How Prove a process is Markov?

  • Thread starter vale
  • Start date
3
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

This is my first time here, so... Hi everybody!

I've very little time to figure out the following problem ... and Im wandering if some of you can give me any help or just suggest me any good reading material...

The question is how you can prove a process [tex] P_t[/tex], given the dynamics, is Markov.
In short my process is on alternate intervals, a mean reverting brownian bridge [tex]dP_t = \frac{\alpha}{G-t}(Q-P_t)dt + \sigma dW_t [/tex], and a mean reverting proportional volatility process : [tex]dP_t = K(\theta -P_t)dt + \nu dW_t [/tex]. The length of the intervals and their occurence is determined by an exogenous bootstrap procedure, which I believe, doesn't give any problems, being a resampling procedure with replacement, it doesn't generate any dependence with the past history...

How should I procede on your opinion? Any hints ?

Thank you very much in advance,
Vale
 

Answers and Replies

EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,285
123
Could this be of any help? When you say prove, do you mean empirically or mathematically?
 
3
0
Thank you for the reference and the reply!

Actually I meant a mathematical proof....
I think I should show somehow the transition probabilities are independent from the past realizations... but I don't Know how to retrieve them from the dynamic... :uhh:

Many thanks...
Vale
 
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,285
123
I guess I'd argue W(t) is independent of the past. Then equate Eq. (1) to Eq. (2) and solve for P(t). It'll be a function of t, W(t) and some constants. Since W is independent of the past, so's P(t).

{P.S. Oh, whoops! You said "on alternating intervals." Does that mean the two Eq's do not hold simultaneously?}

{P.P.S. In that case:

P(t+1) = P(t) + dP(t) = P(t) + a(dt) P(t) + b dW(t) = [a(dt)+1] P(t) + b dW(t).

Et+1[P(t+1)|P(t),P(t-1)...,P(0)] = (a+1) Et+1[P(t)|P(t),P(t-1)...,P(0)] + b Et+1[dW(t)|P(t),P(t-1)...,P(0)] = (a+1) P(t) + b Et+1[dW(t)]. QED

The last step is based on two premises: (i) E[X|X,Y,Z,...] = X, and (ii) dW(t) is independent of past history so E[dW(t)|P(t),P(t-1)...,P(0)] = E[dW(t)].}
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: How Prove a process is Markov?

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
583
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top