Effective Techniques for Studying Algebra II/Trig - Tips and Suggestions

In summary: Can you explain what they mean?144 is the value of 144 when expanded to its full form. -144 is the value of -144 when expanded to its full form.
  • #1
lj19
87
0
I'm in Algebra II/Trig. On my first 2 tests, I did not do good. I take notes, study, mostly understand the material, and get extra help sometimes. I want to know if anyone can help by giving me techniques or suggestions on ways to study for this class, in general or specific. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Definitely don't be afraid to ask your teacher questions.

You wrote that you take notes and study, but actually doing the problems, in my opinion, is the only way to get good at math. Practice makes perfect.
 
  • #3
The notes are basically only solving problems.
Are there any other ways to study for algebra?
 
  • #4
Dear lj19,

Confidence (in my humble but confident opinion) is 85%-90% the key to learning any subject. We often hinder ourselves by our self-imposed fears... our lens to reality, so to speak, fraught with bias and negativity that we unwittingly create.

There are various mental techniques one can use to relax oneself and clear these fears. Just know, for starters, that you have a fine mind and obviously a desire to learn. That is a majority of the battle right there.

Also, math is a language. Like any subject or language, mastering it is a building-block process. Don't be ashamed if you haven't mastered certain early steps. Go back to Square 1 if necessary and be certain you've learned that building block... then move forward.

Math is a joy and great fun. It is a combination of deductive and inductive reasoning. We use logic to get from point A to B; we also see answers intuitively and then strive to prove them logically. Both ways are "right."

I think of mathematical equations like a teeter totter. We're looking for balance. Solving for that particular variable is simply a matter of adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, or taking to a particular power BOTH SIDES to ensure the equality is maintained. The ultimate goal is to get our friend (y or some other variable) isolated... all by himself ... so that we can see what he equals. If we have something very simple, such as 3y=x, and we're looking for y, we want to have y stand alone. So we multiply both sides by 1/3, and y is "cleared" (standing alone) and our right side becomes (1/3)x.

Higher branches of mathematics...calculus, differential equations, and more... are no different. As we manipulate the symbols of our mathematical language, we also want to see the beauty and applicability of what we've uncovered.

Sometimes we even expand our language and create new languages for the beauty and reality of what we see. Math is only a language to describe our ever-expanding view of the truth of reality, but what a wonderful language it is.

Best wishes to you. :)
 
  • #5
Not really. The best way to learn algebra is to do a lot of problems. It's a fairly straightforward subject at this level.
 
  • #6
I think it's just a change to do algebra now, because in my school you have to take advanced algebra I, then advanced geometry, then advanced algebra II/trig.
I was just wondering, if anyone knew specific ways to study algebra material.
Are there any online resources to study algebra? The one I know is regentsprep.org but are there any more helpful sites?
Thanks.
 
  • #7
Here's one to make you think... What is γ?

144 x 15.71 + γ x 15.71 = (144 + γ) 14.05
 
  • #8
BTW... γ isn't -144... Just in case you thought you could take the easy way out and multiply everything by 0 (Zero) ;)) Have fun.
 
  • #9
Ch3st3r said:
BTW... γ isn't -144...

why is y not equal to -144?
 
  • #10
Because there is another Answer.

Like I said... if you say Y is -144 it means you end up multiplying both sides with Zero.

There is another answer, you just have to find it. Good Luck.
 
  • #11
Wait you are saying
15.71(144+y)=(144+y)14.05?
wouldnt this mean that that 14.05 must equal 15.71? so how this be solved?
 
  • #12
Ok here's another way of writing it...

2262.24 + y x 15.71 = (144 + y) 14.05
 
  • #13
Ch3st3r said:
Here's one to make you think... What is γ?

144 x 15.71 + γ x 15.71 = (144 + γ) 14.05

Ch3st3r said:
BTW... γ isn't -144... Just in case you thought you could take the easy way out and multiply everything by 0 (Zero) ;)) Have fun.

I don't know what kind of math you're using, but in my world, the answer is -144 and only -144. Unless you want to try pull some mathemagic trick on me.
 
  • #15
I apologise, madah, I made an error... the Equation is : -

144 * 15.71 + y * -6.28 = (144 * y) 14.05

But hey, thanks for showing me wolframalpha.com ... What a fantastic Webb site.

I'll let you work it out now...even with the help of wolframalpha.com ... if you must, lol.

My Apologies again. :( Chester.
 
  • #16
I find it weird that you keep using numbers like 15.71 and why you would ask the question with two given numbers not already multiplied together? 144*15.71? Just type in 2262.24
 
  • #17
144
2262.24-6.28y=2023.2y

2029.2y=2262
y=2262/2029.2=1.115
where is the trick or point lol?
 
  • #19
The Trick or Point (as you put it) was to see if you were able to solve it...

But I've since found out a lot of people on this site either use Excell or Wolframalpha.

Now... Where's the point in that?

Thanks for your Reply, Chester
 
  • #20
lol metallic, the face your making,

pure smugness.
 
  • #21
wait you expect people to use long division to figure out 2262/2029.2? also I used a normal calculator.
 
  • #22
Hi there. Good morning to all. I just saw this thread in my mailbox ... to solve 144 x 15.71 + γ x 15.71 = (144 + γ) 14.05

I like the way the equation makes my eyes cross (especially on a Monday morning, when they're glazed over anyway). x is not a variable but a multiplication symbol. γ resembles y, and it's an argument (on the right side of da equation). That's what makes the equation fun.

But unless I'm missing something, it seems to be pretty simple to solve...

15.71(144 + γ) = 14.05(144 + γ) Thus, y must be -144, for no other solution could render an equality with two disparate coefficients like 15.71 and 14.05 prefacing the same term (144 + γ).

Well, that's a female's take on things, and you know we're all crazy. Best wishes.
 
  • #23
Ch3st3r said:
The Trick or Point (as you put it) was to see if you were able to solve it...
Is that to compare yourself to madah12 since you weren't able to solve it for yourself at first?
But if I remember correctly - since the posts were deleted - you pulled the same move in that thread that I linked to saying that y isn't equal to whatever the one and only answer was. Then you made a typo and corrected it. Seems like dejavu to me.

Ch3st3r said:
But I've since found out a lot of people on this site either use Excell or Wolframalpha.

Now... Where's the point in that?
For confirmation. And in this case it's to have indisputable evidence to reject your false claim.

annoymage said:
lol metallic, the face your making,

pure smugness.
If my face was green and round, it would be an exact replica of my real facial expression.
 
  • #24
I did this problem and y=14.9.
 
  • #25
I don't know.. i did not have a problem solving it, and I am just a regular old algebra student.

Is combining the terms supposed to be the tricky part? once the problem is combined its pretty strait forward, even for me.

The coolest thing about this thread though.. is the link to that website. WOW. i can now check all my answers (like this one) before posting, or better yet, turning in homework.

y=1.14.
 
  • #26
and to the OP, i find algebra best learned at home. I go to the lectures, take notes, then go home and research videos on you tube. Its amazing how many ways you can solve problems, the videos show lots of methods, and i apply the one that best fits my style.

I also tutor other students in the same level math as me, this helps me tremendously by explaining things over and over again.
 
  • #27
To solve it I:
Multiplied 144 and 15.71 to get 2262.24.
The problem was then 2262.24(15.7+y)=(144 +y)(14.05).
Then I distributed 2262.24 to 15.7 and 2262.24 to y which equals 35517.168+2262.24y.
Then I distributed 14.05 to 144 and y which equals 14.05y+2023.2.
Then I subtracted the 2023.2 from both sides.
The problem then was: 33493.968+2262.24y=14.05y.
Then I subtracted 2262.24y from both sides.
Then the problem was 33493.968=14.05y.
Then I divided 33493.968 by 14.05 and y=14.9.
 
  • #28
2262.24+-6.28y=2023.20y
-2023.20y-6.28y=-2262.24
-2029.48y=2262.24
y=1.114

i think you got your distribution wrong.. i did not distribute anything.

lets restate the problem for others to see.

144 * 15.71 + y * -6.28 = (144 * y) 14.05
 
Last edited:
  • #29
lj19 said:
Then I distributed 2262.24 to 15.7 and 2262.24 to y which equals 35517.168+2262.24y.
Then I distributed 14.05 to 144 and y which equals 14.05y+2023.2.

I distributed, because part of the problem is: 2262.24 (1.57 + y), and another part of the problem is: 14.05 (144 + y). Due to the addition sign you cannot combine anything in the parenthesis. So you would have to distribute the outer number being multiplied by the numbers and variables in the parenthesis.
 
  • #30
lj19 said:
I distributed, because part of the problem is: 2262.24 (1.57 + y), and another part of the problem is: 14.05 (144 + y). Due to the addition sign you cannot combine anything in the parenthesis. So you would have to distribute the outer number being multiplied by the numbers and variables in the parenthesis.

there is not addition within the parenthesis, that's multiplication. The left side was solved with order of operations. i could be wrong but that's what i get.
 
  • #31
Ch3st3r said:
Here's one to make you think... What is γ?

144 x 15.71 + γ x 15.71 = (144 + γ) 14.05

Allenspark said:
2262.24+-6.28y=2023.20y
-2023.20y-6.28y=-2262.24
-2029.48y=2262.24
y=1.114

i think you got your distribution wrong.. i did not distribute anything.

lets restate the problem for others to see.

144 * 15.71 + y * -6.28 = (144 * y) 14.05

Which problem is the correct original problem?
(144)(15.71)(15.71 + y) = (14.05)(144 + y) or (144)(-6.28)(15.71 + y) = (14.05)(144)(y)?
 
  • #32
lj19 said:
Which problem is the correct original problem?
(144)(15.71)(15.71 + y) = (14.05)(144 + y) or (144)(-6.28)(15.71 + y) = (14.05)(144)(y)?

he changed it to this towards the bottom of the first page.
144 * 15.71 + y * -6.28 = (144 * y) 14.05

the original problem had a solution of -144.
 
  • #33
I read this thread, I must've forgotten. After multiplying 144(-6.28)=904.32, the left side of the problem would be (904.32)(15.71 + y), so wouldn't you distribute the 904.32 to 15.71 and to y.
 
  • #34
lj19 said:
I read this thread, I must've forgotten. After multiplying 144(-6.28)=904.32, the left side of the problem would be (904.32)(15.71 + y), so wouldn't you distribute the 904.32 to 15.71 and to y.

Allenspark said:
he changed it to this towards the bottom of the first page.
144 * 15.71 + y * -6.28 = (144 * y) 14.05

the original problem had a solution of -144.

the left side is (144*15.71)+(y*-6.28)
The right side is (144*y*14.05)
 
  • #35
For the left side, wouldn't you multiply -6.28 by 144? Then those equal 904.32.
 

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
790
Replies
4
Views
922
Replies
7
Views
860
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
690
Back
Top