]. The next step is to express G with A , and then C and D with A using the value of [tex] \kappa [/tex] you got to built up the wavefunction. As it contains only one free parameter now, you can calculate it (in principle) from the normality condition.
This is a lot of work, and I am not sure if there is no other solution. Working with delta potentials is really difficult.

ehild
 
  • #14
The one thing I have not seen in any other posts to this is the following: continuity of the wave function at [tex] x = a/2 [/tex]. There will then be a boundary condition relating C and D. This problem has intrigued me a little, so I'll try to sit down and work on it some.

dt
 

1. How can I improve my understanding of quantum mechanics?

To improve your understanding of quantum mechanics, it is important to have a strong foundation in mathematics, particularly linear algebra and calculus. Additionally, reading textbooks and practicing problem-solving techniques can also enhance your understanding. It may also be helpful to discuss difficult concepts with peers or seek guidance from a mentor.

2. Why do I struggle with solving quantum mechanics problems?

Solving quantum mechanics problems can be challenging because it requires a different way of thinking compared to classical mechanics. It involves understanding abstract concepts and applying mathematical principles in a non-intuitive way. It is also a complex and constantly evolving field, so it is natural to encounter difficulties along the way.

3. How can I approach a quantum mechanics problem effectively?

First, it is essential to carefully read and understand the problem statement. Then, identify the key concepts and principles involved. Next, decide on an appropriate mathematical approach to solving the problem and make sure to show all steps in your solution. Finally, check your answer to ensure it makes physical and mathematical sense.

4. What resources can I use to help me with quantum mechanics problems?

There are many resources available to help with quantum mechanics problems, such as textbooks, online lectures and tutorials, and study groups. Your professor or teaching assistant may also provide additional resources or hold office hours to assist with any difficulties. It can also be helpful to look for practice problems and solutions to test your understanding.

5. What are some common mistakes to avoid when solving quantum mechanics problems?

Some common mistakes to avoid when solving quantum mechanics problems include not carefully reading the problem statement, not fully understanding the concepts involved, and not showing all steps in the solution. It is also crucial to pay attention to units and make sure they are consistent throughout the problem. Additionally, avoid making assumptions or using classical mechanics principles in a quantum mechanics problem.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
765
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
270
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
913
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top