Solving the Quantum Mechanics of a Hydrogen Atom

In summary,The state of the electron is in general described by a statistical operator, i.e., a self-adjoint positive semidefinite operator with trace 1, ##\hat{\rho}##.Then observables are described by self-adjoint operators too. The possible outcome of measuring an observable ##O##, represented by a self-adjoint operator ##\hat{O}## are the (generalized) eigenvalues of this operator. Then for each (generalized) eigenvalue ##o## of ##\hat{O}## there exists a orthonormal set of eigenvectors ##|o,\alpha \rangle## with ##\l
  • #1
frustrationboltzmann
5
2
Hello, I have a little problem understanding the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom.
Im troubled with the following question: before i measure the state of a (simplified: without fine-, hyperfinestructure) hydrogen atom, which is the right probability density of finding the electron? is it the density of the groud state (s) or the 2s, 3s...?

my assumption is the following:
the probability of a state to be occupied is given by the fermi dirac distribution for a certain temperature. so in order to get the probability density of the location of the electron before it is measured, I multiply each (normalized) probability density with the occupation probability of every eigenstate and sum over all those products. is this right or complete nonsense?

also if its right, how would I treat degenerated quantum states. my assumption. multiply every degenerated states by the probability of the fermi dirac distribution and divide by the number of degenerated states, since I assume that they all have the same probability.

this would be a mixed state, no?

I appreciate any help!
thank you very much
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all you have to get the concepts right. In quantum theory you have to clearly distinguish between "states" and "observables". You cannot "measure states" in the usual sense but only observables.

The state of the electron is in general described by a statistical operator, i.e., a self-adjoint positive semidefinite operator with trace 1, ##\hat{\rho}##.

Then observables are described by self-adjoint operators too. The possible outcome of measuring an observable ##O##, represented by a self-adjoint operator ##\hat{O}## are the (generalized) eigenvalues of this operator. Then for each (generalized) eigenvalue ##o## of ##\hat{O}## there exists a orthonormal set of eigenvectors ##|o,\alpha \rangle## with ##\langle o,\alpha|o',\alpha' \rangle=\delta_{oo'} \delta_{\alpha \alpha'}##. If there are eigenvalues in the continuum (which can also be the case for the parameter(s) ##\alpha##) then the Kronecker ##\delta##'s become Dirac ##\delta## distributions.

If the system is prepared in the state described by the statistical operator ##\hat{\rho}##, then the probability (distribution) for finding the value ##o## when measuring ##O## is given by
$$\sum_{\alpha} \langle o,\alpha|\hat{\rho}|\langle o,\alpha \rangle.$$
For the hydrogen atom (at rest) you can use energy eigenvectors as a complete set. To fully determine the eigenvectors you can diagonalize the compatible operators ##\hat{\vec{L}}^2## and ##\hat{L}_z## as well as the spin ##\hat{s}_z## of the electron (the usual non-relativistic approximation).

Then you get energy eigenvectors for the discrete part of the spectrum (bound states)
$$|E_n,l,m,s_z \rangle, \quad E_{n} =-\frac{13.6 \; \text{eV}}{n^2}, \quad n \in \{1,2,3,\ldots \}, \quad l \in \{0,1,2,\ldots\}, \quad m \in \{-l,-l+1,...,l-1,l \}, \quad s_z \in \{-1/2,1/2 \}.$$
and generalized eigenvectors for the continuous part (scattering states)
$$|E,l,m,s_z \rangle \quad \text{with} \quad E>0, \quad l,m,s_z \quad \text{as for the bound states}.$$
The thermal-equilibrium state is given by the stat. op.
$$\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}), \quad \beta=1/(k T), \quad Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}).$$
The energy eigenstates are also eigenstates of the thermal-equilibrium state of course, and you can use the basis to evaluate all probabilities with the above given rules.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy
  • #3
vanhees71 said:
First of all you have to get the concepts right. In quantum theory you have to clearly distinguish between "states" and "observables". You cannot "measure states" in the usual sense but only observables.

The state of the electron is in general described by a statistical operator, i.e., a self-adjoint positive semidefinite operator with trace 1, ##\hat{\rho}##.

Then observables are described by self-adjoint operators too. The possible outcome of measuring an observable ##O##, represented by a self-adjoint operator ##\hat{O}## are the (generalized) eigenvalues of this operator. Then for each (generalized) eigenvalue ##o## of ##\hat{O}## there exists a orthonormal set of eigenvectors ##|o,\alpha \rangle## with ##\langle o,\alpha|o',\alpha' \rangle=\delta_{oo'} \delta_{\alpha \alpha'}##. If there are eigenvalues in the continuum (which can also be the case for the parameter(s) ##\alpha##) then the Kronecker ##\delta##'s become Dirac ##\delta## distributions.

If the system is prepared in the state described by the statistical operator ##\hat{\rho}##, then the probability (distribution) for finding the value ##o## when measuring ##O## is given by
$$\sum_{\alpha} \langle o,\alpha|\hat{\rho}|\langle o,\alpha \rangle.$$
For the hydrogen atom (at rest) you can use energy eigenvectors as a complete set. To fully determine the eigenvectors you can diagonalize the compatible operators ##\hat{\vec{L}}^2## and ##\hat{L}_z## as well as the spin ##\hat{s}_z## of the electron (the usual non-relativistic approximation).

Then you get energy eigenvectors for the discrete part of the spectrum (bound states)
$$|E_n,l,m,s_z \rangle, \quad E_{n} =-\frac{13.6 \; \text{eV}}{n^2}, \quad n \in \{1,2,3,\ldots \}, \quad l \in \{0,1,2,\ldots\}, \quad m \in \{-l,-l+1,...,l-1,l \}, \quad s_z \in \{-1/2,1/2 \}.$$
and generalized eigenvectors for the continuous part (scattering states)
$$|E,l,m,s_z \rangle \quad \text{with} \quad E>0, \quad l,m,s_z \quad \text{as for the bound states}.$$
The thermal-equilibrium state is given by the stat. op.
$$\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}), \quad \beta=1/(k T), \quad Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}).$$
The energy eigenstates are also eigenstates of the thermal-equilib state of course, and you can basis to evaluate all probabilities with the above given rules.

Thank you for this detailled answer. 1 question remains unclear. Why do I use the Boltzmann factor here and not the fermi dirac probability since electrons are fermions and its not a classical system?
 
  • #4
Here you deal only with 1 electron, and for one particle you don't recognize whether it's a boson or a fermion.

In many-body physics the statistical operator for the grand-canonical potential is still
$$\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp[-\beta (\hat{H}-\mu \hat{Q} ],$$
but this time ##\hat{H}## is the quantum-field theoretical Hamiltonian, and ##\hat{Q}## is some conserved charge (or in non-relativistic physics often the particle number).

Here the Bose or Fermi nature of the particle comes in naturally due to field quantization in terms of commutators or anticommutators, respectively.
 
  • Like
Likes frustrationboltzmann

1. What is the Schrödinger equation and how does it relate to solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom?

The Schrödinger equation is a mathematical equation that describes the behavior of a quantum system, such as the hydrogen atom. It takes into account the wave-like nature of particles and allows us to calculate the probability of finding a particle in a certain location. By solving the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom, we can determine the energy levels and wave functions of the electron in the atom.

2. What are the main assumptions made in solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom?

The main assumptions made in solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom are that the electron is a point particle with no internal structure, the proton is stationary, and the electron-proton system is in a state of equilibrium. These assumptions simplify the calculations and allow us to accurately predict the behavior of the system.

3. How does the Bohr model of the atom differ from the quantum mechanics approach to solving the hydrogen atom?

The Bohr model of the atom is a simplified model that describes the electron in the hydrogen atom as orbiting the nucleus in circular orbits at specific energy levels. It does not take into account the wave-like nature of particles and does not accurately predict the behavior of other elements. In contrast, the quantum mechanics approach uses the Schrödinger equation to describe the behavior of the electron in terms of wave functions and energy levels, providing a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the atom.

4. What is the significance of the energy levels in solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom?

The energy levels in the hydrogen atom represent the different possible states of the electron in the atom. These energy levels are quantized, meaning they can only take on certain discrete values, and are determined by the solutions to the Schrödinger equation. The energy levels play a crucial role in understanding the behavior of the electron, such as its absorption and emission of energy, and are essential in many practical applications of quantum mechanics.

5. How does solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom contribute to our understanding of the physical world?

Solving the quantum mechanics of a hydrogen atom has been a fundamental achievement in the field of physics and has greatly contributed to our understanding of the physical world. It has allowed us to accurately predict and explain the behavior of atoms and molecules, leading to advancements in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and electronics. It has also challenged our traditional understanding of classical physics and has paved the way for further developments in quantum mechanics and other areas of physics.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
899
Replies
2
Views
989
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
983
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top