Hi!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have an argument and I have to prove the validity of all possible ways.

I have proved by logical implication, tautology, contradiction and contrapositive, butthe problem is reduced to prove the hypothesis by logical equivalences and implications.

The reasoning is as follows:

[P->(L->M)]^L^M -> ¬P

I've tried to do the following:

[P-> (L-> M)] ^ L ^ M

<=> [(P ^ L) -> M] ^ L ^ M {Export}

<=> (¬ ¬ P v L v M) ^ L ^ M {Involvement and Morgan}

From here not continue, and I've tried other ways and always came to the same and not continue.

Could anyone help me out?

Thanks! ;)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Help with discrete Mathematics

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**