- #1

- 215

- 0

But the line integral is also

So, given scalar function f and taking the gradient vector of it in order to turn it into a vector field F. Why is equation1 not equal to equation2?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter cshum00
- Start date

- #1

- 215

- 0

But the line integral is also

So, given scalar function f and taking the gradient vector of it in order to turn it into a vector field F. Why is equation1 not equal to equation2?

- #2

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,847

- 969

- #3

- 215

- 0

[itex]\int_a^b f(r(t)) |r'(t)|dt \neq \int_a^b F(r(t)) \cdot r'(t)dt[/itex]

Why?

- #4

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,847

- 969

Why

[itex]\int_a^b f(r(t)) |r'(t)|dt \neq \int_a^b F(r(t)) \cdot r'(t)dt[/itex]

Why?

- #5

- 215

- 0

Let [itex]f(x,y) = xy[/itex]

[itex]F=\nabla f(x,y)=<y,x>[/itex]

Curve C => [itex]y=x, 0<x<1[/itex]

Parametrize [itex]r(t)=<t,t>, 0<t<1[/itex]

[itex]r'(t)=<1,1>[/itex]

[itex]|r'(t)|=\sqrt2[/itex]

[itex]f(r(t))=t^2[/itex]

[itex]F(r(t))=<t,t>[/itex]

If [itex]\int_a^b f(r(t))|r'(t)|dt = \int_a^b F(r(t)) \cdot r'(t)dt[/itex]

[itex]\int_0^1 t^2 \sqrt2dt = \int_0^1 <t,t> \cdot <1,1>dt[/itex]

[itex](\sqrt2/3) t^3 |_0^1 = \int_0^1 2t dt[/itex]

[itex]\sqrt2/3 = t^2 |_0^1[/itex]

[itex]\sqrt2/3 \neq 1[/itex]

- #6

- 215

- 0

[itex]\int_a^b f(r(t)) |r'(t)|dt \neq \int_a^b \nabla f(r(t)) \cdot r'(t)dt[/itex]

is because the formula given on the book say that they should be equal. However, as i try many examples; i never get the same answer. Here is some general proof i have been trying but never got far.

Let [itex]f(x,y)=f(x,y)[/itex]

[itex]F = \nabla f(x,y)=<f_x, f_y>[/itex]

Let Parametrization of Curve C:

[itex]r(t) = <g(t), h(t)>[/itex]

[itex]r'(t) = <g'(t), h'(t)>[/itex]

[itex]|r'(t)| = [g'(t)^2 + h'^2(t)]^\frac{1}{2}[/itex]

[itex]\int_a^b f(r(t)) |r'(t)|dt = \int_a^b \nabla f(r(t)) \cdot r'(t)dt[/itex]

[itex]\int_a^b f(g(t), h(t))[g'(t)^2 + h'(t)^2]^\frac{1}{2}dt = \int_a^b <f(_x, f_y> \cdot <g'(t), h'(t)>dt[/itex]

[itex]\int_a^b f(g(t), h(t))[g'(t)^2 + h'(t)^2]^\frac{1}{2}dt = \int_a^b g'(t)f_x(g(t), h(t))+ h'(t)f_y(g(t), h(t))dt[/itex]

Since limits and variable of integration are the same then

[itex]f(g(t), h(t))[g'(t)^2 + h'(t)^2]^\frac{1}{2} = g'(t)f_x(g(t), h(t)) + h'(t)f_y(g(t), h(t))[/itex]

But since i don't have any idea of what is going on inside those partial derivatives, i don't have a clue how to proceed.

Edit: In addition, the right hand side kind of looks like the product rule of a derivative.

Share: