- #1
zomgwtf
- 66
- 2
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44002915/ns/us/_news-crime_and_courts/#.TjmjfGFKO_IInvestigators said an estimated 600 people used a private, members-only Internet bulletin board called Dreamboard to access the graphic images. Federal prosecutors have filed charges against 72 people in what they described as the largest prosecution ever of an online child pornography operation.
...
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents said dozens of children, in the U.S. and overseas, have been brought to safety after they were identified in the more than 27,000 images uploaded to the Internet bulletin board, NBC News reported. In addition to the U.S., arrests were made in Canada, Denmark, Ecuador, France, Germany, Hungary, Kenya, The Netherlands, the Philippines, Qatar, Serbia, Sweden and Switzerland.
There was over 100 terabytes of child pornography swapped here.
From the indictment I've read the rules required to be in the site.
b. Keep the girls under 13, in fact, I really need to see 12 or younger to know your [sic] a brother
...
c. And don't avoid nudity in previews. I will not accept you if there's [sic] no nudity...
Here's the indictment document:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61615609/Rush-F-Blankenship-Indictment
The language is strong in some parts (such as the rules).
This is absolutely disgusting. There are some reports from British media that there were even 'child porn snuff videos' where they filmed children being killed.
What I'm curious about is how such a ring could have gone on long enough to amass over 100 terabytes of child pornography. How could the hosts of this forum not do anything about what was being done? With file names such as:
toddler - man trying to penatrade toddler girl 3yo gets it every way imaginable.mpg
The titles given on the website were far worse... far worse. I hope every person involved in this forum are extradited to the states