I'm trying to understand the Hill Sphere formula. (Yes, I've already been to Wikipedia.)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I notice that it doesn't take the mass of the satellite into consideration. Is that because the mass of the satellite has no effect, or is it a simplification based on the assumption that the mass of the satellite is very small with respect to the masses of the other two bodies? How would it apply to twin planets?

I found https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1225193&postcount=10" which seems to indicate satellite mass does matter. If so, how should the formula be altered to include the effect of a large satellite?

Also, what about the relative masses of the other two bodies? Ismassumed to be a very small fraction ofM? If, for example, you were looking at a planet orbiting one star of a binary system, would the formula need to be altered in any way?

(I'm looking for a way to calculatereasonableouter limits for stable orbits in a variety of hypothetical situations. I don't need a high degree of accuracy. For example, although it would be nice to include eccentricity, the cases I'm interested in are sufficiently near to circular for that to be a reasonable approximation.)

Thank you for your assistance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Hill Sphere Question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Hill Sphere Question | Date |
---|---|

Orbiting the Sun beyond the Hill sphere | Feb 18, 2013 |

Is this point at Hill sphere? | Jan 19, 2011 |

Hill Sphere Explanation | Aug 30, 2010 |

Hill Sphere Derivation? | Nov 12, 2007 |

Space Station going down hill? | Oct 25, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**