1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Height of a Ski Ramp

  1. Feb 25, 2008 #1
    [SOLVED] Height of a Ski Ramp

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    You are designing a ski jump ramp for the next Winter Olympics. You need to calculate the vertical height h from the starting gate to the bottom of the ramp. The skiers push off hard with their ski poles at the start, just above the starting gate, so they typically have a speed of 2.0 m/s as they reach the gate. For safety, the skiers should have a speed of no more than 30.0 m/s when they reach the bottom of the ramp. You determine that for a 80.0 kg skier with good form, friction and air resistance will do total work of magnitude 4000 J on him during his run down the slope.

    2. Relevant equations

    v1 = 2m/s
    v2 = 30m/s
    Ugrav1 = mgh
    Ugrav2 = 0
    K1 = 1/2mv1^2
    K2 = 1/2mv2^2
    Wother = 4000J

    K1 + Ugrav1 + Wother = K2 + Ugrav2

    3. The attempt at a solution

    (1/2(80)(2^2)) + (80(9.8))h + 4000J = (1/2(80)(30^2))

    h = ((1/2(80)(30^2))-(1/2(80)(2^2)) - 4000J)/(80(9.8)) = 41m wrong

    not sure what I did wrong, I'm sure I'm using the right equations, any help is appreciated.
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 25, 2008 #2
    K1 + Ugrav1 = K2 + Ugrav2 + Wother
    It should be as I have it.

    Why is this so? Because Wother is lost on the way down, and hence cannot be part of the kinetic and potential energy at the bottom.
  4. Feb 25, 2008 #3
    hmmm, didn't think of that, thanks.

    so using that notation I recieved h = 51m, does that seem right?
  5. Feb 25, 2008 #4
    I dont use calculator for this, you should try it, unless you already do.

    80(2^2)/2 + 80(9.8)h = 80(30^2)/2 + 4000
    2 + 9.8h = 450 + 50
    h = 498/9.8 (now use calculator :D)
    h = 50.82m
    Yes, our answers agree. It seems reasonable to me, if you look at real olympic ski ramps, and take into account the energy lost etc.
  6. Feb 25, 2008 #5
    thanks for the help, amazing how just the position of a variable can affect the whole problem, thanks again.
  7. Feb 25, 2008 #6
    My pleasure. Yes, with energy problems it's particularly tricky, but alas, that is the only way to solve them >D. Thinking about what energy we start with (we didnt start with the 4000J) and what we end with, conservation and all that, usually helps.
  8. Oct 26, 2009 #7
    Re: [SOLVED] Height of a Ski Ramp

    I got a question from what book is this problem . Thanks
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook