How Persistent Is Life?

  • Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date
  • #1
462
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I think that once life starts, it will be very difficult to stop and I have been reading more and more about scientists claim life to be common in the universe, or atleast not as rare as they once thought it was.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
137
0
Life is a wide world; can u define it?
 
  • #3
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
Gold Barz said:
I think that once life starts, it will be very difficult to stop and I have been reading more and more about scientists claim life to be common in the universe, or atleast not as rare as they once thought it was.
These scientists are only guessing. Until we either find other life or fully understand the process of its formation, there's no reason to trust such claims.
 
  • #4
462
0
That is true but I also have no reason to believe why it could be rare, key ingredients for life has been found in abundance in deep space
 
  • #5
500
0
There are living things that live normally in such a wide array of environments here on earth that I am almost postivie that there is life somewhere else. There are living things in the hottest of geysers. There are living things in toxic waste just fine. Some living things die when exposed to oxygen.
 
  • #6
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
It must be frusterating being a scientist. "yes there has to be life all out there in the universe! but damn it, we cant get out of htis freaken solar system!!! What are you rocket scientists doing with all the money that is given to you"
 
  • #7
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
moose said:
There are living things that live normally in such a wide array of environments here on earth that I am almost postivie that there is life somewhere else.
That assumes that the initial formation of life is a common event, something you can't necessarily infer from your observations. All you can infer is that, once formed, life can survive in a lot of environments. We can be certain that there are planets out there that can support life.

I tend also to think there's life elsewhere, but I have to admit that I'm only guessing. We really need to have a better idea of how life initially formed.
 
  • #8
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
ST is, of course, correct. By my thinking, this is a case for the principle of mediocrity - whatever happens here will happen in most other places with the same initial conditions. Decades ago, this reasoning predicted other [at least sun-like] stars probably have planets. We now know that for a fact - and in fact, it appears planets are the rule, not the exception. However, until an extra terrestrial life form is actually found [and Mars is still an excellent candidate], it is merely speculation. Realistically though, would any scientist bet the house this is the only life bearing planet in the galaxy?
 
  • #9
Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,574
105
We don't know how life started, but we do know that on an astrophysical time scale it happened quickly.

The earliest signs of life date from just a few hundred million years after the Earth became stable enough (against cosmic impacts) to support life. Therefore it might be that life has started elsewhere relatively quickly too. However the earliest forms of life, the archaebacteria (3.5 Gyr. ago), and other later bacteria, were 'rulers of the Earth' until eukaryotic cells evolved about 1.3 Gyr. ago. Thus nucleated cells, which then evolved into mutlicellular organisms, have only existed for about a third of the time life has been on Earth.

Perhaps there are many planets inhabited by bacteria and nothing else?

Garth
 
  • #10
462
0
There are signs that microbial life may be common.
 
  • #11
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
Gold Barz said:
There are signs that microbial life may be common.
No there aren't, but I think few scientists would bet against the existence of extraterrestrial microbial life.
 
  • #13
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
Can you be more specific about which part of that you think is evidence for extra-terrestrial life?
 
  • #14
462
0
Here

"In my view, life in the form of microbes or their equivalents is very common in the universe" - Frank Drake, Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of California at Santa Cruz.

"There is no solid evidence of life elsewhere, but several factors suggest it is common. Organic material is widespread in the interstellar medium and in our own solar system. We have found planetary systems around other sun-like stars. Also, we know that microbial ecosystems can survive in a variety of environments with liquid water and a suitable chemical energy source or sunlight. " - Chris McKay, planetary scientist with the Space Science Division of NASA.

"I presume that we are in agreement that microbial life, at least, may be common in our stellar neighborhood and even may be present on other planets" - Michael Meyer, the Senior Scientist for astrobiology at NASA Headquarters.

"I think it is a mistake to look at the many specific peculiarities of Earth's biosphere, and how unlikely such a combination of characteristics seems, and to then conclude that complex life is rare. This argument can only be used to justify the conclusion that planets exactly like Earth, with life exactly like Earth-life, are rare. - David Grinspoon, Principal Scientist in the Department of Space Studies.

These arent just normals folk talking.
 
  • #15
SpaceTiger
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,940
2
Gold Barz said:
"There is no solid evidence of life elsewhere
That's all that matters at this point. The rest is just speculation. From a scientific point of view, informed speculation doesn't constitute evidence or a sign of the existence of extraterrestrial life.
 
  • #16
462
0
"but several factors suggest it is common"

Maybe I was wrong to type in "signs".
 
  • #17
i agree that all we have is speculation, but even by freak accidebts at near-impossible odds (trillion to one or more) there must be hundreds of forms of life in the universe.
 
  • #18
453
0
think about these two points:

the components of life on Earth are made of elements that are some of the most abundant substances coughed out of exploding stars- the stuff is everywhere

the components of life on Earth find their origins in molecular chains of these common substances- the structures of the chains that create Amino Acids and Proteins are some of the most simple and fundamental topological forms that atomic bonds allow
 
  • #19
462
0
That is why I think life is common, because the key ingredients for it are found in abundance in the universe and if life is common, then surely once in a while human-like intelligence will arise, especially in complex environments where the environment encourages intelligence. As Chronos said intelligence is efficient and has huge survival value.
 

Related Threads on How Persistent Is Life?

Replies
3
Views
300
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
94
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
6K
Top