Heat EQ help

  • #1
1,844
88

Main Question or Discussion Point

hi pf!

i'm wondering if you can help me with the heat eq for a basic cylinder wire problem. namely, we have a wire with radius ##r_i## and length ##L##and resistance is ##R## and current is ##I##. Thus heat produced $$Q = R I^2 \pi r_i^2 L$$. When using the heat eq, we assume time rate of change is negligable. flux is governed by fouriers law, and the divergence theorem gives us the following: $$\int_V k \nabla^2 T dv + \int_V \frac{Q}{\pi r^2 L}dv = 0$$.is this right though? namely, is ##Q## divided by an arbitrary ##r## or the radius ##r_i##?

thanks so much!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bystander
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
5,173
1,173
Last edited:
  • #3
1,844
88
Care to tell us how you came up with this expression?​
I knew units for heat generation in 3-D need to be watts per cubic meter. So I simply tracked units. This Q multiplied by dv gives us watts, which is the unit we're after.
 
  • #4
565
91
But what are the units of [itex]k\nabla^2T[/itex] (k should be the thermal diffusivity)?

[edit: I mean k=thermal conductivity of course]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
1,844
88
But what are the units of [itex]k\nabla^2T[/itex] (k should be the thermal diffusivity)?
Watts per cubic meter, right?
 
  • #6
565
91
and of the term [itex]\frac{Q}{\pi r^2 L} = I^2 R \frac{\pi r_i^2 L}{\pi r^2 L}[/itex] (with [itex]I^2R[/itex] the electric power)?
 
  • #7
1,844
88
and of the term [itex]\frac{Q}{\pi r^2 L} = I^2 R \frac{\pi r_i^2 L}{\pi r^2 L}[/itex] (with [itex]I^2R[/itex] the electric power)?
watts? am i missing something here? seems like you are eluding to something.
 
  • #8
1,844
88
oh shoooot! i should have defined ##Q : Q = I^2 R / \pi r_i ^2 L## right? but is it ##r_i## or ##r##?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
19,919
4,095
oh shoooot! i should have defined ##Q : Q = I^2 R / \pi r_i ^2 L## right? but is it ##r_i## or ##r##?
ri. The rate of heat generation per unit volume in the wire is constant. ri should also be what appears in the equation with the integrals.

Chet
 
  • #10
1,844
88
Hi chet!

ok, so what i should have modeled from the start is $$\int_v k \nabla ^2T dv = \int_v Q dv : Q = I^2 R / \pi r_i^2 L$$ do you all agree? if so, solving would be (using 1-D radial flow in polar coordinates) $$-k\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr} ( r T') = Q \implies \\ -k d(r T') = rQdr \implies \\ \int_?^{??} -k d(r T') = \int_0^{r_i}rQdr$$
but what are my bounds for integration? any ideas?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
19,919
4,095
Q is a constant, so it comes out of the integral. You integrate both sides from 0 to ri.

Chet
 
  • #12
1,844
88
Are you sure? I'm thinking if we had a differential equation over some interval of time ##[0,T]##, say, $$\frac{dy}{dt} = k \implies \\ \int_0^T \frac{dy}{dt} dt = \int_0^T k dt \implies \\ \int_{y(0)}^{y(T)} dy = \int_0^T k dt$$ but notice we do not have ##[0,T]## on both sides.
 
  • #13
19,919
4,095
Are you sure? I'm thinking if we had a differential equation over some interval of time ##[0,T]##, say, $$\frac{dy}{dt} = k \implies \\ \int_0^T \frac{dy}{dt} dt = \int_0^T k dt \implies \\ \int_{y(0)}^{y(T)} dy = \int_0^T k dt$$ but notice we do not have ##[0,T]## on both sides.
OK. 0 to rT' evaluated at ri.

Chet
 
  • #14
1,844
88
OK. 0 to rT' evaluated at ri.

Chet
But in this case we wouldn't have a function of ##r##. Would we instead just integrate from ##0,r## generally so we can still have a profile rather than a number?
 
  • #15
19,919
4,095
But in this case we wouldn't have a function of ##r##. Would we instead just integrate from ##0,r## generally so we can still have a profile rather than a number?
That's fine, but you seemed to be applying the equation over the entire volume. Integrating out to R is just fine.

Chet
 
  • #16
1,844
88
So if I'm understanding this correctly we would have $$-k\int_{0*T'(0)}^{r*T'(r)} d(r T') = Q\int_0^r r dr \implies \\ -k r T'(r) = Qr^2/2 \implies \\ -kT'(r) = Qr/2 \implies \\ -kT'(r) = \frac{R I^2}{2 \pi r_i^2 L r}$$ is this right so far?
 
Last edited:
  • #17
1,844
88
But then if I made a flux balance we could write ##q = R I^2 / (2 \pi r L)## watts/sq. meter. Fourier's law implies also ##q = -k T'(r)## (1-D radial flow). Thus, $$-kT'(r) = \frac{R I^2} { 2 \pi r L}$$ which doesn't agree with the above. Can you help me with what I'm doing wrong?
 
  • #18
19,919
4,095
So if I'm understanding this correctly we would have $$-k\int_{0*T'(0)}^{r*T'(r)} d(r T') = Q\int_0^r r dr \implies \\ -k r T'(r) = Qr^2/2 \implies \\ -kT'(r) = Qr/2 \implies \\ -kT'(r) = \frac{R I^2}{2 \pi r_i^2 L r}$$ is this right so far?
No. Check your algebra.
 
  • #19
1,844
88
No. Check your algebra.
Sorry, we would have $$-kT'(r) = \frac{RI^2 r}{2 \pi r_i^2 L}$$ right? But this still doesn't agree with the flux balance.
 
  • #20
19,919
4,095
Sorry, we would have $$-kT'(r) = \frac{RI^2 r}{2 \pi r_i^2 L}$$ right? But this still doesn't agree with the flux balance.
Who says? Multiply both sides by 2πrL and see what you get.

Chet
 
  • #21
1,844
88
Who says? Multiply both sides by 2πrL and see what you get.

Chet
I must be missing something. The flux balance states ##-kT'(r) = R I^2 / (2 \pi r L)## yet the heat eq method states ##-kT'(r) = R I^2 r / (2 \pi r_i^2 L)##. These two are different. I must have made a mistake but I'm not seeing it.

Thanks so much for your help (and please continue)!
 
  • #22
1,844
88
If the ##r_i^2## was simply ##r^2## then we would have agreeing equations.
 
  • #23
19,919
4,095
I must be missing something. The flux balance states ##-kT'(r) = R I^2 / (2 \pi r L)## yet the heat eq method states ##-kT'(r) = R I^2 r / (2 \pi r_i^2 L)##. These two are different. I must have made a mistake but I'm not seeing it.

Thanks so much for your help (and please continue)!
The first equation is correct only at r = ri. The second equation is correct at all radial locations.
 
  • #24
1,844
88
The first equation is correct only at r = ri. The second equation is correct at all radial locations.
Can you elaborate here. I'm wondering what I have done wrong in the flux balance. It really looked right to me.
 
  • #25
19,919
4,095
Can you elaborate here. I'm wondering what I have done wrong in the flux balance. It really looked right to me.
If the rate of heat generation within the wire is spatially uniform, what fraction of the heat is generated between r = 0 and arbitrary radial position r? What is the rate of heat generation within the wire per unit volume? What is the rate of heat generation between r = 0 and arbitrary radial position r?

Chet
 

Related Threads on Heat EQ help

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
537
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
729
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
768
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top