We know a standard matsubara frequency sum that [itex]-\sum_{n}\frac{\xi}{2\pi ni-\xi}=n_B(\xi)[/itex], but this looks contradictory to the well-known formula [itex]\sum_{n}\frac{\xi}{n^2+\xi^2}=\pi \coth(\pi \xi)[/itex] if we take the imaginary part of the former sum.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know this matsubara frequency sum depends on the regulator since the sum itself diverges. But the imaginary part seems to be convergent well and the two results should conform. How to understand this contradiction?

Thank you!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# How to understand Matsubara frequency sum?

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

- Similar discussions for: How to understand Matsubara frequency sum?

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**