Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How much mass?

  1. Feb 8, 2005 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I think this is the right place to ask, how much "gravitating", matter
    is needed, in LQG and String, for our universe to be as it is. and how
    critical is this "density".
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 8, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    wolram, I do not think that either LQG or stringy theories are sufficiently well-developed to provide a figure for the critical density

    however, ordinary 1915 Gen. Rel. does provide a basis for calculating the critical density
    the formula for calculating it basically just the Friedmann equation and it gives a figure of about

    0.83 joules per cubic kilometer.

    the usual estimate is that this 0.83 joules is broken down between 73 percent dark energy and 27 percent matter (of which most is dark matter)

    so if you want to know how much "matter" (dark and baryonic combined) then it is 27 percent of 0.83 joules

    this is about 0.22 joules per cubic kilometer. (baryonic and dark matter combined)

    the word "density" just means so-and-so much of something per unit volume
    and there is no certain total volume, one can only guess about whether it is finite or infinite and what it is if it is finite.
    so one is better off just talking about density----so and so much per cubic km or cubic lightyear.
    besides, it is the density at each point that determines the curvature at that point. So the density is the relevant thing, not the total.

    the density, whether it is measured or inferred, turns out to be amazingly sparse by human standards. 0.22 joules is a small amount of energy already and it would seem even more tiny if expressed as a mass equivalent (miniscule fraction of a nanogram)---but all that means is that space, on average, is extraordinarily empty and if it were not so empty then it would not appear flat

    what they mean by "critical density" is the value which is necessary for the universe to be flat
    and since it appears to be flat (people keep checking this in everyway they can think of) the actual density is believed to be at or close to the critical level.
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2005
  4. Feb 9, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    This is disappointing i thought that at least LQG or STRING could
    predict a value for cosmological constants, if it cannot what is reason of pursing them?
  5. Feb 9, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    LQG is still working hard on showing from first principles that four dimensional time-space exists. String theory isn't much better off. Both are working hard to show that what they predict resembles GR. THe reason to pursue them is the hope that someday you will have a theory that gives you the source code for the universe.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook