The solution using the Fourier series of x and Parseval's Identity to prove that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \sum_{n=1}^{∞} \frac{1} {n^2} = \frac{\pi^2} {6} [/tex]

doesn't seem to work for exponents higher than 2, why?

For example, I found the Fourier coefficients of [itex] - \frac{x^2} {4} [/itex] to be

[itex] \frac{(-1)^{n+1}} {n^2} [/itex].

So if I use the same reasoning as in the Basel problem:

[tex] \sum_{n=1}^{∞} \frac{1} {n^4} = \frac{1} {\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \frac{x^4} {16} dx = \frac{\pi^4} {40}[/tex]

which is not even close to the correct value.

How come when Euler does it, it works like magic, but when I try to do the same thing, it fails? Am I doing something wrong? Is Parseval's Identity valid only for the function f(x) = x?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How come the trick used to prove the Basel problem doesn't work for other values?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**