- #1
orgohell
- 3
- 0
Hey guys, I am having trouble understanding/explaining some of the trends in ionization energy with calculated Zeff by slaters rules.
For example I was asked why is the 3rd ionization energy for Be greater then the 3rd ionization energy for O
My train of thought was to say its pulling an electron from a complete shell in Be (1s2) vs. pulling an electron from the 2p orbital...but how do I explain this with Zeff?
-Zeff of the 1s electron of Be2+ is=4-(1 x 0.35)=3.65
-Zeff of the 2p electron of O2+ is=8-(2 x .85)-(3 x 0.35)=5.25
so the p electron in the O still has a higher Zeff and wouldn't that mean its held tighter to the nucleus and more difficult to remove?
What am I missing here?
For example I was asked why is the 3rd ionization energy for Be greater then the 3rd ionization energy for O
My train of thought was to say its pulling an electron from a complete shell in Be (1s2) vs. pulling an electron from the 2p orbital...but how do I explain this with Zeff?
-Zeff of the 1s electron of Be2+ is=4-(1 x 0.35)=3.65
-Zeff of the 2p electron of O2+ is=8-(2 x .85)-(3 x 0.35)=5.25
so the p electron in the O still has a higher Zeff and wouldn't that mean its held tighter to the nucleus and more difficult to remove?
What am I missing here?