Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How to estimate star's mass without gravitation constant?

  1. Dec 10, 2004 #1


    User Avatar

    hi! title tells all
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 10, 2004 #2

    If it is a main sequence star, you can tell what spectral class it belongs to by looking at its color. Every class has certain features, among them mass.
  4. Dec 10, 2004 #3
    Using absolute luminosity, and the surface temperature(represented by spectral class), you could calculate the total Mass.
  5. Dec 10, 2004 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Welcome to Physics Forums smm! (and a belated welcome to orange as well).

    I'm not sure I understand smm's question ... no matter how you arrive at an estimate of the mass of a star, somewhere in the chain of observation and logic, you will use G.

    For example, if you estimate its mass from its absolute luminosity, you are relying indirectly on G, because theories which lead to an understanding of the mass-luminosity relationship have gravity (and hence G) as a key element. Similarly, if you use a mass-luminosity relationship as a purely observational device (i.e. you've observed enough stars to plot the relationship, even if you have no idea of why it should be like that), you'll find that observations which established the mass of stars in your empirical relationship depended on G.

    Perhaps you could clarify your question a bit for us please smm?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook