Hawking Radiation

  • Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date
  • #1
jaydnul
531
15
Something I don't understand is how the energy is subtracted from the black hole. So let's say one pair of virtual particles pop up on the event horizon, the particle goes in, the antiparticle goes out. Then let's say that a second pair does the opposite.

My first question is why is the antiparticle from the first pair colliding with the particle from the second pair any different than colliding with its original partner? Has it just had enough time to become a real particle and therefore emits a photon to conserve energy?

If so, wouldn't the two particles colliding inside the event horizon give off light as well? How is the energy removed from the black hole?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
18,148
10,987
I find this very weird myself. The standard "explanation" I have heard several times on this forum is that it doesn't matter which particle falls in, it automatically has negative energy and thus reduces the mass of the black hole.

More significantly, the whole issue of "virtual particles" as the mechanism for Hawking Radiation is bogus. Hawking said that this "particle pair" thing is JUST an analogy that was the closest he could come to describing in English something that really can only be described in the math.

As to another part of your post, anything that happens inside the event horizon is irrelevant to the rest of the universe and does not cause any loss of mass to the black hole.
 
  • #3
jaydnul
531
15
But what is the physical process. What does a particle with negative energy actually do to the black hole (other than just saying it takes away energy)?
 
  • #4
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
18,148
10,987
But what is the physical process. What does a particle with negative energy actually do to the black hole (other than just saying it takes away energy)?
Taking away energy is equivalent to taking away mass and that is what Hawking Radiation IS ... the removal of mass from a BH.

EDIT: I think I stated that a bit awkwardly. Taking away mass from a BH is the EFFECT of HR, not quite "what it is" as I said originally).
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Hawking Radiation

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
685
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
694
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
816
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
527
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
812
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
957
Top