How Can I Enter a New Research Field and Understand Scientific Papers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
Entering a specialized field like theoretical high energy physics can be challenging, especially for those new to research. Many individuals struggle with understanding complex papers, particularly when they encounter technical details and equations that are not fully explained. It's common to feel overwhelmed and question one's suitability for the field. Effective communication with supervisors is crucial; having a supportive relationship where questions can be freely asked can significantly aid in the learning process. Engaging with the material through discussions with mentors, seeking clarification on difficult concepts, and gradually building foundational knowledge are essential strategies for overcoming initial hurdles in research.
ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I'm asking a stupid question, but it puzzled me a lot.
Recently, I am wondering about "how to enter a field or subject?"

I am a research assistant now and I'm trying to read papers of my boss's subject.
He is a theoretical string theorist.
I found I was stuck at various technical part of each paper.
I'm eagerly to catch up with the progress of his research,
but when I read papers, I often can't derive equations of that paper.

To complete the omitted technical details of a paper seems to be a basic ability.
I am starting to worrying about if I'm appropriate to do theoretical high energy physics.
To be honest, I have no experience in research.
Now, I'm really depressed by a lot of stuff and equations suddenly bomb.

So, I want to know how you guys work with your boss?
How you guys "read a paper?"
Thank you so much!

Sincerely
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is the relationship between you and your boss? Is he willing to answer your questions?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top