- #1

- 330

- 6

- A
- Thread starter mertcan
- Start date

- #1

- 330

- 6

- #2

Cryo

Gold Member

- 173

- 73

What is the frequency range? What is application?

Have a look at theory of guided waves, transmission line theory, waveguides etc. IMHO. There are a lot of approximations and useful techniques developed for this field.

- #3

- 330

- 6

Thanks for return, when I endeavor to dig information out of Internet I can not find valuable things could you share me nice sources book files or videos?

What is the frequency range? What is application?

Have a look at theory of guided waves, transmission line theory, waveguides etc. IMHO. There are a lot of approximations and useful techniques developed for this field.

- #4

- 330

- 6

Besides, I have seen that transmission line theory applies kirchoff laws altough at high frequencies kirchoff laws can not be applied. Could you explain this contradiction??

What is the frequency range? What is application?

Have a look at theory of guided waves, transmission line theory, waveguides etc. IMHO. There are a lot of approximations and useful techniques developed for this field.

- #5

Cryo

Gold Member

- 173

- 73

Not quite sure what you mean here. Do you mean that the common way to derive the telegraf equation is to introduce distributed inductance/capacitatne/resistance and then talk about a small section of the transmission line as if we were dealing with low-frequency circuits? Well this bit makes perfect sense. They start with a transmission line which is small in one direction (thickness), but large in the other (length-wise). The size here is relative to wavelength of the radiation. Then they isolate a small section of the transmission line, which is now small in both directions, so the low-freqency Kirchhoff's laws apply. Finally they link these small bits together and take a continuum limit. If you want to discuss this point (telegraf equation) you need to be more specific, i.e. give the derivation and ask about specific parts you don't like.Besides, I have seen that transmission line theory applies kirchoff laws altough at high frequencies kirchoff laws can not be applied. Could you explain this contradiction??

- #6

Cryo

Gold Member

- 173

- 73

I don't work with guided waves myself. Most of my work is with propagating free-space waves, but I can suggest Pozar's "Microwave Engineering". Maybe experts around here will give better suggestions.Thanks for return, when I endeavor to dig information out of Internet I can not find valuable things could you share me nice sources book files or videos?

- #7

- #8

tech99

Gold Member

- 1,916

- 684

If you imagine a network consisting of just one resistor at the end of long wires, at high frequencies the distributed L and C along the wires causes the wires to act as transmission lines. The resistance is then transformed to a totally different impedance at the opposite end of the wires. For this reason,@Cryo hi again I just would like to express I can not establish any connection between size of device being comparable to wavelength and kirchoff law conservation. Could you help me understand better?

- #9

- 16,022

- 7,327

- #10

- 330

- 6

Thanks for your your return, My first question is : is there a proof when size of device on circuit gets smaller than wavelength, then kirchoff law is much more true??If you imagine a network consisting of just one resistor at the end of long wires, at high frequencies the distributed L and C along the wires causes the wires to act as transmission lines. The resistance is then transformed to a totally different impedance at the opposite end of the wires. For this reason,complexnetworks which are physically large are a problem at high frequencies. I have not had to tackle a network of this sort before, but I think an RF bridge would be an example where Kirchoff might be necessary. For the most part, networks are ladder or tee types, where Kirchoff is not necessary.

also I would like to say that I can not find nice examples and solution pertain to high frequency circuits on internet. Lots of stupid videos exist on youtube . Would you mind suggesting a book or pdf files or nice lecture notes or videos related to that topic in order to learn more effectively?

- #11

- 16,022

- 7,327

The standard textbook is of course Jackson, Classical electrodynamics.

- #12

- 330

- 6

Thanks @vanhees71 by the way is there mathematical proof when size of device on circuit gets smaller than wavelength, then kirchoff law is much more true? ?The standard textbook is of course Jackson, Classical electrodynamics.

- #13

- 16,022

- 7,327

- #14

tech99

Gold Member

- 1,916

- 684

Does it mean that I am slightly in error if I calculate the input impedance of a line, which is in free space, using ordinary transmission line theory? For example, using Zo and Zload?

- #15

- 330

- 6

@vanhees71 I have already the book but I can not find the proof that when size of device on circuit gets smaller than wavelength, then kirchoff law is much more true??

- #16

Cryo

Gold Member

- 173

- 73

The current law simply states that current is incompressible (what goes into the node, must come out). In electrodynamics you would instead say that the integral of the current density over any closed surface must be zero (in simple terms current density*area = current )

Then, using Gauss' law on current density ##\boldsymbol{J}##:

##\oint d^2r \boldsymbol{J}.\boldsymbol{\hat{n}}=\int d^3 r \boldsymbol{\nabla.J}##

So the Kirchhoff's Current Law requires the divergence of current density to vanish. Take the divergence of the fourth Maxwell's law:

##\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{B}=0=\mu_0\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{J}+\frac{n^2}{c^2}\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\dot{E}}##

So to get the Kirchhoff' Current Law you need ##\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\dot{E}} \to 0 ##

The Kirchoff's voltage law states, that voltages around a closed loop add up to zero. Voltage between points ##a## and ##b## is given by: ##V=\int^{b}_{a} \boldsymbol{E}.d\boldsymbol{r}##. So KVL is basically, ##\oint \vec{E}.d\boldsymbol{r}=0##. From Maxwell's third law ##\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{E}=-\boldsymbol{\dot{B}}##, so to get KVL you need

##\boldsymbol{\dot{B}}\to 0##.

At this point you have to start hand-waveing. For example, you could say that both conditions are satisfied if the time-scale of your oscillations is long (time-derivatives vanish). But what does long mean? Wave-equations couple space and time, so long time-scales are equivalent to short distances. The conversion factor is the speed of light. Have a look at microwave engineering books for more details. Did you check Pozar?

- #17

- 4,675

- 2,026

Dr. Walter Lewin makes an addition to the Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL)=see e.g. https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/a-new-interpretation-of-dr-walter-lewins-paradox/ so that the requirement that ## \frac{dB}{dt}=0 ## is not necessary. ## \\ ## However, the assumption in KVL that the current is the same everywhere in the circuit requires that wavelengths involved are large compared to the size of the circuit. Kirchhoff's voltage law does not allow for a current of the form ## i(x,t)=i_o \cos(kx-\omega t) ## that is different for different locations ## x ## in the circuit. With Kirchhoff, we can have ## i=i_o \cos(\omega t) ## , but that current is the same everywhere in the circuit, i.e. we can have a branch, etc, but what goes into the junction comes out of the junction, etc.## \\ ## See also post 52 of https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...asure-a-voltage-across-inductor.880100/page-3 for Dr. Walter Lewin's video. IMO, Dr. Walter Lewin makes an important addition to the KVL theory with the paradox that he presents for the case where ## \frac{dB}{dt} \neq 0 ##. (It would be helpful to watch this video before reading the more in-depth discussion of it in the "link" of the first paragraph). ## \\ ## Edit: Additional item: With KVL, there is no provision for a circuit to be able to radiate power. When power is radiated, KVL will not compute the power correctly. If there is significant power radiated, the results that KVL gets must thereby be an approximation. @vanhees71 Please confirm these last statements, but I believe they are correct.

Last edited:

- #18

- 330

- 6

Yes I have checked Pozar but could not see any clue or derivation of the relation between wavelength size and kirchoff laws? Could you help me a little bit more to understand it better?

The current law simply states that current is incompressible (what goes into the node, must come out). In electrodynamics you would instead say that the integral of the current density over any closed surface must be zero (in simple terms current density*area = current )

Then, using Gauss' law on current density ##\boldsymbol{J}##:

##\oint d^2r \boldsymbol{J}.\boldsymbol{\hat{n}}=\int d^3 r \boldsymbol{\nabla.J}##

So the Kirchhoff's Current Law requires the divergence of current density to vanish. Take the divergence of the fourth Maxwell's law:

##\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{B}=0=\mu_0\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{J}+\frac{n^2}{c^2}\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\dot{E}}##

So to get the Kirchhoff' Current Law you need ##\boldsymbol{\nabla}.\boldsymbol{\dot{E}} \to 0 ##

The Kirchoff's voltage law states, that voltages around a closed loop add up to zero. Voltage between points ##a## and ##b## is given by: ##V=\int^{b}_{a} \boldsymbol{E}.d\boldsymbol{r}##. So KVL is basically, ##\oint \vec{E}.d\boldsymbol{r}=0##. From Maxwell's third law ##\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{E}=-\boldsymbol{\dot{B}}##, so to get KVL you need

##\boldsymbol{\dot{B}}\to 0##.

At this point you have to start hand-waveing. For example, you could say that both conditions are satisfied if the time-scale of your oscillations is long (time-derivatives vanish). But what does long mean? Wave-equations couple space and time, so long time-scales are equivalent to short distances. The conversion factor is the speed of light. Have a look at microwave engineering books for more details. Did you check Pozar?

Last edited:

- #19

- 330

- 6

As far as I see Walter Lewin does not link wavelength up with kirchoff conservation laws. It is always written that wavelength size affects kirchoff laws conservation. When it comes to find some mathematical proof if it, I can not find valuable things. I do not want to memorize those things just verbally, also I would like to examine the mathematical derivation of the relation between wavelength size and kirchoff conservation laws. Could you help me in that regard?Dr. Walter Lewin makes an addition to the Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL)=see e.g. https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/a-new-interpretation-of-dr-walter-lewins-paradox/ so that the requirement that ## \frac{dB}{dt}=0 ## is not necessary. ## \\ ## However, the assumption in KVL that the current is the same everywhere in the circuit requires that wavelengths involved are large compared to the size of the circuit. Kirchhoff's voltage law does not allow for a current of the form ## i(x,t)=i_o \cos(kx-\omega t) ## that is different for different locations ## x ## in the circuit. With Kirchhoff, we can have ## i=i_o \cos(\omega t) ## , but that current is the same everywhere in the circuit, i.e. we can have a branch, etc, but what goes into the junction comes out of the junction, etc.## \\ ## See also post 52 of https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...asure-a-voltage-across-inductor.880100/page-3 for Dr. Walter Lewin's video. IMO, Dr. Walter Lewin makes an important addition to the KVL theory with the paradox that he presents for the case where ## \frac{dB}{dt} \neq 0 ##. (It would be helpful to watch this video before reading the more in-depth discussion of it in the "link" of the first paragraph). ## \\ ## Edit: Additional item: With KVL, there is no provision for a circuit to be able to radiate power. When power is radiated, KVL will not compute the power correctly. If there is significant power radiated, the results that KVL gets must thereby be an approximation. @vanhees71 Please confirm these last statements, but I believe they are correct.

- #20

- 16,022

- 7,327

https://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/theo2-l3.pdf

- #21

- 330

- 6

Thanks for sharing actually I have a little bit german but English would be so nice so could you tell me on which page I should focus for my question?

https://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/theo2-l3.pdf

- #22

jasonRF

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,349

- 407

First, i hope you have looked at transmission line theory enough so that you have seen the equation after the title "input impedance of lossless transmission line" atMy first question is : is there a proof when size of device on circuit gets smaller than wavelength, then kirchoff law is much more true??

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_line

This of course aasumes ##\exp(j \omega t )## time dependence.

Consider the simple case where you have a transmission line of length ##\ell## and characteristic impedance ##Z_0## that is shorted on one end. Of course the low frequency approximation (Kirchoff law) tells us that the impedance looking into the other end will be zero. However, transmission line theory tells us the impedance looking into the other end will be

$$Z_{in}=j Z_0 \tan(2 \pi \ell / \lambda) $$

where ##\lambda## is the wavelength of a signal on the line. ##Z_{in}## is clearly not zero. However, when ##2 \pi \ell << \lambda## then we have

$$Z_{in}\approx j Z_0 2 \pi \ell / \lambda $$

This clearly approaches the Kirchoff law approximation of zero as ## \ell/\lambda \rightarrow 0##.

While this is not a completely general proof it shows you the basic idea. Hope that helps.

Jason

- #23

- 16,022

- 7,327

It's the beginning of Chpt. 4 (p. 103).Thanks for sharing actually I have a little bit german but English would be so nice so could you tell me on which page I should focus for my question?