How to find inverse coordinates?

  • #1
Rick16
81
25
TL;DR Summary
given are x(u, v, w), y(u, v, w), z(u, v, w), and I want to find u(x, y, z), v(x, y, z), w(x, y, z)
Is there a systematic way to do it? In particular, I have the coordinates ##x=au \sin v \cos w##, ##y=bu\sin v\sin w##, ##z=cu\cos v##, where a, b, c are constants, and I want to find ##u(x,y,z)##, ##v(x,y,z)##, ##w(x,y,z)##. I could solve the three equations for u, v, and w and then try to insert the resulting equations into each other, and with a lot of fumbling around I may get the solutions that I want. But this does not seem to be the most rational approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Gavran
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much. I was able to solve it quickly with these substitutions.
 
  • #4
fresh_42 said:
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
 
  • #5
Gavran said:
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
 
  • #6
fresh_42 said:
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
 
  • #7
Gavran said:
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do. I showed a path, not a solution. ##u## is a radius and scaling it back again is no problem.
 
  • #8
fresh_42 said:
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do.
So it is better to use the next transformations: ## x'=a^{-1}x ##, ## y'=b^{-1}y ## and ## z'=c^{-1}z ##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
569
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top