We know a standard matsubara frequency sum that [itex]-\sum_{n}\frac{\xi}{2\pi ni-\xi}=n_B(\xi)[/itex], but this looks contradictory to the well-known formula [itex]\sum_{n}\frac{\xi}{n^2+\xi^2}=\pi \coth(\pi \xi)[/itex] if we take the imaginary part of the former sum.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know this matsubara frequency sum depends on the regulator since the sum itself diverges. But the imaginary part seems to be convergent well and the two results should conform. How to understand this contradiction?

Thank you!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How to understand Matsubara frequency sum?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - understand Matsubara frequency | Date |
---|---|

I I need help understanding the meaning of Bloch waves | Feb 23, 2018 |

I Understanding autocorrelations in 2D Ising model | Feb 16, 2017 |

I How to understand diffusive and ballistic transport? | Nov 18, 2016 |

I Help Understanding Electron Spin Resonance | Oct 22, 2016 |

Matsubara frequency convergency factor | Sep 22, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**