1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

HS students: what's a 'C' on your grade scale?

  1. Apr 21, 2005 #1

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    My sister's having kind of a rough time in high school this year. I was talking to her about it and I was really surprised to find out what her school's grade scale is:

    Numeric Average | Letter Grade | Description

    90-100 | A | Excellent Progress

    80-90 | B | Good Progress

    75-79 | C | Average Progress

    70-74 |D | Poor Progress

    69 and below |F | Failure

    When I was in high school, the scale we had was very similar to what I have in college now. A = (90-100), B= (80-89), C = (70-79), D = (60-69) F = 59 and below.

    I've never seen the 70-79 range get split the way it is done at my sister's school. Seems like it's more difficult these days to squeak by with a C! I only had to clear a 70, she has to at least get a 75.

    Anyway, I'm here to do a little survey. I would like to hear from high school students on this board if possible. (or people who have recently been in high school or people who have kids in high school, etc). I would like to know if your grading scale is similar to the one at my sister's school.

    Thanks in advance for your help. :smile:

    p.s. I am not sure if 90 counts as a B or an A at my sister's school. I pulled these grade scales straight out of the school district's documentation. I am still reading through it trying to find clarification.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2005 #2
    is that numeric value on a 0-100 scale? Around here (scandinavia) 50% correct is usually a passing grade. I really think there needs to be a universal grading system :) I have no clue how A,B,C's work or the 4.0 scale that american uni's seem to use.
     
  4. Apr 21, 2005 #3
    A = (90-100), B= (80-89), C = (70-79), D = (60-69) F = 59 and below.

    I've never seen it otherwise, does she go to a private school?
     
  5. Apr 21, 2005 #4

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate it - please keep it coming- it's great to get opinions from students outside as well as inside the U.S.

    whozum, she actually goes to a public school in Texas. go figure.
     
  6. Apr 21, 2005 #5
    That's how it is where I live (Croatia), as well. I really dislike High School, but thankfully it will be over soon and then I can move on to University. :smile:
     
  7. Apr 21, 2005 #6

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yes, it's just a percentage. 90 = 90% correct

    Dracovich, I agree with you - there should be a universal system, but I don't know if there is any hope of ever having an international standard for grading if the U.S. scales aren't even consistent among public schools in the same state!
     
  8. Apr 21, 2005 #7
    At my highschool we went A-100-93 B-85-92 C-78-84 D-70-77 F-69 and below.
     
  9. Apr 21, 2005 #8

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Are you in the U.S.? Was your school public or private? Thanks.
     
  10. Apr 21, 2005 #9
    U.S. Private catholic school
     
  11. Apr 21, 2005 #10
    In my current private school in Connecticut :

    A - 90-100
    B- 80-89
    C- 70-79
    D - 60-69

    In my previous Indian International School located in Dubai, United Arab Emirates ( Middle east ) We used percentages instaed of letter grades.. We had to secure 40% or more to pass the course/exam. 70% is considered average and 80% or above is considered good..
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2005
  12. Apr 21, 2005 #11
    A - 90-100
    B- 80-89
    C- 70-79
    D - 60-69

    I was in public high school and we had that system the entire time. And our teachers usually graded on curves, where the maximum possible points was reset to the number of points of the highest grade.
     
  13. Apr 21, 2005 #12
    At my high school (in Canada) we only used numerical system, and a fail was <50% (which is the same at my current university).
     
  14. Apr 21, 2005 #13
    From my private school-
    90-100 A
    80-89 B
    70-79 C
    Etc. Note we are the only school I am aware of that did not give actual GPAs to students, nor were we ranked. The reasoning behind this was they did not want 41 very intelligent girls getting all cutthroat as we did that enough just for who got cum laude (made for an interesting thing when I applied for scholarships however).
    The public high school in my area I should've gone to had I not taken the private school route is as follows (my roommate is shouting over my shoulder that this is how all West Virginian schools are as well, if you're interested)-
    94-100 A
    85-93 B
    78-84 C
    Etc. Note that the public school I would've gone to had MASSIVE grade inflation going on so it wasn't that bad (enrolled in AP class= automatic A and such... yea there was a reason I didn't go there!).
     
  15. Apr 21, 2005 #14
    Why do they do this?

    Does someone high up in the school district decide that too many people are getting A's or C's. Do high schools get a rep if not enough people fail? Help the local economy by making sure not enough people go to college?
    :wink:

    My old high school
    AP class
    5.0 100 -90%
    4.0 89 - 80
    ... 10% increments
    non AP
    4.0 100-90%
    3.0 89-80
    ...10% increments

    After the year I graduated they had two cum laude one for when counting AP classes as regular 4.0-0 and anther counting AP classes as 5.0-0. It has been ~4 years since then. I think it has been two different people each time.
     
  16. Apr 22, 2005 #15

    ek

    User Avatar

    British Columbia Public High School Grade Scheme:

    A 86-100
    B 73-85
    C+ 67-72
    C 60-66
    C- 50-59
    F 0-49
     
  17. Apr 22, 2005 #16

    And i thought our education system let people through much too easily.
     
  18. Apr 22, 2005 #17

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Thank you everyone. I can't tell you how grateful I am for your feedback.
    My sister's had a pretty hard time. On her last report card she fell just barely below 75% in Spanish 2 and Geometry and that was enough to get her kicked off her high school drill team. Not only that, but she's forbidden from even trying out for next year, even if she brings her grades up before the end of the term. She's very upset over the situation.
    She's a good kid and she works hard. She does great in her other classes - especially science and health - and I think the school is being a little bit harsh with her.
     
  19. Apr 22, 2005 #18

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Wow...I agree. I'm not sure what a "drill team" is, but I'd be willing to bet it has nothing to do with either Spanish or Geometry. (Edit, have just learned it refers to somewhat military-like, parade marching with cool maneuvers, rifle twirling etc.) So I'm guessing that it was your sister's cumulative average that the drill team was using as a criterion, and those two courses managed to lower it past the "cutoff" (?). This fixation on marks for something like a team is ludicrous. Doesn't the fact that she made the team in the first place speak to her worthiness of being on it? What about the skills she's developed as part of the team? Aren't they needed? The analogy to a sports team would be like the coach saying, "well, you're a skilled player and have become an integral part of this team, but you suddenly don't meet our artificial academic standards, so we're going to boot you off." :grumpy:

    As illogical as it is, it's quite a common practice I think, that a student's academic performance governs her opportunities in other areas. What really boggled my mind was their unwillingness to reconsider her for this team next year should she once again meet their ridiculous requirements. Huh? So, despite the fact that she is clearly capable of maintaining that standard based on her past performance, the moment she fails to do so, they assume that she never ever will again, and even if she does, it is no longer valid? :uhh:

    Well MIH, you managed to get me all worked up about it. :rofl: Now if only you can provoke the same response in someone at the school.
     
  20. Apr 22, 2005 #19
    Am i missing something? Are the tests on that scale easier or something? It seems weird that standardized tests such as those that one that measures mathmatical understanding between nations etc, seems to not rank scandinavia below USA, but still if a passing grade is 70% right then that would imply that they are getting a bigger % right on their tests then people in scandinavia. 70% right here is a respectable grade 80% is good and anything above is great.

    Can it really be the same tests with different scales of passing? That would either mean that the american education system is vastly superior and produces better results, or that a ****load of people are failing (i'd guess that if the cutoff was at 70% then about 30% of students were failing). Then again maybe people would just automaticly conform to a different scale and try harder.
     
  21. Apr 22, 2005 #20
    Why is it that the US is consistently not ranked near the top in science and math scores on tests when compared to other nations, but we produce a lot of the top scientists in almost every field?
     
  22. Apr 22, 2005 #21
    Mine is exactly the same as Andromeda321's scale.
    94-100 A
    85-93 B
    78-84 C...
    Public School in Iowa.

    Paden Roder
     
  23. Apr 22, 2005 #22

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'm glad I didn't go to high school with you. I'd probably still be trying to graduate!!!

    cepheid, thanks for your thoughts. I got some good news this morning. The school district has decided to let her try out for next year after all. :smile:
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2005
  24. Apr 22, 2005 #23

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The drill team accompanies the marching band (they're the ones that twirl flags and do the dancing and stuff while the band plays in formations). Things like that fall under the same category as athletics in terms of grade requirements. It's not that you need good grades to be a good rifle twirler, it's that if you can't keep your grades up, then it's considered an activity that's taking time away from your studying, which you clearly need to do more of if you aren't passing (may or may not be true). So, having to maintain a certain grade average to stay on the team is really intended to protect the students. It also gives the "dumb jocks" incentive to spend a little time studying, so when they discover they aren't going to walk out of high school with an NFL contract, they have a chance at doing something else.

    I'm wondering if those schools that have grade scales other than every 10 percentage points is a different letter are really tougher, or do they just inflate the scores to still give the students pretty much the same letter grade they'd get anywhere else? I think this is why colleges have to rely so much on standardized testing for admissions decisions, because it's the only way to find out if an A means the same across all the different high schools, especially when they know it doesn't.

    Incidentally, colleges and universities also have differences in grading scales. Back when I gave med school applications a shot, they have one standard application service, so you apply once and fill in the list of schools you want your application sent to (a few med schools use their own applications or want supplemental materials sent, but most just rely on the standard application). I remember the biggest pain of filling it out was the section to calculate your GPA, because they didn't just want what you college gave you as a GPA, they wanted it on a standardized scale. So, they had pages of all the different grading systems universities used, did they have pluses and minuses, what was the % cut off for each grade, etc. Then you recalculated your GPA based on their scale. Or maybe they just did that to weed out anyone who can't do basic math. :rolleyes:

    MIH, a lot of high school students really struggle with geometry. It's just done so differently from any other math classes that they really run into problems with it. It's the only time in secondary school students are expected to know how to do proofs. I don't know if there's much you can do to really help someone learn that if they aren't understanding it either. That class sticks out in my mind because all our teacher ever said when someone would ask for further explanation of how to attack a proof was, "It's all just logic, you just have to be logical." :grumpy: I actually really excelled in that class, but when my friends would ask for help or want to know how I studied or prepared, etc., there was nothing I could tell them, it was like it either clicked and came to you intuitively or it didn't. I guess being able to memorize all those long lists of theorems and corollaries and not get them confused was a big part of it, and then the rest was managing to recall the right theorem at the right time.

    You know, as I think on it, learning a language might use a similar thought/learning process. Again, you learn huge lists of vocabulary words, a lot of grammatical rules, and then you have to recall the right words and right rules at the right time to construct sentences. We spend too much time memorizing lists of things and then regurgitating them as a list form, or with prompts (define this term...) in schools that a previously good student may suddenly begin to have trouble when they can no longer rely on those prompts to search their brain for stored information.

    I wonder if there's a generalizable method to help her develop that skill better so she can pull her grades up. For example, as she's going through flash cards to learn vocabulary words in Spanish, instead of just giving the definition of the word she's looking at, have someone ask her to now recall a synonym of that word, or an antonym, or if it's a noun, name a verb that could follow it in a sentence. In geometry, when she's going through her list of theorems, when she describes one, then have her try to recall one or two other ones that are similar, you know, like Side Angle Side and Side Angle Angle (my memory is hazy, I think that's one...I just will never forget my geometry teacher telling us over and over that there is no such theorem as Angle Side Side, to the giggling amusement of the class; it was the only thing resembling a joke she ever told us) for determining the lengths and angles of a triangle. She may just need help finding a better way to study this material that's different from what she's done before.
     
  25. Apr 22, 2005 #24

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Getting her to accept any help at all has been a real challenge. Her grades have slipped before but she absolutely refused to go to a tutor. She just said "It's ok, I can handle it." I think it's an ego thing with her. She wants to do everything herself. She's stubborn as a mule. Must be genetic. I also went through an eye-rolling, door-slamming phase at 16. :redface:
    Mom is forcing her to go to a tutor now, but she's been fairly agreeable to it since she got really got her butt in a sling this time.
     
  26. Apr 22, 2005 #25

    JamesU

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    If it still matters, here's my school's grading system:

    100-89.5 =A
    89 -79.5 =B
    79-69.5 =C
    69-59.5 =D
    59&below=F

    The ".5's" are just because they have to round your grade.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook