Is Physical Education Necessary for Becoming a Scientist?

  • Thread starter eax
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Scientist
In summary, becoming a scientist can take about 10 years or more depending on specialization and it is necessary to have a job during those 10 years to pay for education. Many scientists start their career by getting an undergraduate degree, which may be funded by scholarships, and then getting paid for going to graduate school. Physical education is mandatory in school to promote physical activity and prevent laziness. Scientists may not make a lot of money, but there are opportunities to make a good income by becoming an engineer or patenting discoveries. However, the true motivation for pursuing a career in science should be the love and fascination
  • #1
eax
61
0
To become a scientist it takes about 10years maby more depending where you want to specialize.

At all these 10 years I will need a job to make the money for my education. If anyone is working there way up or is already, where do you or did you get your money for education. If from a job what job.

Im in high school right now grade11. Iam taking physics, chemistry, math, English this semester. Previously (relevant) courses I took are biology + prerequisites for all those.

Why is physical education mandatory, its not even education you just play sports all day. And I still have to take it. And Iam lazy and just sleep on my spare time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
eax said:
To become a scientist it takes about 10years maby more depending where you want to specialize.

At all these 10 years I will need a job to make the money for my education. If anyone is working there way up or is already, where do you or did you get your money for education. If from a job what job.

Im in high school right now grade11. Iam taking physics, chemistry, math, English this semester. Previously (relevant) courses I took are biology + prerequisites for all those.

Once you have your undergrad degree, for which you may or may not have to pay for your education depending on scholarships you might receive, in the sciences, you get paid for going to grad school. It's nowhere near what you'd earn if you got a job straight out of college, but when you consider you're getting an education as well, it's a pretty decent arrangement.

Why is physical education mandatory, its not even education you just play sports all day. And I still have to take it. And Iam lazy and just sleep on my spare time.

That's why it's mandatory, to get the lazy kids up off their bums at least a few hours a week.
 
  • #3
being lazy is why you have to take PE. you wouldn't get any exercise without it. Take more English classes to get your spelling and grammar above a 5th grade level and start filling out forms for scholarships and grants. Look for a boring job where you can do your homework while you are sitting around (gas station cashier, security) or look for a job that reimburses you for college. There are a lot of companies out there that will do that.
 
  • #4
You don't become a scientist to make money, and if you wondering where you'll be working after your undergraduate (Bachelors) education and between grad school here is a list of places:
WalMart, Subway (Eat Fresh), Lab monkey, plumber (especially if you majored in Civil, Environmental, or Chemical engineering), bartender, DJ (especially applicable if you hold BSEE or BSME), drafter, maybe even as a junior engineer or a lab technician
 
  • #5
You don't become a scientist to make money

then how do you make money as a scientist?

Take more English classes to get your spelling and grammar above a 5th grade level
Or perhaps I did that to emphasize my lazyness :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
eax said:
then how do you make money as a scientist?

You dont. You become an engineer, and if you are intelligent enough and patent some of your genius revelations, you'll make some money
 
  • #7
cronxeh said:
You dont. You become an engineer, and if you are intelligent enough and patent some of your genius revelations, you'll make some money

:grumpy: What's with all this whinning on scientists not making any money. Trust me, there are lots of engineers that do ordinary desk jobs all the time. Having an engineering degree does not mean you are a good engineer. Like i said before, lots of physicists are doing "engineering"-like jobs in various fields like semi-conductors, photonics, micro-electronics. They do the interesting stuff like looking at the frontiers of material science : what are the possible applications of one type of material.

To the original poster, i suggest you browse through my journal and look for the "what is a physicist"-entry (i think it is on the 3rd or 4th page). I listed some links there with official statistics on science earnings. Don't worry about money. if you are any good and you have some management-brain, you'll make lots of it...

Trust me on that, been there, done that :wink: do what you are really interested in...follow your heart...

marlon
 
  • #8
https://www.physicsforums.com/journal.php?s=&action=view&journalid=13790&perpage=10&page=4 [Broken]
here is the link

marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
http://fastweb.monster.com/fastweb/content/focus/story/3770.ptml?ID= [Broken]

and this link proves that engineers don't make as much as they like to think (generally that is)

marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
cronxeh said:
You don't become a scientist to make money
Yeah, I don't study physics to become a rich man. I study physics because it is fascinating.
 
  • #11
marlon always misses my point.

if you are a scientist who is starting to make money, chances are you are now an engineer
 
  • #12
Life has many sides, and you need some skill at all of them. Mant people become mathematicians or scientists purely because they love the work, and they are content if they make enough money to spend most of their time doing the research work they love.

But this is rare, and getting more rare under an administration run by luddites like the current one. Scientists also have children, and when they start to grow up, suddenly the scientist needs to put food regularly on the table, and then also pay for the very expensive education of the budding young potential scientist in the family.

In the 1960's when I was young student, Jack Kennedy was in the white house, and life was very different indeed. Corporations were encouraged to put up merit scholarship money for bright kids to go to the best schools, and places like Harvard and Princeton, began to be home to poor kids who had the ambition and talent to study hard enough to excel. Many of us went to such schools even though we could not even afford the train tickets to get there and had to hitchike back and forth.

Nowadays a "merit scholarship" pays only a couple of thousand a year, as compared to more than full tuition at Harvard in the 1960's, which would translate into over $30,000 a year now.

So if you want to be a scientist, you must do it because you love it, but you must also be aware that survival is important. As simple a thing as physical education is useful, since scientists sometimes work 30 or 40 hours in a row, and you cannot do that if you are physically unfit.

It is also wise to have a skill that is worth money, such as computer or network savvy, so you can moonlight and actually earn something. In my job, the people with the best research track records are often barewly keeping heads above water, while those who have had less research succes but who have taught themselves computer skills, often by simply teaching the numerical analysis courses are better off.

Everyone, especially poor people, needs to know how to shop wisely, cook reasonably, and maintain a car, or even a house. If you can even train a dog, you can earn extra money.

You also need to learn to write clearly and persuasively, so you can communicate with others, and possibly attract grant money for your work.

by the way, I hope you are joking, as there are no lazy but successful scientists. If you are interested in money and science, you might tilt toward the biological and medical sciences. Some decades ago at least it was reported that something like 51% of all federal research moneu was in those fields, while physical and mathematical sciences accounted for only 1.7%.

Some university administrators evaluate research quality literally by the dollar amount of grant money attracted, so by that metric, a mediocre scientist who brings in large grants could be better regarded than a brilliant one who does not.

but to be happy in your work, you have to choose it because it facinates you, not because it pays well. Still you cannot afford to let finances force you out of your field. this balancing act takes some thought and skill.

By the way, education is cheap, or even free, for the truly exceptional student. Strive to be that student and professors will go out of their way to teach you, and graduate programs will pay you to attend. Well funded researchers will support you to work with them. But lazy students will not have this experience.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
The most important thing is to work without too much stress. Find a job that can give you less stress. Otherwise, you will want to retire early.
 
  • #14
If I was truly lazy I wouldn't be trying.
I don't know what conclusions people have come up about me, here's about me:

I like to play tennis,
I like physics,
I like joking around - who doesn't?( I live on a chair, I sit on it, eat on it, study on it, and use it for other mobile perposes :wink: )

I am lazy - when I say this what I mean is to find the laziest valid solution. E.g. recently I learned about functions in math. Now I just write down a formula once.

Why is physical education mandatory, its not even education you just play sports all day. And I still have to take it. And Iam lazy and just sleep on my spare time.
This was just a joke on me. If it was true I would be sleeping now. The first time I took it all spots were filled, second type all spots were filled, third time it canceled. They needed about 2 more people to join the course. I just joke about it as being lazy.

Currently I have joined a programming contest, math contest, and trying to join a biology contest, my teacher was discouraging every grade11 student from joining it to make sure there is enough room for grade12 students that want it. I found this out because one teacher came into my class and I asked for more info and that's what he said.

Clearly now we may see that I am not lazy. I just say I am (lazy stupid etc...) for the fun of it.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
don't worry about our opinion of you. that seems to be all you have been concerned with. what about heeding the advice?
 
  • #16
mathwonk said:
You also need to learn to write clearly and persuasively, so you can communicate with others, and possibly attract grant money for your work.

any suggestions as to how i could improve my writing skills? i personally do not like writing essays due to the fact that i am not really good at writing and it takes a lot of effort on my part to write a decent paper...
 
  • #17
just keep at it. it always takes a lot of work. writing is hard work. i went to a liberal arts college thinking i could write, and just got royally reamed on all my early work (I still remember the first comment: "Unoriginal and dull. Where are YOU in this essay?!), and even my later work. i took courses in shakespeare and "bildungsroman" and philosophy, and so on, and eventually got better. now my writing is probably ok, but it takes enormous work. i rewrite and rewrite everything that has to be good.
 
  • #18
jai6638 said:
any suggestions as to how i could improve my writing skills? i personally do not like writing essays due to the fact that i am not really good at writing and it takes a lot of effort on my part to write a decent paper...

Persevering when the going gets rough is a really important trait in a scientist. If your writing needs improvement, keep forcing yourself to work on it. In science, you'll face a lot more criticism than accolades, some of it warranted, some of it not. The ability and inner strength to keep moving forward despite that is what makes the difference between someone who is successful in science and someone who finds another career.

To primarygun, science is stressful. Even if you enjoy it, there are a lot of pressures. If you love it, you'll be able to handle the stress (see perseverance comment above).

To eax, I don't know if you really think you're lazy or just joking around, but you won't succeed in science if you aren't willing to work hard. You work long hours, face challenges that nobody else has faced (or it wouldn't be science, it would be history), and find solutions to problems nobody else has solved. It's an amazing rush when you succeed, there's the thrill of the challenge as you're working toward a solution, and doing anything else with your time would seem boring, but, there's no question it's hard work and can wear you down when things aren't working well. I guess you have to be a little stubborn even. If your personality is such that you don't roll with the punches well and don't like being pushed out of your comfort zone, science isn't for you.

On the other hand, if you like having everything well defined and enjoy a little science, but don't really feel you have what it takes to be truly innovative, there is always a need for technicians. They carry out a lot of the routine lab work that is essential to completion of experiments, but don't really develop any of the ideas or design the experiments, they more or less follow recipes. An experienced technician does know when to question a method or technique and can offer good advice about feasibility, but they always need to check their ideas with the investigator to ensure there isn't a good reason for doing things differently. Most technicians have a master's degree, but some have only a bachelor's degree and learn more as they do the job.
 
  • #19
how does being an engineer compare to being a scientist? does engineering require less work?
 
Last edited:
  • #20
jai6638 said:
how does being an engineer compare to being a scientist? does engineering require less work?


My older brother is doing biomedical engineering at the moment, and i think he does as much work as a scientist, if not more.
 
  • #21
:rofl:So it it that easy to become a scientist??
Ta, Claire:cool:
 
  • #22
Job Success Step One. First, if you haven’t already done so, make a thorough examination of yourself as to whether you really do want to go into science and become a scientist. Do you know what becoming a scientist entails? Spend a few days, or longer, doing this self examination. Just make sure that becoming a scientist is really what you want to do. The following may sound cliché to you, but it is very true: so many people just rush into a job because they do not know of what else is out there. So do take a little time out of your busy schedule to reflect if this is what you would like to do for the rest of your life. There is nothing wrong about being a scientist. You may really like it. Just make sure that your temperament and personality fit this type of job and that you know what a typical day of being a scientist is like.

Different people are suited to different jobs. You will excel and be happier in a job that suits you more than in one that is molded onto you by society. All jobs are worthy because everyone can make a difference to society in any job. We need cashiers, people dumping garbage, taxi drivers, computer programmers, etc. In choosing your favorite occupation and excelling in it, you will make your stamp in this world most pronounced.

Job Success Step Two. Get good marks. In order to qualify for university and graduate school, you will need good marks throughout your entire academic journey. Try also to enjoy what you are learning and try to learn for the sake of learning.

Job Success Step Three. You will almost certainly need a graduate degree, likely a Ph.D. Try to find all the programs and schools that you think you might have an interest in and thoroughly read through their curriculum, admission policies, and the success rates of their graduates obtaining good positions. Prepare as early as possible for admission. You do not want to miss deadlines, or not do something that could easily have been done.

Job Success Step Four. Obtain some job experience or do some job shadowing with scientists. This will allow you to find out what being a scientist is like. Maybe you really hate it. Maybe you love it. It's a great opportunity to broaden your horizons even if you decide not to become a scientist in the future. Getting job or volunteer experience will also look very favorable to future employers, as they will know that you were capable enough that someone trusted you with their work. It will also allow you to get reference letters if you need any. Last, but not least, you will gain practical experience and contacts as a scientist that may help you in your future job.

Ta claire:approve:
 
  • #23
Job Success Step Five. Keep an eye on various places where there may be job postings right from day one that you decide you want to become a scientist. Even if you are not yet qualified for the job, job postings give you a very good idea about what type of skills employers are looking for. You may want to hone those skills or learn them during the next several years. Of course, with technology changing so rapidly, those same skills could become obsolete, so try to pick skills that you think will be around for a while and will be useful in the future in a broad range of situations.

Job Success Step Six. Decide if you want to specialize in the future. If you do, then you should try to go to a post-secondary institution that specializes in your particular specialty. It will make you a more attractive and competitive candidate when it comes time to look for a job. Be careful about specializing too early, though, or even specializing at all, as that specialty may become obsolete or not in as much demand when you are ready to go into the workforce. However, specializing definitely has its advantages, as you will be the recognized expert in your specialty. You may even be paid more, which is why many people specialize. So do consider it to be a viable option.

Job Success Step Seven. Choose your employer carefully. If you do not think that you would fit in a particular company, you probably should not even apply there. Of course, you should try not to be picky, but do try to make an effort to think a little about what type of company and work environment you desire. You don't want to be finding another job in two months.

Job Success Step Eight. Once you have a job as a scientist, try to distinguish yourself a little every day. The objective is not to get a promotion or a pay raise, although that would be a nice bonus, but just as a duty to yourself. A pledge to yourself to try to make your job a little bit better for other people. The extra effort will make yourself feel pleased, as well as really do a service to others. Also consider upgrading your skills once in a while by taking courses or learning by yourself. Try not to over-exert yourself, though, when working or when spending extra time to learn skills. But do put in a good day's work. Work in a relaxed manner. Work at a comfortable pace, but just do not slack at your duty. After all, it's your profession!

Wish you every success with your job as a scientist!

Ta, claire
 
  • #24
what subjects to be selected to become a scientist ? whether to take bio or commerce subjects ?
 
  • #25
eax said:
To become a scientist it takes about 10years maby more depending where you want to specialize.

At all these 10 years I will need a job to make the money for my education. If anyone is working there way up or is already, where do you or did you get your money for education. If from a job what job.

Im in high school right now grade11. Iam taking physics, chemistry, math, English this semester. Previously (relevant) courses I took are biology + prerequisites for all those.

Why is physical education mandatory, its not even education you just play sports all day. And I still have to take it. And Iam lazy and just sleep on my spare time.
You're an idiot. Studies have shown people who do extracurricular activities involving anything to do with physical activities generally do better in school as well. I know this is true for me. I went to do jiu jitsu and after that my grade went from 40% to 80%. So there. It really does make a difference. The people you meet are great. On top of that, pushing yourself to the limits and saying "i'm going to keep on going and going and never give up" is 10x harder than school. Atleast for me it is. Athletes have great mental strength and many never give up. Given a chance, I'm willing to bet they can EASILY obtain any degree they want just because they're such hard workers.

edit:

nvm saw you were kidding.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
Heh, what an old thread. Let's see, Eax made his post a little over five years ago, when he was in 11th grade. So he should have just graduated college last month. I wonder if he's going to grad school...
 
  • #27
please help me ! i want to become a scientist but i am confused help me that which subjects should i choose ?? kindly give a quick reply ... frm saba moreover i am in 8 th standard and i am confused whether to take bio or computers ? reply fast
 
  • #28
Not a Spam , check this article if you like the tips:

http://www.bescientist.info/how-to-study-science-and-math/ [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
This thread is 7 years old, the OP probably graduated already.
 

1. Why is physical education important for becoming a scientist?

Physical education is important for becoming a scientist because it promotes overall health and wellness. Scientists need to have a strong and healthy body in order to perform their experiments, conduct research, and spend long hours in the lab.

2. What specific physical skills does a scientist need?

A scientist needs to have good hand-eye coordination, balance, and dexterity in order to handle delicate equipment and perform precise experiments. They also need to have physical stamina to handle long hours of work and mental focus.

3. Can physical activity improve cognitive abilities for scientific thinking?

Yes, physical activity has been shown to improve cognitive abilities such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. These skills are crucial for scientific thinking and can be enhanced through regular physical exercise.

4. Is there a correlation between physical fitness and academic success in science?

Studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between physical fitness and academic success in science. Regular physical activity can improve brain function and memory, leading to better academic performance in the field of science.

5. How can scientists incorporate physical activity into their daily routine?

Scientists can incorporate physical activity into their daily routine by taking breaks to go for a walk or stretch, using a standing desk, or participating in fitness classes or sports outside of work. It is important for scientists to prioritize their physical health in order to excel in their field.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
521
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
811
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
501
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
859
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top