How to show laminations minimizes eddy current?

In summary: So this is schoolwork?And if so, why haven't you been studying Faraday's Law as part of the preparation...
  • #1
kelvin490
Gold Member
228
3
In transformer, lamination is an effective method to minimize eddy current and thus energy loss. I just wonder how can we show that the energy loss due to eddy current in those laminates is added up to be less than that without lamination (suppose the total cross sectional areas are the same)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
kelvin490 said:
how can we show that the energy loss due to eddy current in those laminates is added up to be less than that without lamination (suppose the total cross sectional areas are the same)?
There are also losses in iron due to magnetic hysterisis in iron:

BHCurve.gif


I think the hysterisis losses will be the same, laminated iron or not. But anyway:

Connect the (unloaded) transformers to the mains supply. Measure their power consumptions by a watt-meter, or measure the temperature gradients of the cores.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #3
kelvin490 said:
In transformer, lamination is an effective method to minimize eddy current and thus energy loss. I just wonder how can we show that the energy loss due to eddy current in those laminates is added up to be less than that without lamination (suppose the total cross sectional areas are the same)?

What is the Relevant Equation for calculating the current in a loop with a changing magnetic field piercing the loop? What part of that equation are you affecting when you divide up a piece of metal into laminations that are insulated from each other? :smile:
 
  • #4
berkeman said:
What is the Relevant Equation for calculating the current in a loop with a changing magnetic field piercing the loop? What part of that equation are you affecting when you divide up a piece of metal into laminations that are insulated from each other? :smile:

I don't know...
 
  • #6
berkeman said:
Start with Faraday's Law, and see if you can figure out what happens when you replace one large area with many small ones that are insulated from each other...

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

:smile:

Path lengths are different, so the integral for one laminate is small. If I add it up, is it smaller than one large piece?
 
  • #7
kelvin490 said:
Path lengths are different, so the integral for one laminate is small. If I add it up, is it smaller than one large piece?

That may be one effect, but there is a more important one. Under Faraday's Law, when you have an area that has a changing flux, that induces a voltage around the loop area, which generates an eddy current in this case. Since the induced voltage and resulting eddy current depends on the _____ ...
 
  • #8
@kelvin490: You must regard that laminated iron is mixed up with silicon. This silicon decreases the magnetic proporties a little, but the electrical proporties (conductivity ) are decreased much more, thereby lowering the Eddy current.

So be cautious analysing the results of the measurements.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Hesch said:
So be cautious analysing the results of the measurements.
Solution to this problem:

Build a cube of laminated iron and make some coil that fits this cube. ( Saw a piece of the centerleg out of some transformer core ).

Now you induce a magnetic (AC) field parallel to the lamination, thereafter (moving the coil) induce the magnetic field perpendicular to the lamination.

Your measurements will be different ( I promise ). Think about why?

Is the magnetic field in a transformer parallel or perpendicular to the lamination?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Hesch said:
Solution to this problem:

Build a cube of laminated iron and make some coil that fits this cube. ( Saw a piece of the centerleg out of some transformer core ).

Now you induce a magnetic (AC) field parallel to the lamination, thereafter (moving the coil) induce the magnetic field perpendicular to the lamination.

Your measurements will be different ( I promise ). Think about why?

Is the magnetic field in a transformer parallel or perpendicular to the lamination?
Thanks for the answer. But I am not asking for experimental method to show they are different. Lamination has been used in transformers for years, why do I need experimental method to prove it?

What I ask is a theoretical approach.
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
That may be one effect, but there is a more important one. Under Faraday's Law, when you have an area that has a changing flux, that induces a voltage around the loop area, which generates an eddy current in this case. Since the induced voltage and resulting eddy current depends on the _____ ...

Area?
 
  • #12
kelvin490 said:
Area?

Yes! :smile:

The area ratios how with the circumference?
 
  • #13
berkeman said:
Yes! :smile:

The area ratios how with the circumference?

But we need to show their energy loss added up to be smaller than that in a larger, undivided area.
 
  • #14
kelvin490 said:
But we need to show their energy loss added up to be smaller than that in a larger, undivided area.

So this is schoolwork?

And if so, why haven't you been studying Faraday's Law as part of the preparation for this homework question?
 
  • #15
berkeman said:
So this is schoolwork?

And if so, why haven't you been studying Faraday's Law as part of the preparation for this homework question?

It's not HW.
 
  • #16
kelvin490 said:
What I ask is a theoretical approach.

If you google: eddy+current+losses you will find something like this: [/PLAIN]

http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/108105053/pdf/L-22%28TB%29%28ET%29%20%28%28EE%29NPTEL%29.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
BTW @kelvin490 -- Can you guess why higher frequency ferrite transformers do not have laminations? :smile:
 
  • #19
berkeman said:
BTW @kelvin490 -- Can you guess why higher frequency ferrite transformers do not have laminations? :smile:

High reactance?
 
  • #20
kelvin490 said:
High reactance?

No, not reactance...
 
  • #21
berkeman said:
No, not reactance...

low current.
 
  • #22
kelvin490 said:
low current.

Nope. What property of a magnetic material would minimize eddy currents?
 
  • #23
berkeman said:
Nope. What property of a magnetic material would minimize eddy currents?

High permeability.

btw, could you help me on the Ampere's law problem in another thread? May be it is a stupid question but I have no idea how to solve that problem.
 
  • #24
kelvin490 said:
High permeability.

Nope. Try googling Ferrite Transformer Eddy Currents -- the first hit on the list for me is a wikipedia article that explains it. :smile:
 

1. What are laminations and how can they minimize eddy current?

Laminations are thin layers of electrically insulating material, such as silicon steel, that are used to construct the core of electrical machines. These layers help to reduce the flow of eddy currents, which are induced currents that can cause energy loss and heating in the core.

2. How do laminations reduce eddy current?

Laminations work by breaking up the conductive path of eddy currents, which are caused by the changing magnetic field in the core. The thin layers of insulation disrupt the flow of current, reducing its strength and minimizing energy loss.

3. What is the significance of minimizing eddy current?

Eddy currents can lead to energy loss and heating in the core, which can decrease the efficiency and performance of electrical machines. By minimizing eddy currents, laminations help to improve the overall efficiency of the machine and reduce the risk of overheating.

4. How are laminations designed to minimize eddy current?

Laminations are designed with specific thicknesses and orientations to optimize their effectiveness in minimizing eddy currents. The layers are also coated with an insulating varnish to further reduce the flow of current.

5. Are there any other methods for minimizing eddy current?

Aside from using laminations, other methods for minimizing eddy current include using thicker conductors, reducing the frequency of the AC power source, and using magnetic shielding materials. However, laminations are the most common and effective method for minimizing eddy current in electrical machines.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
976
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
267
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
661
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
198
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top