Help with Gauss's Law please

  • #1
51
1

Homework Statement


A charge of -30 μC is distributed uniformly throughout a spherical volume of radius 10.0 cm. Determine the electric field due to this charge at a distance of (a) 2.0 cm, (b) 5.0 cm, and (c) 20.0 cm from the center of the sphere.

Homework Equations


Eq. (1): E⋅A=qenc
Eq. (2): qenc=q⋅(r/R)3

In qenc, r is the radius of my Gaussian surface and R is the radius of the actual sphere, 10.0 cm.

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) E= -5.8E8 N/C

(b) E= -1.35E7 N/C

(c) This is where I'm a bit stuck. If I let the radius of my Gaussian surface be 20.0 cm, then all of the actual sphere will be enclosed in my surface. Therefore, qenc would be -30 μC. However, if I use Eq. (2), I get that qenc is -2.4E-6 C which wouldn't really make any sense. Why would there be more charge than what's given? Using what I feel is the more rational option (i.e. letting qenc be -30 μC, I get the following answer:
E= -6.7E6 N/C

If I'd used Eq. (2) to find qenc, I would've gotten E= -5.4E7 N/C. This doesn't make any sense to me, since E is proportional to the inverse radius squared.

I have no way to see if this problem is correct, as it comes from a textbook that only shows answers to odd problems and this is an even problem. Thank for any help in advance!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
45,089
1,396
If I let the radius of my Gaussian surface be 20.0 cm, then all of the actual sphere will be enclosed in my surface. Therefore, qenc would be -30 μC.
That would be correct.

However, if I use Eq. (2),
Your Eq (2) is only valid within the volume that contains the charge. (For r <= R, the radius of the charged sphere.)
 
  • #3
51
1
Thanks! I just to make sure I'm understanding this topic correctly. Anytime we have a uniform charge distribution, we can imaginarily encompass some or all of that charge distribution in a Gaussian shape and subsequently use Gauss's law to find the electric field at some point relative to the charge distribution? Is it really that simple, or am I just over-simplifying it? Also, if the charge distribution is not uniform (I think this would mean the E-field varies) we have to integrate φ=∫E(x,y)⋅cosθ⋅dA?
 
  • #4
Doc Al
Mentor
45,089
1,396
Anytime we have a uniform charge distribution, we can imaginarily encompass some or all of that charge distribution in a Gaussian shape and subsequently use Gauss's law to find the electric field at some point relative to the charge distribution? Is it really that simple, or am I just over-simplifying it?
Yes, it really is that simple. Assuming you have the needed symmetry. If you do not have the symmetry, applying Gauss' law might involve integrations that you won't be able to simply calculate.
 
  • #5
51
1
Got it. Thanks again!
 

Related Threads on Help with Gauss's Law please

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top