Human Evolution

  • Thread starter Tenunbow
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Is physical weakness the catalyst that started Human evolution?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
russ_watters
Mentor
19,704
6,041
I don't even understand the question. Physical weakness of who/what? Start of evolution? There is no such thing for an individual species.
 
  • #4
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
That possibility has been debated, sometimes rather hotly. Obviously human migration from forest to the savanna brought new challenges. I don't think there is much disagreement that would provide increased selection pressure. It appears the points in dispute principly relate to the logic and timing behind specific adaptations. For discussion see: http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2014/...ans-evolve-on-the-savanna-the-debate-heats-up.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Pythagorean
Gold Member
4,193
258
I wouldn't apply such a blanket statement to the whole of human evolution. But there are some cases in human evolution that you might interpret that way. For instance, smaller jaw muscles (a mutation you might consider a weakness) may have led to bigger brains.
 
  • #6
jim mcnamara
Mentor
3,946
2,344
teleology: the explanation of phenomena by the purpose they appear to serve rather than by postulated causes.

This is what is happening with the original concept posted.

Evolution is an emergent process - it has no predefined purpose or intent; it has no direction; it has no ultimate goal. It is not smart nor is it stupid. The process is purely driven by environmental factors and changes that enforce different survival rates. Survival == successful reproduction. Those governing differences are the genetic differences in a group of organisms in the environment you are considering.

D Hosfstadter proposed a reason for why we do this kind of teleological thinking. Humans have hard-wired templates for analyzing new concepts.
If you see a log laying over a stream you walk on the log, rather than wade through the stream. Humans that have never seen a man-made bridge implicitly understand what it meant is for. Sometimes these templates lead us astray. In this case, applying human pre-defined "causes" to the current point of human evolution when there is none.
 

Related Threads on Human Evolution

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
67
Views
14K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
76
Views
25K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
8K
Top