1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Support PF! Reminder for those going back to school to buy their text books via PF Here!
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Topology How are Kelley, Dugundji, and Willard compared to Munkres?

  1. Feb 29, 2016 #1
    Dear all,

    I recently found the topology textbooks written by Kelley, Dugundji, and Willard, which I heard that they are more concise and motivational than Munkres, which is a required text for my current topology course. I actually do not like Munkres as he is very verbose, and his problems are not insightful and challenging either. Unfortunately, there is no way for me to read Kelley, Dugundji, or Willard as all of them are already checked out....I would like to hear your opinions about their pros and cons, and how they are compared to Munkres. Please help me!

    P.S.
    I read Armstrong, Kahn, and Hocking, and I found the last two books to be better than Munkres (I did not like Armstrong's exposition). I never read Kelley, Dugundji, and Willard...
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 6, 2016 #2
    Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: How are Kelley, Dugundji, and Willard compared to Munkres?
  1. Munkres' Topology (Replies: 2)

  2. Topology by Munkres (Replies: 1)

Loading...