Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Higgs field

  1. Feb 27, 2008 #1
    didn't know where to post this. Was wondering earlier why objects have mass so i googled it.. i'm in grade 12 so don't really understand EVERYTHING you know lol.

    but anyways found out about higgs field and higgs boson. Can someone explain how this explains why things have 'mass' like why do particles cling to it (the higgs boson) and how does this cause drag to create the mass.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2008 #2
  4. Feb 28, 2008 #3

    malawi_glenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    also, Higgs only explains the mass of the W and Z bosons. See the sub-forum "High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics", there are many threads about LHC and Higgs mechanism etc.
     
  5. Feb 28, 2008 #4
    I understand it this way: Three components of the Higgs field create Electroweak Symmetry breaking and the quanta of the fourth component, the Higgs Boson gives, mass to all other fermions.
     
  6. Feb 28, 2008 #5
    ohhh got you kind of makes more sense :D thks guys. i'll check out that article as well :D
     
  7. Feb 29, 2008 #6

    malawi_glenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I have never herd anyone else saying this...
    reference?
     
  8. Feb 29, 2008 #7
    I would rather say the opposite. During EW symmetry breaking, 3 components of the Higgs doublet (the goldstone bosons) are eaten by W and B fields resulting in massive W and Z.

    Yes, the vacuum expectation value (vev) through yukawa terms added by hand gives mass to fermions.
    So on one side these terms are added by hand.
    On the other side, we cannot easily add terms like m_i e_L e_R without breaking gauge invariance.
     
  9. Mar 1, 2008 #8
    Below is an extract from a (very) basic summary I put together some time ago regarding fermions and bosons and the Higgs mechanism-

    Fermions and bosons

    Informally speaking, fermions are 'stiff' and are considered to be particles of matter while bosons are considered to be carriers of the fundamental forces. Bosons have integer spin while fermions have half-integer spin. Bosons can share quantum states while fermions are constrained by the Pauli exclusion principle* and cannot.

    - Fermions
    As an observer circles a fermion, the wave function changes, hence the term half-integer spin (1/2, 3/2, 5/2). Fermions have an antisymmetric wavefunction and show destructive interference of identical single particle wavefunctions, hence the inability to share quantum states.
    Fermions fall into 2 types, quarks (that make up protons, neutrons) and leptons (electrons, muons).

    - Bosons
    As an observer circles a boson, the wave function doesn't change, hence the term integer spin (0,1,2). Bosons have a symmetric wavefunction and show constructive interference of identical particle wavefunctions, hence the ability to share quantum states.
    Bosons fall into 2 categories-
    - gauge (or vector) bosons- which are considered elementary particles, carriers of the fundamental forces- photons (electromagnetism), W and Z bosons (weak force) and gluons (strong force).
    - composite particle bosons- which include He-4 atoms (Helium with 2 protons, 2 neutrons, 2 electrons), sodium-23 atoms (11 protons, 12 neutrons, 11 electrons) and the nucleus of deuterium (1 proton, 1 neutron). These are made up of an even number of fermions (composites with an even number of fermions become bosons, while composites with an odd number of fermions remain as fermions).


    There is also the Higgs boson (yet to be detected), which make up the quanta of the Higgs field. The Higgs field supposedly permeates all of space with an ocean-like ether, which has 'grain' (like that of wood) that interacts with all other particles in 3 ways (2 types for bosons, 1 type for fermions)
    - photon bosons travel with the grain and are therefore light and long range.
    - W & Z bosons travel 'against' the grain and are heavy and short range.
    - fermions travel 'through' the grain (such as electrons and quarks which 'tumble' through the Higgs field, making them appear as matter).
    The idea of grain should not be thought of as a direction in 3-dimensional space but as an abstract internal space occupied by vector bosons, quarks and electrons.


    * Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical particles in a system, such as electrons or quarks can possess an identical set of quantum numbers.


    Steve
     
  10. Mar 4, 2008 #9
    I'll follow up with a seemingly dumb question here:
    If the Higgs boson is the quanta for the Higgs field, and the Higgs Boson can't go faster than light, then why is a black hole even possible ?
    Shouldn't the Higgs boson follow the same rules as other bosons and end up 'locked' inside the black hole ?
     
  11. Mar 4, 2008 #10
  12. Mar 6, 2008 #11
    For anyone interested, below is a link to a video of Peter Higgs talking about the Higgs mechanism-



    Steve
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 25, 2014
  13. Mar 7, 2008 #12
    Well, still no answer on my question. Doesn't anyone see a paradox here ?
    So the higgs is a particle when it's outside the black hole so it can give mass to stuff around the black hole but somehow inside, it's no longer a particle, because that's not convenient.
    I'm no genius but this seems ambiguous.
     
  14. Mar 7, 2008 #13
    Do you agree that from the point of view of general relativity, there is no real paradox of "how does gravity escape a black hole ?" ?

    So you are asking a question relevant in the context of quantum mechanics really. Two things :
    • If you are talking about "normal mass", the Higgs is almost irrelevant. Normal mass, yours and the one of objects around you is not explained by the Higgs anyway.
    • If more generally you are concerned about how anything can escape a black hole, information and in particular the photons letting you know there is charge inside and/or the gravitons letting you know there is mass and (possibly) angular momentum, or even the Hawking radiation simply, leading eventually to the complete evaporation of the black hole, no fully satisfactory answer is available as of today, since we don't know what quantum gravity is.

    But we can provide you with some answers, especially you can read Beaz's stuff on virtual particles, where you can find answers to such questions as "do virtual particles travel faster than light ?" or "do they contradict relativity or causality".
     
  15. Mar 7, 2008 #14
    If I understand your question correctly: Higgs particles 'give' other particles mass. They don't []transmit[/i] gravitational force. It's a fallacy to assume that the two have to be the same thing. One assumes that the interaction between mass terms is quite seperate from the process that they originate from.
     
  16. Mar 7, 2008 #15
    Once again : the Higgs boson is irrelevant to explain 99.99% of the mass we are talking about here. Normal mass around you does not come from the Higgs boson.

    If you want to talk about dark matter or something like that, please state it explicitely.
     
  17. Mar 7, 2008 #16
    BTW I did not pay enough attention to that. If someone tells you things about what is happening inside a black hole, you might as well tell him this is not science. Nobody knows what is happening behind the horizon. The horizon itself is not very special, and we don't expect that physics changes when we cross it, but we can't know.

    So if I'm telling you that behind the horizon, the mass of particles is not explained by the Higgs boson or by the glue field, by nothing except little green Witten dwarfs, you can't prove me wrong.
     
  18. Mar 7, 2008 #17
  19. Mar 7, 2008 #18

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    These things aren't the same?

    :confused:
     
  20. Mar 8, 2008 #19
    Alright, I'm just going to hijack this thread to ask my question about the Higgs. I know it is due to a degenerate vacuum basically U|0> does not equal |0>. Could someone clearly explain multiple or degenerate vacuum states. Also, kind of related or maybe not, I was listening to a talk by Wald on QFT in curved spacetime and he said there is no way to define a unique vacuum even in the free particle case. He said this was due to a lack of time translation symmetry, so you couldn't construct a Fock space. Could someone elaborate on this and more generally on why can't construct a Fock space even for non interacting quantum gravity.
     
  21. Mar 9, 2008 #20

    Pythagorean

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    you and the paper you referenced both do this to me:
    you and the author seem to stop just short of denying that the Higgs Field has anything to do with our experiential mass. I've nearly completed undergraduate studies in physics and I don't think I'll see particle physics (beyond Griffith's QM) until grad school, so without further ado... specific questions:

    1) Are these two (gravity and gravity) completely different mechanisms that just happen to share the same name?
    2) Are these the same mechanism but in a different situation (i.e. different particles, same 'operator')?

    and a possibly off-topic question

    3) is what we experience as inertia described in particle physics at all?
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2008
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Higgs field
  1. Higgs field (Replies: 9)

  2. Higgs field (Replies: 7)

  3. Higgs Field (Replies: 19)

  4. The higgs field? (Replies: 20)

  5. Higgs Field (Replies: 12)

Loading...