1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Schools How difficult is it for an international student to get into a top US university?

  1. Apr 21, 2009 #1
    What are the requirements for entry as a freshman at say, MIT? (Studying physics of course). I've heard its highly competitive... All and any help would be greatly appreciated!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2009 #2

    thrill3rnit3

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    be the best of the best...simply put
     
  4. Apr 21, 2009 #3
    Extremely difficult. If your not top 2-3 in your class, forget it.
     
  5. Apr 21, 2009 #4
    Take a look at http://web.mit.edu/registrar/stats/geo/index.html, and divide by 4 to get some idea of how many people from your country MIT admits every year.

    You have the $200K you'll need to pay for it if you do get in, right?

    Top US universities are not very friendly to international undergraduate admissions. Your odds (and opportunities for funding) are much better for graduate school.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 24, 2017
  6. Apr 22, 2009 #5
    Yeah, I was afraid of that... Statistically, MIT recruits about 0.5 South Africans yearly, so the odds are not looking good...

    From what I gather, the money shouldn't be a problem though, (IF by some miracle I get in) because (correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this applies to international students as well) MIT waives the fee if your families net income is less than $75 000 p.a. Fortunately, my parents are underpaid teachers. (Did I just say that?)

    I really don't want to seem arrogant, but lets assume for the sake of an argument my school academics are acceptable. Is that enough, or do I have to have solid extracurricular acheivements, like winning an international science fair or something? Any ideas for something more reachable?

    Thanks for the comments thrill3rnit3, Howers and TMFKAN64. I appreciate your help!
     
  7. Apr 22, 2009 #6
    Getting 99% won't even make sure your in. You need a lottt of extracurricular stuff and they must be important...
     
  8. Apr 22, 2009 #7
    So you need extracurricular stuff also for the graduate programs or research experience, top GPA and good GRE scores are enough?
     
  9. Apr 22, 2009 #8
    Most applicants will have those, including many domestic ones. They may be enough for them to consider you, but you have a much better chance of being accepted if you have something that distinguishes you from the applicant pool (in a positive way, of course). Otherwise, you're just one of hundreds of equally qualified candidates. Why should they choose you and not someone else? You better come up with a good reason, because everyone else will be trying to.
     
  10. Apr 22, 2009 #9
    Could someone define "extracurricular stuff"? To win in a physics olympiad, or something like that?

    I agree that one should have a strong application package to get into top grad schools. I think the most important thing, the one that can distinguish you from the crowd is your research potential (if you have, of course, top grades, GRE, etc).
     
  11. Apr 22, 2009 #10
    Thanks for the input, everyone. I agree with Xmavidis; could anyone specify what sort of thing you could do to stand out from the crowd?
     
  12. Apr 23, 2009 #11
    Judging by your responses in this thread, you have no hope of going up against the best of the best in a test of math/science ability. Your best bet is to fill some niche position in their incoming class as the admissions folks are much easier on people with rather rare talents (at least by a technical school's standards). You might play in your city's orchestra in your spare time, for example.
     
  13. Apr 23, 2009 #12
    Second that.Top colleges try to fill their class (at least at the undergraduate level) with different types of students. Generally, there are two categories:

    Category 1: Trying to buy your way into them top colleges (depending on how top we are talking about? top Ivies versus lower Ivies) via math/physics/specific talents would be much much much harder since it relies on raw talent. You have to be talented enough for them to want you (being good, passionate and the likes are not enough here).

    Category 2: Doing something else like cool extra curriculum (volunteering, student government, etc), getting decent grades, tests, recs and writing a decent essay is more achievable, just still gets you in. But if you are in this category, then a shot of luck is necessary since most applicants are in this category as well.
     
  14. Apr 23, 2009 #13
    I was about to say "not for international students"... but no, it seems that MIT tries to meet all demonstrated need for international students as well. I don't think that this is common though... but I could be wrong.

    Anyway, getting into any top school in the US isn't a matter of having good enough grades and test scores... you have to show them that you are a Special and Precious Flower, Unique Among Your Peers. (Of course if you *don't* have good grades and test scores, you have no chance!) What have you done that none of the other applicants have done? Or what have you done better than *all* the other applicants?

    Grad school is a bit easier... extracurricular activities beyond research don't really matter. Just make sure that your letters of recommendation resemble the one that John Nash received: "This man is a genius."
     
  15. Apr 23, 2009 #14

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    There are a few comments I'd like to make. First is that it's a good idea to look at the background of people who are replying to you, and perhaps weight replies from people who are still in high school differently than those who have gone through the process.

    Second, there aren't a set of requirements such that if you make them, you're in. Instead, the admissions office accepts the 1600 students who they feel are best suited to the Institute.

    Finally, I think you need to think seriously about the fact that they accepted 2 students from your country in the last 4 years. Are you the best student countrywide? If not, you may want to broaden your horizons and cast a wider net.
     
  16. Apr 23, 2009 #15

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think many non-US students don't realize that (for better or worse) undergraduate education at most colleges and universities in the US is not purely an academic experience. It's a "lifestyle experience" in which interaction with fellow students with a diverse range of backgrounds and interests can be an important and explicit goal of the school. Selecting students isn't simply a matter of ranking test scores or high-school grades. Athletics is the most visible factor, but other non-academic factors can make a difference as well.

    The top universities such as MIT and Caltech have a huge pool of applicants with excellent academic qualifications. They can pick and choose students so as to get a mixture that they consider to be beneficial from a social point of view, while still maintaining top academic quality.
     
  17. Apr 23, 2009 #16
    Firstly, I know I've already thanked everyone twice, but I'll do it once more: Thanks for all input, I appreciate every word.

    Okay, I can see now that I haven't been clear about some things.

    Firstly, I was just using MIT as a example (although it would admittedly be my first choice in a perfect world); this thread is really about any top US university. (I'm not considering UK ones for financial reasons.)

    Secondly:

    I'm not entirely sure what I said that suggested that. Probably "Yeah, I was afraid of that... " That was in reference to the low admission rate... I should have been clearer; I apologise. I'm a straight-A student, min. 95% in Physical Science and Mathematics. The thing is, that I'm sure the same could be said of most MIT applicants and I worry that I'll need more.

    Re: the "Special and precious flower" (lol) theme that many have mentioned: Hopefully my personality will help me. (Sport certainly won't!) I do have a passion for physics; in fact I see it less as a career and more as a calling. As for rare skills... well, I can lick my elbow...

    P.S. To VincentPham: recs?
     
  18. Apr 23, 2009 #17

    thrill3rnit3

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    recs - recommendation letters
     
  19. Apr 23, 2009 #18

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    For example, most large universities have symphony orchestras. Even MIT has one! (I have one of their recordings.) So if you're good at an uncommon instrument like the contrabassoon, that might be a plus factor. Violinists are probably dime a dozen at that level.
     
  20. Apr 23, 2009 #19

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    But not if they admitted another contrabassonist last year.
     
  21. Apr 23, 2009 #20
    Recommendation letters, of course! Thanks, I'll speak to my teachers about that.

    MIT has an orchestra? Wow. Of course, that won't help me. I only play the piano and the guitar, and not at a professional level in either case! Nevertheless, I'd like to get hold of one of those recordings...

    I'll search Youtube.

    Incidentally:
    Not to mention the Thought Police!
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2009
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: How difficult is it for an international student to get into a top US university?
Loading...