It is obvious to me how(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

\hat {x} = x; \hspace{5 mm}

\hat {p}_x = -i \hbar \frac {\partial} {\partial x}

[/tex]

implies

[tex]

[ \hat {x} , \hat {p}_x ] = i \hbar

[/tex]

and I can accept that these two formulations are mathematically equivalent, but I do not know how in general (or even in this specific case) to go in the opposite direction, that is, to start with operators defined solely in terms of their commutation relations and change them into forms which show what they do to wave functions in the position basis.

Is this always possible, and if so, how?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How to go from Heisenberg operators to Schrödinger operators

Loading...

Similar Threads - Heisenberg operators Schrödinger | Date |
---|---|

I Heisenberg Picture | Jul 20, 2016 |

Instantaneous eigenstates in the Heisenberg picture | Dec 22, 2015 |

Trouble with Hermitian operators? | Nov 17, 2014 |

The uncertainty operator and Heisenberg | Feb 26, 2014 |

Time independent operators and Heisenberg eq - paradox? | Dec 7, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**