How wise/unwise would it be to attempt to create a strangelet?

  • A
  • Thread starter greswd
  • Start date
In summary, the strange matter hypothesis suggests that strangelets could potentially cause a catastrophic reaction by converting ordinary matter to strange matter. While the odds of creating strangelets in particle accelerators are low, some argue that creating a device to increase the odds and study strange matter is necessary. However, others caution against this due to the potential dangers and suggest sending any experiments into space to avoid harm to Earth.
  • #1
greswd
764
20
Some hypothetical predictions of the strange matter hypothesis are that strangelets could possibly convert ordinary matter to strange matter in a critical reaction, "grey-goo"-like scenario.

Now, the odds of strangelets being created in particle accelerators are slim to none.

However, if we could create a device that would radically increase the odds, for the express purpose of creating strangelets, would it be unwise to do so, given the hypothesis of untold catastrophe?

Or should particle physicists strive to push the boundaries?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The inference that strangelet production could lead to a catastrophe seems strange. Where did you get that idea?
 
  • #3
  • #4
There is no natural process that can produce them with any relevant frequency, if at all. If we have reason to expect that any future process might increase the odds over all natural processes we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.
 
  • Wow
Likes berkeman
  • #5
mfb said:
we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.

so a precaution in case we could annihilate the earth?
 
  • #6
By the time we might have the chance to create such a thing we'll probably understand its properties better.
 
  • #7
It can't be too unwise, since physicists have been trying to do so for at least a half century in the form of searches for an H dibaryon resonance. Obviously, that has not created a catastrophe. If strange matter exists, it most likely would have to be bound by gravity in something like a strange star, which would not be very doable here on earth.
 
  • #8
mfb said:
There is no natural process that can produce them with any relevant frequency, if at all. If we have reason to expect that any future process might increase the odds over all natural processes we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.
The little green men out there might take a dim view of that.
 
  • #9
Space is big. Something that leaves the solar system is not expected to hit anything in the next few billion years, and might never hit anything until the heat death of the universe.
 
  • #10
mfb said:
Space is big. Something that leaves the solar system is not expected to hit anything in the next few billion years, and might never hit anything until the heat death of the universe.
Fair enough, but as far as I know, the LGM[1] would like us to keep our space pollution, especially any potentially hazardous anomaly, such as a strangelet, a micro black hole, or a magnetic monopole, as local as may be possible. :oldwink:

[1] LGM = Little Green Men
 

1. How does the creation of a strangelet relate to current scientific knowledge?

The creation of a strangelet is a theoretical concept that is not supported by current scientific knowledge. It is based on the idea that strange matter, a hypothetical form of matter made up of strange quarks, could have a lower energy state than normal matter. However, there is no evidence to support this theory and it goes against our current understanding of particle physics.

2. What are the potential risks associated with attempting to create a strangelet?

The potential risks of creating a strangelet are largely unknown, as it is a theoretical concept and has not been attempted in reality. However, some scientists have theorized that if a strangelet were to come into contact with normal matter, it could trigger a chain reaction that could convert all matter on Earth into strange matter. This could have catastrophic consequences for life on Earth.

3. Is there any benefit to creating a strangelet?

At this time, there is no known benefit to creating a strangelet. It is purely a theoretical concept and has not been proven to exist. Additionally, the risks associated with attempting to create one far outweigh any potential benefits.

4. What technology or equipment would be needed to attempt to create a strangelet?

The technology and equipment needed to attempt to create a strangelet would be extremely advanced and beyond our current capabilities. It would require a particle accelerator with energies far beyond what we are currently able to achieve. Additionally, the process would require precise control and monitoring to prevent any potential risks.

5. Are there any regulations or guidelines in place regarding the creation of a strangelet?

Currently, there are no regulations or guidelines in place specifically for the creation of a strangelet. However, any attempt to create one would likely fall under the jurisdiction of existing laws and regulations governing the use of particle accelerators and the handling of potentially hazardous materials. Additionally, the scientific community and governing bodies such as CERN have strict ethical standards in place for conducting research and would likely not support or condone such an experiment.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
978
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
135
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top