Moving Up in the Science Field

In summary, the OP is considering a career change to a Research Assistant or Graduate Student. They have a bachelor's degree and are interested in continuing their education. They feel that their time as a Lab Tech has helped them form better mental habits and has given them an opportunity to see what the career path might look like.
  • #1
Delong
400
17
I recently accepted a job as a Lab Tech. I am pretty happy about the job but I'd want to move on to something more like a Research assistant eventually. I don't know if anyone here is familiar with biology/biomedicine but is a jump like that possible? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, this is not possible.
 
  • #3
Delong said:
I recently accepted a job as a Lab Tech. I am pretty happy about the job but I'd want to move on to something more like a Research assistant eventually. I don't know if anyone here is familiar with biology/biomedicine but is a jump like that possible? Thanks.
What is your educational level? That's a key factor.
 
  • #4
Vanadium 50 said:
No, this is not possible.

Why would that not be possible? I'm not in the same field, but that would appear to be the natural progression.
 
  • Like
Likes Delong
  • #5
A Research Assistant is a graduate student. That's not the career path for technicians.
 
  • #7
Why is my response shocking? It's a yes/no question, and the answer is "no". Lab techs move up a different chain. You become a progressively more senior tech, and perhaps move into management - perhaps an ESHQ coordinator.
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
  • #8
Vanadium 50 said:
Why is my response shocking? It's a yes/no question, and the answer is "no".

"shocking" isn't the right word maybe. But I took it as a bit short and dismissive until I realized that you have tried to advise the OP in previous posts.

-Dave K
 
  • #9
CrysPhys said:
What is your educational level? That's a key factor.
I'm a bachelors degree
 
  • #10
dkotschessaa said:
Before readers find themselves shocked by @Vanadium 50 's reply note that there is some more history here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/am-i-ready-for-grad-school.900790/page-2#post-5671972

@Delong I'm not unsympathetic to your situation of course. But it does look like you've ignored a lot of advice you've gotten here in the past.

-Dave K
Well this IS the internet so you know it's not like my personal mentor or something... I like to go on this site for some perspective but a I'll admit I don't always listen to everything I read on here.

Also in my experience professors sometimes prefer to make me feel bad instead of five me life direction so I've learned to tune them out. Especially vanadium here I have blocked.
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
A Research Assistant is a graduate student. That's not the career path for technicians.
Oh I understand your perspective now, I think.

However, the OP has a bachelor's degree and was giving serious consideration to graduate school. Unless you are also implying that it is not possible for the OP to get into any graduate school, I still would not say that its impossible for this person.

Could the experience/exposure gotten from time as a lab tech gain this person any likelihood of getting into a masters program? Again, I ask these questions humbly and because I think they might add to the conversation's usefulness. Not because I think that you are wrong. I think you know about this more than I do, which is why I am asking instead of telling :thumbup:
 
  • #12
Delong said:
I'm a bachelors degree

You have to be more articulate if you want to be a research assistant or graduate student.
You are not a bachelors degree.
You HAVE a bachelor's degree.

Make perfect articulation into a habit. Strive for it constantly. Do not allow yourself to ignore semantics. Communication is critical in laboratories, or any scientific institution.
 
  • Like
Likes mic* and Delong
  • #13
Yea I have spent the past three years applying to graduate school twice and I recently got turned down again. I Will confess there have been some dark nights this past year when I got all my rejections. But it made me reflect that maybe I'm just not PhD material. I'm not the most disciplined student and accounts from others have told me that grad school can he quite a harrowing slough.

I'm focusing on getting work experience right now and maybe trying a few years later when I feel more experienced...I'm happy with my lab tech job for at least a year...
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
  • #14
Work experience might actually sharpen your mental habits. I was more acedemically primed than ever, after I had taken a 2 year break from school. I worked in a lab and formed better mental habits. School was more interesting to me after I had cultivated my curiosity in the lab.

My problem with school in my first attempt at college was that I was not curious and I took no pride in my work.
When I went to work in the lab, the environment cultivated my curiosity. I went from a C student to straight As in a gruelling engineering program WHILE I was working full time.
 
  • #15
RogueOne said:
Unless you are also implying that it is not possible for the OP to get into any graduate school, I still would not say that its impossible for this person.

I'm answering the question asked, without reading in any motivation. Besides, we don't need yet another thread on Delong and grad school.
 
  • #16
OK. There's obviously a lot of past history here. I think I had the same confusion as RogueOne, in that "Research Assistant", and various variants, is also a title used in industrial labs, and not restricted to grad students. In an industrial setting, one could advance from a lab tech to research assistant, either after X yrs of experience and a proven track record, or by getting a further degree part-time. E.g., in one industrial R&D lab I worked at, lead scientists and engineers, with a few exceptions, all had PhDs. Support personnel were classified as:

LA (HS): lab assistant
TA (2 yr associate): technical assistant
STA (4 yr bachelor): senior technical assistant.

At some point, HR decided "assistant" was not politically correct and changed it to "associate". Other labs use "research" instead of "technical".
 
  • Like
Likes Delong and RogueOne
  • #17
Part of the reason I wrote this thread is to proclaim to the world that I have what it takes to work I'm a lab woohoo!

After working in a lab I realized that science is not always the glamour bomb that I fantasized. Scientists may still sometimes find their work tedious and it requires a lot of patience and dealing with uneventful isolated tasks. In the lab scientists still chat but oftentimes they are concentrating on their pipet work and need silence.

Even with this realization I still want to work in science but I realized I need to build up a certain tolerance for tedium.
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
  • #18
Delong said:
Part of the reason I wrote this thread is to proclaim to the world that I have what it takes to work I'm a lab woohoo!

So yeah, let's take a moment to actually appreciate that. Tedious as it might be, it sounds like a decent job to have landed or a good start. You ARE contributing to your field (whatever the company does).

After working in a lab I realized that science is not always the glamour bomb that I fantasized. Scientists may still sometimes find their work tedious and it requires a lot of patience and dealing with uneventful isolated tasks. In the lab scientists still chat but oftentimes they are concentrating on their pipet work and need silence.

Even with this realization I still want to work in science but I realized I need to build up a certain tolerance for tedium.

I think very few scientists spent the majority of their time doing amazing whiz-bang stuff. So, not a bad tolerance to build. :D

Have you talked to the people you are working with? If the jobs you want exist in the company you are working for, they are the best people to speak with.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes Delong
  • #19
Delong said:
Well this IS the internet so you know it's not like my personal mentor or something... I like to go on this site for some perspective but a I'll admit I don't always listen to everything I read on here.

Also in my experience professors sometimes prefer to make me feel bad instead of five me life direction so I've learned to tune them out. Especially vanadium here I have blocked.

That's really too bad. I think you should re-interpret your experience in light of the fact that people actually ARE trying to give you good advice. Any feelings you are experience as a result of that are a result of your interpretation. They are not imposed upon you by the people giving it.

-Dave K
 
  • #20
RogueOne said:
Work experience might actually sharpen your mental habits. I was more acedemically primed than ever, after I had taken a 2 year break from school. I worked in a lab and formed better mental habits. School was more interesting to me after I had cultivated my curiosity in the lab.

My problem with school in my first attempt at college was that I was not curious and I took no pride in my work.
When I went to work in the lab, the environment cultivated my curiosity. I went from a C student to straight As in a gruelling engineering program WHILE I was working full time.

I relate to this. My break was a little longer.. kind of a decade-ish. I wouldn't recommend that long a break for anyone else!

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes Delong
  • #21
CrysPhys said:
OK. There's obviously a lot of past history here. I think I had the same confusion as RogueOne, in that "Research Assistant", and various variants, is also a title used in industrial labs, and not restricted to grad students. In an industrial setting, one could advance from a lab tech to research assistant, either after X yrs of experience and a proven track record, or by getting a further degree part-time. E.g., in one industrial R&D lab I worked at, lead scientists and engineers, with a few exceptions, all had PhDs. Support personnel were classified as:

LA (HS): lab assistant
TA (2 yr associate): technical assistant
STA (4 yr bachelor): senior technical assistant.

At some point, HR decided "assistant" was not politically correct and changed it to "associate". Other labs use "research" instead of "technical".
I like your answer today a scientist at the lab I worked at recommended that I go for a Master's. It's not as hard to get into as a PhD program and I'll still make myself look better than just a bachelor's wielder. I'm on my way to look for good programs right now...
 
  • #22
Delong said:
I like your answer today a scientist at the lab I worked at recommended that I go for a Master's. It's not as hard to get into as a PhD program and I'll still make myself look better than just a bachelor's wielder. I'm on my way to look for good programs right now...

Ah, so you think your issue getting into a graduate program was that you were applying for a PhD program? I usually thought that what happened (as in my case) was that if applying to a Phd Program you might get conditionally accepted in the master's program. After you earn your master's they re-evaluate.

-Dave K
 
  • #23
dkotschessaa said:
Ah, so you think your issue getting into a graduate program was that you were applying for a PhD program? I usually thought that what happened (as in my case) was that if applying to a Phd Program you might get conditionally accepted in the master's program. After you earn your master's they re-evaluate.

-Dave K

I believe that is school-dependent, at least in the US. In Canada, typically students intending to pursue graduate studies apply for and are admitted to a Masters program first, and only after completing the Masters program can they continue to a PhD program (assuming they intend to pursue a PhD program at a Canadian university).
 
  • Like
Likes dkotschessaa
  • #24
I don't know i talked with an admissions counselor and she said that some schools don't really want to admit masters degree students anyway. I guess because it doesn't ultimately benefit their program to offer just masters degrees.

Maybe I can just start doing research as a bachelors but so far none of the local institutions accept me. I got some luck doing research as a volunteer but that is not a feasible long term financial solution for me or anyone...

I literally have sent hundreds upon hundreds of jobs applications in the past four years and they all get turned down. I just want to do research I don't want to work at stupid restaurants anymore! Why does society have to be so difficult.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
The more I think about how hard it is for me to get a research job the angrier I get. Rejection after rejection really turns you into a sour person eventually.
 
  • #26
Delong said:
Why does society have to be so difficult.
It's not that "society" is so difficult -- it seems to me that you are reaping what you sowed.

From one of your earlier posts in another thread:
Delong said:
I focused on my own interests and less on what answers the professor wanted to hear.
That, and as I recall, playing chess and otherwise not focusing on your classes. As they say, those chickens have come home to roost.

Since you have nothing new to report, I am closing this thread.
 

1. How much experience do I need to move up from a Lab Tech position?

The amount of experience needed to move up from a Lab Tech position varies depending on the specific job or career path you are interested in. Generally, having at least 2-3 years of experience as a Lab Tech is a good starting point. However, some positions may require more or less experience, so it is important to research and understand the requirements for the specific job you are interested in.

2. What skills do I need to move up from a Lab Tech position?

In addition to technical skills related to laboratory procedures and equipment, employers often look for soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and attention to detail. Other important skills may include data analysis, project management, and critical thinking. It is also beneficial to have knowledge of relevant computer programs and software.

3. What education or training is necessary to move up from a Lab Tech position?

Many Lab Tech positions require at least a bachelor's degree in a related field such as biology, chemistry, or biochemistry. Some positions may also require a master's or doctoral degree, especially for more advanced research or managerial roles. Additionally, attending workshops, conferences, and other training programs can help you gain new skills and knowledge to advance in your career.

4. What are some potential career paths for someone who wants to move up from a Lab Tech position?

Some potential career paths for those looking to move up from a Lab Tech position include becoming a research scientist, laboratory manager, quality control specialist, or technical sales representative. Other options may include pursuing a career in teaching or moving into a different industry that utilizes laboratory skills, such as pharmaceuticals or biotechnology.

5. How can I make myself stand out and increase my chances of moving up from a Lab Tech position?

One way to make yourself stand out is to continually expand your skills and knowledge through additional education, training, and certifications. Networking with professionals in your field and taking on leadership roles within your organization can also help you gain visibility and showcase your abilities. Additionally, consistently performing at a high level and taking on new challenges and responsibilities can demonstrate your potential for advancement.

Similar threads

  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
6
Views
397
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
10
Views
746
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
679
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
20
Views
457
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Back
Top