1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Helpe me

  1. Jun 2, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    three quistions':
    1) What is a meaning of (homotopic) in Cauchy's theorem for the sets'?
    and in sets what is t,s where H(t,s)

    (-1)^1/2*(-1)^1/2 = (-1*-1)^1/2=1^1/2=1=/=i^2

    In Integral functions' by Reiman Sum
    is delta x
    It handles any inclination at the point
    Concluded that by diminishing its value to zero

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    2) (-1)^1/2*(-1)^1/2 = i(1)^1/2*i(1)^1/2=i*i=-1=/=1
    But the former right way
    The result is wrong
    logic Sports saysThe right does not lead to an error
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 2, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Two paths in a topological space (or the functions defining those paths) are said to be "homotopic" if one can be "continuously deformed" into the other. More specifically, if f:R-> X is a function from the real numbers to a space X (so that f defines a one-dimensional path in X) and g:R->X is another, then f and g are homotopic if and only if there exist a function [itex]\Phi(t, u)[/itex] where [itex]0\le t\le 1[/itex], u is real number, continuous in both t and u, and such that [itex]\Phi(0, u)= f(u)[/itex], [itex]\Phi(1, u)= g(u)[/itex].

    I don't recognize this. What is H? What area of "sets" do you mean? Since you mention "homotopic" could this be a homotopy group?

    No, axbx= (ab)x does not, in general, hold for complex numbers.

    "Inclination"? I think that's a mis-translation. delta x measures the slight change in x on which you are basing your Riemann Sum.

    It's a bit more complicated than that. You must let delta x go to 0 while, at the same time letting the number of terms in the sum go to infinity. In any case, I see no question here.

    "logic" doesn't work if you start from incorrect premises. As I said above, axbx is not generally true for complex numbers. It is the "former" that is wrong. The definition of "1/2 power" or square root, is that (a1/2)(a1/2)= (a1/2)2= a for any complex number a. (-1)1/2(-1)1/2= -1 is correct.
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 2, 2008
  4. Jun 2, 2008 #3
    Thanks you the abundant thanks
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook