- #1

Lamarr

- 52

- 0

I've tried very hard but I cannot find what Heisenberg was working on. My motivation is, there may be some bits of genius among that pile of crackpottery.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Lamarr
- Start date

- #1

Lamarr

- 52

- 0

I've tried very hard but I cannot find what Heisenberg was working on. My motivation is, there may be some bits of genius among that pile of crackpottery.

- #2

- 21,194

- 12,101

W. Heisenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.

http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.269

- #3

Lamarr

- 52

- 0

Well, what's the key problem in his theory?

Also, I'm currently broke, so I can't read the review.

Also, I'm currently broke, so I can't read the review.

- #4

harrylin

- 3,875

- 93

Thanks for the reference!

W. Heisenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 269 (1957)

http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.269

It looks however as if you call a number of people "nobody":

"96 citing articles found:

1.

Nonlinear Spinor Fields and Its Role in Cosmology

Bijan Saha

International Journal of Theoretical Physics , (2012)

2.

Matter-gravity couplings and Lorentz violation

V. Alan Kostelecký and Jay D. Tasson

Phys. Rev. D 83, 016013 (2011)

3.

Four-fermion interaction from torsion as dark energy

Nikodem J. Popławski

General Relativity and Gravitation , (2011)

4.

Reproducing gravity through spinor fields

M. Novello, M. Borba

Gravitation and Cosmology 17, 224 (2011)

5.

Lorentz violation with an antisymmetric tensor

Brett Altschul, Quentin G. Bailey, and V. Alan Kostelecký

Phys. Rev. D 81, 065028 (2010)

6.

Approximate gauge symmetry of composite vector bosons

Mahiko Suzuki

Phys. Rev. D 82, 045026 (2010)

7.

Derivation of Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

Xiang-Yao Wu, Bai-Jun Zhang, Xiao-Jing Liu, Li Xiao, Yi-Heng Wu, Yan Wang, Qing-Cai Wang, Shuang Cheng

International Journal of Theoretical Physics , (2010)

[..]

17.

Constructing Dirac linear fermions in terms of non-linear Heisenberg spinors

M. Novello

EPL (Europhysics Letters) 80, 41001 (2007) "

- #5

ImaLooser

- 489

- 3

Well, what's the key problem in his theory?

Also, I'm currently broke, so I can't read the review.

I have read that H was working with Wolfgang Pauli on something ambitious in their later years. Pauli was quite excited about it. P went to the USA and presented the theory but could not answer the objections. P gave up on it and seems to have been quite embarrassed by the whole thing, as he prided himself on having "never believed in anything that was wrong." P gave up research after that.

Share:

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 444

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 666

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 661

- Last Post

- Replies
- 19

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 658

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 221

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 842

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 853