Hermitian operators

  • Thread starter holden
  • Start date
  • #1
30
0
asking here because i originally asked in the wrong place :)

this question is two parts, both dealing with telling if combinations of hermitian operators are hermitian.

the first combination is PX + XP, where P stands for the momentum operator, (h bar /i)(d/x), and X is the "x operator", x. i have figured out that PX and XP are not hermitian by themselves, but i don't have any idea how to go about showing their linear combination is or isn't. so far i have tried calculating the expectation values for PX + XP and it's conjugate to see if they were the same, but i get the feeling this isn't a correct method.

the second combination is XPX.. i know if you have two operators multiplied, their product can only be hermitian if their commutator is zero.. but how do you do a commutator of a product of three operators?

any help is greatly appreciated! thanks so much.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
78
1
You should take a dagger to this new operator and show it is equal to the operator itself, example:

* means dagger!
(PX+XP)* = (PX)* + (XP)* = X*P* + P*X* ={X*=X}= XP + PX = (PX + XP)
 
  • #3
30
0
oo thanks :)
 
  • #4
30
0
think i got it - but how about the XPX combination? can you do the same technique of moving from the bra to the ket and vice versa, since the individual operators are hermitian?
 
  • #5
78
1
As you know (AB)* = B*A*, so the same reversal of the order will apply to three operators so (XPX)*=X*P*X*=XPX.
If you want a more rigorous proof:
(ABC)*=C*(AB)*=C*(B*A*)=C*B*A*
 
  • #6
30
0
cool, that's what i was thinking too. thanks so much again.
 
  • #7
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,103
651
Ahmes said:
You should take a dagger to this new operator and show it is equal to the operator itself, example:

* means dagger!
(PX+XP)* = (PX)* + (XP)* = X*P* + P*X* ={X*=X}= XP + PX = (PX + XP)

This is nonsense, since the X & P operators are unbounded on [itex] \mathcal{H}=L^{2}(\mathbb{R}) [/itex].

A proof for the symmetry of the [itex] XP+PX [/itex] operator is quite difficult.

Daniel.
 
  • #8
78
1
Can you allaborate?
From what I know this was enough, proofs like this were shown to us in class.
What did you mean by unbounded?
 
  • #9
George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,455
1,114
Ahmes said:
What did you mean by unbounded?

An linear operator A on a Hilbert is unbounded if for any positive real number c, there exists a Hilbert space element psi such that the Hilbert space element (A psi) is at least as large as the length of psi muliplied by c.

It turns out that for any state space, at least one of the operators X and P must be unbounded.

This type of stuff often is not mentioned in North American quantum theory courses because often it does not cause problems. Occasionally, however, it can lead one astray - see https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=122063" that I started.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
78
1
Thanks! This thread looks very interesting. I'll read it all when I have time.
 

Related Threads on Hermitian operators

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
657
Top