History of chemistry/physic

  • Thread starter lewis198
  • Start date
  • #1
96
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

hey guys, I was thinking about the history of chemistry/physics and thought:

Ok, we know from experimentation that there is matter that cannot be easily reduced, i.e. elements.

However the way we are taught about (in)organic chemistry at school assumes that the structure is a given. How does one tell the structure of a compound, without actually looking at it? Ok, salt would be easy, and metals, but what process would take place?

Does AFM, STM and other forms of microscopy hold promise of 'seeing' actual structures? Because it seems that many structures are just theory and can be falsified.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
96
0
for example the structure of DNA was not actually 'seen', it was just a model based on the experiments and theory of other physicists.
 
  • #3
980
2
What's seeing if not just bouncing photons off and back-inferring from the scattering pattern? Replace photons with electrons... or with neutrons... and you do the back-inferring on a computer... what's the difference?
 

Related Threads on History of chemistry/physic

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
837
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
22K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
90
Views
14K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top