Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I can't Find My Latex Error

  1. Sep 1, 2009 #1
    Code (Text):
    \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal L(a_1,…a_n, …;\dot a_1,..,\dot a_n, …;t)}{\partial a_i}\right) - \left(\frac{d}{dy} \frac{\partial \mathcal L(a_1,…a_n, …;\dot a_1,..,\dot a_n, …;t)}{\partial \dot a_i}\right) = 0 \quad \text{for } i = 1, \dots, n, i \neq j
    The above equation works on this form but won't work on my wordpress blog (see Lagrangian Mechanics and The Heat Equation), and it won't work on http://www.climateaudit.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=766&p=14997#p14997 [Broken]. Is there any useful tools for debugging latex equations? If anyone is curious the above equation is the Eular Lagrange Equation.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 1, 2009 #2
    \mathcal is usually succeeded by {blah}. Could that be the problem?

    You can use TeXnic for debugging information.
     
  4. Sep 1, 2009 #3
    I gave it a try. No such luck though. Thanks though. I'm going to give TeXnic a try. Hopefully it will save me a lot of trouble in the future.
     
  5. Sep 1, 2009 #4

    cristo

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Try changing \text to \textrm (or something).
     
  6. Sep 1, 2009 #5

    statdad

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    "\mathcal is usually succeeded by {blah}. Could that be the problem?"

    No - if the argument to mathcal is longer than a single character then {} would be needed, but without them it is applied only to the next character, the L.

    I copied your code and tried it in Latexit on my Macbook pro - no problem - it compiled it without a hitch, and displayed it just as you see it above. If this is indeed what it should look like, perhaps there is a code structure used here that your other software doesn't support? Or perhaps it's something so glaringly simple that we all miss it at first shot.

    [tex]
    \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal L(a_1,…a_n, …;\dot a_1,..,\dot a_n, …;t)}{\partial a_i}\right) - \left(\frac{d}{dy} \frac{\partial \mathcal L(a_1,…a_n, …;\dot a_1,..,\dot a_n, …;t)}{\partial \dot a_i}\right) = 0 \quad \text{for } i = 1, \dots, n, i \neq j
    [/tex]

    and no, \text is designed specifically to be used inside displays like this, so we no longer have to work with those annoying little boxes to get the formatting correct. textrm would probably work too, but I don't think this is where the problem might be.
     
  7. Sep 1, 2009 #6

    cristo

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Well, I just ran the input in a boring tex file (i.e. something that looked like \documentclass{article}\begin{document}$$math$$\end{document}), and I got an "undefined control sequence" error for \text, which this went away with \textrm.


    By the way, to the OP, you should replace "..." with "\ldots".
     
  8. Sep 1, 2009 #7

    statdad

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Bingo - \text works when the amsmath package is used - if you don't have it in your preamble you get the undefined control sequence error.

    I don't know how the interpreters for this site and the OPs blogs are set up, but it would seem that the default settings here load amsmath while the other sites do not.
     
  9. Sep 2, 2009 #8
    Thankyou. This was the problem :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook