I have only taken QM for a semester so I'm sure there are a lot of gaps in my understanding. Here is my question: The original electron orbiting around the nucleus like planets around the sun model was rejected partly because the radiation (energy loss) was not taken into consideration. I thought the new QM model was supposed to fix it. However with the hydrogen atom we learned, there are still these stationary eigenstates of energy. Even though we don't have a point electron anymore (replaced with a wave of probabibility), doesn't the electron still have angular momentum/acceleration/etc which allows it to radiate? If this is true, then how can there be any stationary states? Why don't the solutions to the hydrogen atom we learn involve a decay in energy? Thanks a lot in advance!!!!!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How does QM solve the bohr atom problem?

Loading...

Similar Threads - does solve bohr | Date |
---|---|

I Does the concept of an "object" belong in Quantum Mechanics? | Feb 22, 2018 |

Does Decoherence Solve the Measurement Problem Completely | Nov 21, 2012 |

Solving the Schrodinger Equation: WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? | Jan 22, 2012 |

How does Quantum Physics solve the ultraviolet catastrophe? | Jul 9, 2011 |

Why does decoherence not fully solve the measurement problem? | Mar 10, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**